Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS per l'Oncologia e le Neuroscienze, Genoa, Italy.
Italy and Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), Genoa, Italy.
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Dec;47(12):1347-1367. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06486-z. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
To provide consensus, and a list of experts' recommendations regarding the basic skills for head-to-toe ultrasonography in the intensive care setting.
The Executive Committee of the European Society of Intensive Care (ESICM) commissioned the project and supervised the methodology and structure of the consensus. We selected an international panel of 19 expert clinicians-researchers in intensive care unit (ICU) with expertise in critical care ultrasonography (US), plus a non-voting methodologist. The panel was divided into five subgroups (brain, lung, heart, abdomen and vascular ultrasound) which identified the domains and generated a list of questions to be addressed by the panel. A Delphi process based on an iterative approach was used to obtain the final consensus statements. Statements were classified as a strong recommendation (84% of agreement), weak recommendation (74% of agreement), and no recommendation (less than 74%), in favor or against.
This consensus produced a total of 74 statements (7 for brain, 20 for lung, 20 for heart, 20 for abdomen, 7 for vascular Ultrasound). We obtained strong agreement in favor for 49 statements (66.2%), 8 weak in favor (10.8%), 3 weak against (4.1%), and no consensus in 14 cases (19.9%). In most cases when consensus was not obtained, it was felt that the skills were considered as too advanced. A research agenda and discussion on training programs were implemented from the results of the consensus.
This consensus provides guidance for the basic use of critical care US and paves the way for the development of training and research projects.
就重症监护环境下头到脚超声检查的基本技能提供共识和专家建议列表。
欧洲重症监护学会(ESICM)执行委员会委托开展该项目,并监督共识的方法和结构。我们选择了 19 名国际专家临床医生 - 研究人员组成的专家组,他们在重症监护病房(ICU)具有重症监护超声(US)方面的专业知识,外加一名无投票权的方法学家。专家组分为五个小组(脑、肺、心脏、腹部和血管超声),确定了领域并生成了供专家组解决的问题清单。基于迭代方法的 Delphi 流程用于获得最终的共识声明。声明被归类为强推荐(84%的一致性)、弱推荐(74%的一致性)和无推荐(低于 74%,赞成或反对)。
该共识共产生了 74 项声明(脑 7 项、肺 20 项、心脏 20 项、腹部 20 项、血管超声 7 项)。我们获得了 49 项强烈支持(66.2%)、8 项微弱支持(10.8%)、3 项微弱反对(4.1%)和 14 项无共识(19.9%)。在大多数情况下,如果没有达成共识,人们认为这些技能被认为过于先进。从共识的结果中实施了研究议程和培训计划讨论。
本共识为重症监护 US 的基本应用提供了指导,并为培训和研究项目的发展铺平了道路。