San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.
Anesthesia and Intensive Care Operative Unit, S. Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy.
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2397-2410. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06283-0. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
To provide clinical practice recommendations and generate a research agenda on mechanical ventilation and respiratory support in patients with acute brain injury (ABI).
An international consensus panel was convened including 29 clinician-scientists in intensive care medicine with expertise in acute respiratory failure, neurointensive care, or both, and two non-voting methodologists. The panel was divided into seven subgroups, each addressing a predefined clinical practice domain relevant to patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with ABI, defined as acute traumatic brain or cerebrovascular injury. The panel conducted systematic searches and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method was used to evaluate evidence and formulate questions. A modified Delphi process was implemented with four rounds of voting in which panellists were asked to respond to questions (rounds 1-3) and then recommendation statements (final round). Strong recommendation, weak recommendation, or no recommendation were defined when > 85%, 75-85%, and < 75% of panellists, respectively, agreed with a statement.
The GRADE rating was low, very low, or absent across domains. The consensus produced 36 statements (19 strong recommendations, 6 weak recommendations, 11 no recommendation) regarding airway management, non-invasive respiratory support, strategies for mechanical ventilation, rescue interventions for respiratory failure, ventilator liberation, and tracheostomy in brain-injured patients. Several knowledge gaps were identified to inform future research efforts.
This consensus provides guidance for the care of patients admitted to the ICU with ABI. Evidence was generally insufficient or lacking, and research is needed to demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of different management approaches.
提供机械通气和呼吸支持在急性脑损伤(ABI)患者中的临床实践建议,并制定研究议程。
召集了一个国际共识小组,其中包括 29 名重症医学科的临床医生,他们在急性呼吸衰竭、神经重症监护或两者方面具有专业知识,还有两名无投票权的方法学家。小组分为七个小组,每个小组负责解决与因急性创伤性脑或脑血管损伤而入住重症监护病房(ICU)的患者相关的、预先定义的临床实践领域。小组进行了系统搜索,并使用分级评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法评估证据并提出问题。采用改良 Delphi 法进行了四轮投票,要求小组成员回答问题(第 1-3 轮),然后回答推荐声明(最后一轮)。当超过 85%、75-85%和<75%的小组成员同意一项声明时,分别定义为强推荐、弱推荐或无推荐。
各个领域的 GRADE 评级均为低、极低或无。共识产生了 36 项声明(19 项强推荐、6 项弱推荐、11 项无推荐),涉及气道管理、无创呼吸支持、机械通气策略、呼吸衰竭的抢救干预、呼吸机撤离和脑损伤患者的气管切开术。确定了几个知识空白领域,以指导未来的研究工作。
本共识为入住 ICU 的 ABI 患者的护理提供了指导。证据通常不足或缺乏,需要开展研究以证明不同管理方法的可行性、安全性和疗效。