Suppr超能文献

难以辨认:视觉对言语工作记忆的贡献。

Beyond Recognition: Visual Contributions to Verbal Working Memory.

机构信息

Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Jan 12;65(1):253-273. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00177. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

It is well recognized that adding the visual to the acoustic speech signal improves recognition when the acoustic signal is degraded, but how that visual signal affects postrecognition processes is not so well understood. This study was designed to further elucidate the relationships among auditory and visual codes in working memory, a postrecognition process.

DESIGN

In a main experiment, 80 young adults with normal hearing were tested using an immediate serial recall paradigm. Three types of signals were presented (unprocessed speech, vocoded speech, and environmental sounds) in three conditions (audio-only, audio-video with dynamic visual signals, and audio-picture with static visual signals). Three dependent measures were analyzed: (a) magnitude of the recency effect, (b) overall recall accuracy, and (c) response times, to assess cognitive effort. In a follow-up experiment, 30 young adults with normal hearing were tested largely using the same procedures, but with a slight change in order of stimulus presentation.

RESULTS

The main experiment produced three major findings: (a) unprocessed speech evoked a recency effect of consistent magnitude across conditions; vocoded speech evoked a recency effect of similar magnitude to unprocessed speech only with dynamic visual (lipread) signals; environmental sounds never showed a recency effect. (b) Dynamic and static visual signals enhanced overall recall accuracy to a similar extent, and this enhancement was greater for vocoded speech and environmental sounds than for unprocessed speech. (c) All visual signals reduced cognitive load, except for dynamic visual signals with environmental sounds. The follow-up experiment revealed that dynamic visual (lipread) signals exerted their effect on the vocoded stimuli by enhancing phonological quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Acoustic and visual signals can combine to enhance working memory operations, but the source of these effects differs for phonological and nonphonological signals. Nonetheless, visual information can support better postrecognition processes for patients with hearing loss.

摘要

目的

人们已经认识到,当语音信号受损时,将视觉信号添加到语音信号中可以提高识别率,但人们对视觉信号如何影响识别后的过程还不太了解。本研究旨在进一步阐明工作记忆中听觉和视觉代码之间的关系,工作记忆是识别后的一个过程。

设计

在一项主要实验中,80 名听力正常的年轻人使用即时系列回忆范式进行了测试。三种类型的信号(未经处理的语音、语音编码语音和环境声音)在三种条件下呈现(仅音频、带有动态视觉信号的音频-视频和带有静态视觉信号的音频-图片)。分析了三个依赖指标:(a)近因效应的大小,(b)整体回忆准确性,和(c)反应时间,以评估认知努力。在后续实验中,30 名听力正常的年轻人使用大致相同的程序进行了测试,但刺激呈现的顺序略有变化。

结果

主要实验产生了三个主要发现:(a)未经处理的语音在所有条件下都产生了一致大小的近因效应;语音编码语音仅在带有动态视觉(唇读)信号时产生与未经处理的语音相似大小的近因效应;环境声音从未表现出近因效应。(b)动态和静态视觉信号以相似的程度增强了整体回忆准确性,并且这种增强对于语音编码语音和环境声音比对未经处理的语音更大。(c)所有视觉信号都降低了认知负荷,除了环境声音的动态视觉信号。后续实验表明,动态视觉(唇读)信号通过增强语音质量对语音编码刺激产生影响。

结论

声学和视觉信号可以结合起来增强工作记忆操作,但这些效果的来源对于语音和非语音信号是不同的。尽管如此,视觉信息可以为听力损失患者提供更好的识别后过程支持。

相似文献

1
难以辨认:视觉对言语工作记忆的贡献。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Jan 12;65(1):253-273. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00177. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
3
项目集与系列回忆中的声码器的相互作用。
Ear Hear. 2019 Nov/Dec;40(6):1404-1417. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000718.
4
记忆的方式:读唇是否类似于听声音?
Cognition. 2013 Dec;129(3):471-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.017. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
5
儿童言语工作记忆的后缀效应反映了语音编码和知觉分组。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Jul;183:276-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
6
有限带宽和噪声对正常听力儿童言语处理时间和单词回忆的影响。
Ear Hear. 2013 Sep;34(5):585-91. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828576e2.
7
从部分重建整体:模态、年龄和听力损失对单词识别的影响。
Ear Hear. 2013 Mar-Apr;34(2):e14-23. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826d0c27.
8
语音工作记忆的精确性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(10):2022-40. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.1002799. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
9
即时记忆中的听觉近因效应。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1993 May;46(2):193-223. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401044.
10
无关言语、发音抑制和手动敲击对言语短时记忆的干扰:它们有共同的来源吗?
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003 Nov;56(8):1249-68. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000765.

引用本文的文献

1
听力损失和人工耳蜗植入如何影响言语工作记忆:来自青少年的证据。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Jun 6;67(6):1850-1867. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00446. Epub 2024 May 7.

本文引用的文献

1
注意在工作记忆中的效应在不同感觉模式下是不对称的。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Jul;49(5):1050-1065. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01142-9. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
2
声学-语音不匹配会损害对退化单词的系列回忆。
Audit Percept Cogn. 2020;3(1-2):55-75. doi: 10.1080/25742442.2020.1846012. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
3
老年人适应助听器。
Ear Hear. 2021 Jan/Feb;42(1):193-205. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000913.
4
当信息不是以视觉形式呈现时,我们会使用视觉编码吗?
Mem Cognit. 2020 Nov;48(8):1522-1536. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01054-0.
5
助听学龄儿童噪声下言语感知的视听增强。
Ear Hear. 2020 Jul/Aug;41(4):705-719. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000830.
6
陈述性和程序性工作记忆更新过程相互促进。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 May;82(4):1858-1871. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01887-1.
7
模态效应对口语词汇的词汇编码和记忆表征的影响。
Ear Hear. 2020 Jul/Aug;41(4):825-837. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000801.
8
工作记忆理论:定义、模块化程度、注意力作用及目的方面的差异
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Jul 5;49(3):340-355. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0114.
9
语音回路作为缓冲器存储:更新。
Cortex. 2019 Mar;112:91-106. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 May 30.
10
聆听努力:听觉挑战的认知后果如何在大脑和行为中反映出来。
Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):204-214. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000494.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验