• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜取石术操作的全球差异:基于培训、经验和地区的评估

World-wide variation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy practices: evaluation based on training, experience, and region.

作者信息

Gupta Kavita, Savin Ziv, Lundon Dara, Connors Christopher, Serna Juan, Ricapito Anna, Khargi Raymond, Shimonov Roman, Yaghoubian Alan J, Gallante Blair, Atallah William M, Gupta Mantu

机构信息

Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 424 W. 59th Street, Suite 4F, New York, NY, 10019, USA.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2025 Sep 1;43(1):523. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05901-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-025-05901-0
PMID:40888955
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has undergone numerous technological innovations recently that make it even less invasive, but global adoption of these innovations remains unclear. This study sought to compare the effect of region and education on the penetrance of recent advances in PCNL worldwide.

METHODS

An anonymous 32-item survey was developed and distributed via the Endourological Society's Twitter/X account in November 2023. The survey collected data on participants' geographic region, PCNL volume, fellowship training, and PCNL practices. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used for comparisons.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 160 PCNL providers worldwide. Respondents were categorized by geography, fellowship training, and procedural volume. Spinal anesthesia was more commonly used by Asian providers (31%, p = 0.001), while supine positioning was notably more common in Europe (76%, p = 0.001). Asian providers favored pneumatic energy (63%), while North American and European providers more frequently used dual energy lithotripters (31-72%) and hemostatic tract agents (p < 0.001). High-volume providers and those with more post-fellowship experience tended to use smaller sheaths, including mini-PCNL. Postoperative imaging practices also varied by region and fellowship-training status.

CONCLUSION

PCNL practices vary significantly worldwide, influenced by regional, economic, and experiential factors. Our survey indicates a significant shift in practices with 41% of providers using supine position and over 50% doing tubeless PCNL. However, ultrasound access has been slow to gain widespread use with 73% still using predominantly fluoroscopy, similar to prior studies. Further randomized studies are needed to establish the clinical effectiveness of new technologies and to drive standardization of care across geographic and economic barriers.

摘要

引言

经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)近年来经历了众多技术创新,使其侵入性更小,但这些创新在全球的应用情况仍不明确。本研究旨在比较地区和教育水平对PCNL近期进展在全球范围内普及程度的影响。

方法

2023年11月,通过腔内泌尿外科协会的推特/X账号开展了一项包含32个项目的匿名调查。该调查收集了参与者的地理区域、PCNL手术量、专科培训情况以及PCNL操作实践等数据。计算描述性统计数据,并使用卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验进行比较。

结果

全球160名PCNL提供者回复了调查。受访者按地理区域、专科培训情况和手术量进行分类。亚洲提供者更常使用脊髓麻醉(31%,p = 0.001),而仰卧位在欧洲更为常见(76%,p = 0.001)。亚洲提供者更倾向于使用气动能量(63%),而北美和欧洲提供者更频繁地使用双能量碎石机(31 - 72%)和止血通道剂(p < 0.001)。手术量大的提供者以及专科培训后经验更丰富的提供者倾向于使用更小的鞘管,包括迷你PCNL。术后成像实践也因地区和专科培训状况而异。

结论

全球范围内PCNL操作存在显著差异,受地区性、经济性和经验性因素影响。我们的调查表明操作有显著转变,41%的提供者使用仰卧位,超过50%的人进行无管PCNL。然而,超声引导的应用推广缓慢,73%的人仍主要使用荧光镜检查,这与先前的研究类似。需要进一步的随机研究来确定新技术的临床有效性,并推动跨越地理和经济障碍的护理标准化。

相似文献

1
World-wide variation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy practices: evaluation based on training, experience, and region.经皮肾镜取石术操作的全球差异:基于培训、经验和地区的评估
World J Urol. 2025 Sep 1;43(1):523. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05901-0.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
4
A Global Survey to Assess Urologists' Attitudes Towards Suction Technology in Endourology by the European Association of Urology Section of Endourology and Progressive Endourological Association for Research and Leading Solutions.欧洲泌尿外科学会腔内泌尿外科分会和渐进性腔内泌尿外科研究与领先解决方案协会开展的一项全球调查,以评估泌尿外科医生对腔内泌尿外科吸引技术的态度。
Urology. 2025 Mar;197:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.12.009. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
5
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery versus percutaneuos nephrolithotomy for complex pediatric stone disease: A comparative analysis of efficacy and safety.内镜下联合肾内手术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗复杂小儿肾结石病:疗效和安全性的对比分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Aug;20(4):606.e1-606.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.05.025. Epub 2024 May 31.
6
Tranexamic acid for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.氨甲环酸在经皮肾镜碎石术中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 26;10(10):CD015122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015122.pub2.
7
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗成人肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 13;11(11):CD013445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013445.pub2.
8
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 24(11):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub3.
9
Which is easier for beginners: supine or prone position percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Assessment of the learning curve in novice urologists through a randomized clinical trial.对于初学者来说,哪种经皮肾镜取石术更容易:仰卧位还是俯卧位?通过一项随机临床试验评估新手泌尿外科医生的学习曲线。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2024 Dec;76(6):748-758. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05974-3.
10
Validation of stone-kidney size score to predict outcome and complications of pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy.验证结石-肾脏大小评分以预测小儿经皮肾镜取石术的结局和并发症。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Dec;20(6):1026-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.07.030. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative analysis of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective study on surgical team and operating room personnel satisfaction.经皮肾镜取石术中腰硬联合麻醉与全身麻醉的对比分析:一项关于手术团队和手术室人员满意度的前瞻性研究。
World J Urol. 2024 Apr 26;42(1):262. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04977-4.
2
Mini-versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric population: A randomized controlled trial.微创经皮肾镜碎石术与标准经皮肾镜碎石术治疗小儿肾结石:一项随机对照试验。
J Pediatr Urol. 2023 Dec;19(6):688-695. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.08.013. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
3
Outcome of Mini-PCNL Under Loco-Regional Anesthesia: Outcomes of a Systematic Review.
局麻下微创经皮肾镜取石术的结局:系统评价的结果。
Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Sep;24(9):417-426. doi: 10.1007/s11934-023-01169-2. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
4
The Role of Experience: How Case Volume and Endourology-Fellowship Training Impact Surgical Outcomes for Ureteroscopy.经验的作用:病例数量和腔内泌尿外科 fellowship 培训如何影响输尿管镜检查的手术结果。
J Endourol. 2023 Jul;37(7):843-851. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0142. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
5
The influencing factors of infectious complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮肾镜碎石取石术后感染性并发症的影响因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Dec 14;51(1):17. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01376-5.
6
Ureterorenoscopy during normothermic machine perfusion: effect of varying renal pelvis pressure.常温机器灌注下的输尿管肾镜检查:肾盂压力变化的影响
BJU Int. 2023 Jan;131(1):50-52. doi: 10.1111/bju.15911. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
7
Comparison between standard, mini and ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for single renal stones: a prospective study.标准、迷你和超迷你经皮肾镜取石术治疗单个肾结石的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
World J Urol. 2022 Oct;40(10):2543-2548. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04107-y. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
8
Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: update and perspective in developing countries. A narrative review.一次性使用软性输尿管镜:发展中国家的更新与展望。叙述性综述。
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 May-Jun;48(3):456-467. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0475.
9
Comparison of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较微创经皮肾镜取石术和标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗>2cm 肾结石:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Jul-Aug;48(4):637-648. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0347.
10
Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of Renal Stone Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.微创经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Sep;8(5):1376-1385. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.07.014. Epub 2021 Aug 14.