Suppr超能文献

实时超声引导新生儿脐静脉置管的系统评价与Meta分析

Real-time ultrasound for umbilical venous catheter insertion in neonates- a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Anne Rajendra Prasad, Rahiman Emine A, Aradhya Abhishek Somashekara

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Department of Pediatric Oncology, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Ultrasound J. 2025 Jan 13;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13089-025-00406-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There has been an increase in real-time ultrasonography use in central venous catheterisation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the role of real-time ultrasound use in umbilical venous catheterisation in neonates.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched on July 11, 2024. We followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (for study conduct), GRADE methodology (for certainty of evidence), and PRISMA guidelines (for reporting).

STUDY SELECTION

All randomised controlled trials/RCTs and non-randomised studies of interventions/NRSIs comparing real-time ultrasound with the conventional technique of umbilical venous catheterisation were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

The outcomes of interest were malposition rates, procedure duration, mortality, sepsis, and cost. Data extraction and quality assessment were done in duplicate.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Six studies (three RCTs and three NRSI), including 863 participants, were included. Data were analysed separately for RCTs and NRSIs. The RCTs were at low risk of bias, but NRSIs were at moderate to serious risk. The pooled estimates from RCTs showed a decrease in malposition rates (2 studies, 165 participants, risk ratio/RR 0.45, 95% confidence interval/CI 0.23, 0.90) and procedure duration (3 studies, 196 participants, mean difference -6.1 min, 95% CI -8.4, -3.8 min) with real-time ultrasound use. There was no reduction in sepsis. Mortality was not reported. The certainty of evidence was low for malposition rates and procedure duration. The data from NRSIs showed a reduction in malposition rates (3 studies, 667 participants, risk ratio/RR 0.10, 95% confidence interval/CI 0.07, 0.14) without an impact on procedure duration and sepsis. However, these findings did not improve the evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Low certainty evidence suggests that using real-time ultrasound for umbilical venous catheterisation reduces malposition rates. There is a clinically insignificant reduction in procedure duration. There is no sufficient data to come to a conclusion on the critical outcomes of sepsis and mortality. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024567895.

摘要

目的

在中心静脉置管中,实时超声的使用有所增加。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估实时超声在新生儿脐静脉置管中的作用。

数据来源

于2024年7月11日检索了PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆。我们遵循了Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册(用于研究实施)、GRADE方法(用于证据的确定性)和PRISMA指南(用于报告)。

研究选择

纳入所有比较实时超声与传统脐静脉置管技术的随机对照试验(RCT)和干预性非随机研究(NRSI)。

数据提取

感兴趣的结局包括位置不当率、操作持续时间、死亡率、败血症和成本。数据提取和质量评估由两人独立进行。

数据合成

纳入六项研究(三项RCT和三项NRSI),共863名参与者。对RCT和NRSI的数据分别进行分析。RCT的偏倚风险较低,但NRSI的偏倚风险为中度至重度。RCT的汇总估计显示,使用实时超声可降低位置不当率(两项研究,165名参与者,风险比RR 0.45,95%置信区间CI 0.23,0.90)和操作持续时间(三项研究,196名参与者;平均差值-6.1分钟;95%置信区间-8.4至-3.8分钟)。败血症发生率没有降低。未报告死亡率。位置不当率和操作持续时间方面的证据确定性较低。NRSI的数据显示位置不当率降低(三项研究,667名参与者,风险比RR 0.10, 95%置信区间CI 0.07, 0.14),但对操作持续时间和败血症无影响。然而,这些结果并未改善证据。

结论

低确定性证据表明,在脐静脉置管中使用实时超声可降低位置不当率,并使操作持续时间有临床上不显著的缩短。对于败血症和死亡率这些关键结局尚无足够数据得出结论。PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024567895。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e35/11730037/e7f0418d26ef/13089_2025_406_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验