Suppr超能文献

姑息治疗提供者是否使用补充和整合医学?一项全国性调查。

Do Palliative Care Providers Use Complementary and Integrative Medicine? A Nationwide Survey.

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics (A.R.G.), Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Department of Human Development (C.R.H.), Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Apr;63(4):599-609. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 14.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Given the high prevalence of burdensome symptoms in palliative care (PC) and increasing use of complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) therapies, research is needed to determine how often and what types of CIM therapies providers recommend to manage symptoms in PC.

OBJECTIVES

To document recommendation rates of CIM for target symptoms and assess if, CIM use varies by provider characteristics.

METHODS

Nationwide survey's of physicians (MD and DO), physician assistants, and nurse practitioners in PC.

RESULTS

Participants (N = 404) were mostly female (71.3%), physicians (74.9%), and cared for adults (90.4%). Providers recommended CIM an average of 6.82 times per-month (95% CI: 6.04-7.60) and used an average of 5.13 (95% CI: 4.90-5.36) out of 10 CIM modalities. Respondents recommended mind-body medicines (e.g., meditation, biofeedback) most, followed by massage, and acupuncture and/or acupressure. The most targeted symptoms included pain; followed by anxiety, mood disturbance, and distress. Recommendation frequencies for specific modality-for-symptom combinations ranged from little use (e.g., aromatherapy for constipation) to occasional use (e.g., mind-body interventions for psychiatric symptoms). Finally, recommendation rates increased as a function of pediatric practice, noninpatient practice setting, provider age, and proportion of effort spent delivering palliative care.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first national survey to characterize PC providers' CIM recommendation behaviors and assess specific therapies and common target symptoms. Providers recommended a broad range of CIM but do so less frequently than patients report using CIM. These findings should be of interest to any provider caring for patients with serious illness.

摘要

背景

鉴于姑息治疗(PC)中负担沉重的症状高发以及补充和整合医学(CIM)疗法的使用不断增加,需要研究确定提供者经常为管理 PC 中的症状推荐哪些 CIM 疗法以及什么类型的疗法。

目的

记录 CIM 对目标症状的推荐率,并评估 CIM 的使用是否因提供者特征而异。

方法

对 PC 中的医生(MD 和 DO)、医师助理和护士从业者进行全国性调查。

结果

参与者(N=404)主要为女性(71.3%)、医生(74.9%),并照顾成年人(90.4%)。提供者平均每月推荐 CIM 6.82 次(95%CI:6.04-7.60),平均使用 10 种 CIM 模式中的 5.13 种(95%CI:4.90-5.36)。受访者最推荐身心医学(例如冥想、生物反馈),其次是按摩、针灸和/或指压。最针对的症状包括疼痛;其次是焦虑、情绪障碍和痛苦。特定模式-症状组合的推荐频率从很少使用(例如,芳香疗法治疗便秘)到偶尔使用(例如,身心干预治疗精神症状)不等。最后,推荐率随着儿科实践、非住院实践环境、提供者年龄和提供姑息治疗的努力比例的增加而增加。

结论

据我们所知,这是首次对姑息治疗提供者的 CIM 推荐行为进行特征描述并评估特定疗法和常见目标症状的全国性调查。提供者推荐了广泛的 CIM,但使用频率低于患者报告的使用频率。这些发现应该引起任何照顾重病患者的提供者的兴趣。

相似文献

4
Complementary and Integrative Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer.胰腺癌的补充与整合医学
Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 Mar;25(3):231-242. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01370-z. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
7
Complementary and integrative medicine for older adults in palliative care.姑息治疗中老年人的补充与整合医学
Clin Geriatr Med. 2015 May;31(2):177-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

本文引用的文献

3
Complementary medicine visits by palliative care patients: a cross-sectional survey.姑息治疗患者的补充医学就诊:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 May;12(e1):e47-e58. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002269. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
10
Acupuncture for depression.针灸治疗抑郁症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 4;3(3):CD004046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004046.pub4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验