Department of Operative Dentistry and Dental Materials, Dental School, Federal University of Uberlândia(UFU), Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Dental School, CEUMA University, São Luis, Maranhão, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2021 Jul-Aug;32(4):19-30. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202104002.
This study investigated the bleaching effectiveness and the physicochemical effects on enamel of violet light and ozone, associate or not to hydrogen peroxide, compared to 35%-hydrogen peroxide. Enamel-dentin blocks from human molars were randomly allocated to receive one of the following bleaching protocols (n=15): (HP) 35%-hydrogen peroxide, (VL) violet light, (OZ) ozone, the association between hydrogen peroxide with ozone (OZ+HP) or violet light (VL+HP). All protocols were performed in two sessions with a 48h interval. Color (spectrophotometer) and mineral composition (Raman spectroscopy) were measured before and after the bleaching. Color changes were calculated by ΔEab, ΔE00, and whitening index (WI). The surface roughness was measured with an atomic force microscope. Data were analyzed by One-way or Two-way repeated measure ANOVA followed by the Tukey's test (α = 0.05). The lowest color change values (either measured by WI, ΔEab, or ΔE00) were observed for VL and OZ used with no HP. Violet light associate with HP was unable to improve the color changes observed for the peroxide alone, in combination with OZ and HP, the highest color changes were verified. Regardless of bleaching protocol, the bleached enamel presented higher contents of PO4 and CO3 -2 than those observed at baseline. All bleaching protocols resulted in similar enamel surface roughness. Both the VL and the OZ caused reduced effects on the enamel color change when used alone. The ozone therapy improved the bleaching effect in the group that received the association of HP.
本研究调查了紫光和臭氧(与或不与过氧化氢联合使用)对牙釉质的漂白效果和理化影响,并与 35%过氧化氢进行了比较。从人类磨牙中随机抽取牙釉质-牙本质块,分别接受以下漂白方案之一(n=15):(HP)35%过氧化氢、(VL)紫光、(OZ)臭氧、臭氧与过氧化氢联合(OZ+HP)或紫光与过氧化氢联合(VL+HP)。所有方案均在两次间隔 48 小时的治疗中进行。漂白前后用分光光度计测量颜色(ΔEab、ΔE00 和增白指数(WI))和矿物成分(拉曼光谱)。颜色变化通过 ΔEab、ΔE00 和 WI 计算。用原子力显微镜测量表面粗糙度。采用单向或双向重复测量方差分析,随后进行 Tukey 检验(α=0.05)。VL 和 OZ 单独使用且不含 HP 时,颜色变化值最低(通过 WI、ΔEab 或 ΔE00 测量)。紫光与 HP 联合使用时,无法改善单独使用过氧化物观察到的颜色变化,但与 OZ 和 HP 联合使用时,颜色变化最大。无论采用哪种漂白方案,漂白后的牙釉质中 PO4 和 CO3 -2 的含量均高于基线水平。所有漂白方案均导致牙釉质表面粗糙度相似。VL 和 OZ 单独使用时,对牙釉质颜色变化的影响均较小。臭氧治疗可改善接受 HP 联合治疗组的漂白效果。