Kashyap Himani, Abramovitch Amitai
Department of Clinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Department of Psychology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, United States.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 1;12:721601. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.721601. eCollection 2021.
Neuropsychological functions in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have been extensively investigated. Despite some common findings across studies indicating deficient test performance across cognitive domains with small to medium effect sizes, results remain inconsistent and heterogeneous. However, multiple past attempts to identify moderators that may account for such variability have been unrewarding. Typical moderators including symptom severity, age at onset, medication status, and comorbid conditions failed to provide sufficient explanatory power. It has then been posited that these inconsistencies may be attributed to the inherent heterogeneous nature of the disorder (i.e., symptom dimensions), or to the natural fluctuation in symptom severity. However, recent meta-analyses suggest that these factors may not account for the persistent unexplained variability. Other potential factors-some of which are unique to neuropsychological testing-received scarce research attention, including definition of cognitive impairments, specificity and selection of test and outcome measures, and their limited ecological validity. Other moderators, particularly motivational aspects, and metacognitive factors (e.g., self-efficacy) were not previously addressed despite their potential association to OCD, and their documented impact on cognitive function. The aim of the present mini-review is to provide an updated succinct overview of the current status of the neuropsychological literature in OCD and expanding upon oft-neglected potential moderators and their putative impact on neuropsychological findings in OCD. Our goal is to highlight important avenues for further research and provide a road map for investigators in order to advance our understanding of cognitive functions in OCD that has been stagnant in the past decade.
强迫症(OCD)的神经心理功能已得到广泛研究。尽管多项研究有一些共同发现,表明在认知领域的测试表现存在缺陷,效应大小为小到中等,但结果仍然不一致且具有异质性。然而,过去多次试图找出可能解释这种变异性的调节因素均未成功。包括症状严重程度、发病年龄、用药状况和共病情况在内的典型调节因素未能提供足够的解释力。于是有人提出,这些不一致可能归因于该疾病固有的异质性(即症状维度),或者是症状严重程度的自然波动。然而,最近的荟萃分析表明,这些因素可能无法解释持续存在的无法解释的变异性。其他潜在因素——其中一些是神经心理测试所特有的——很少受到研究关注,包括认知障碍的定义、测试和结果测量的特异性及选择,以及它们有限的生态效度。其他调节因素,特别是动机方面和元认知因素(如自我效能感),尽管它们与强迫症可能有关联,且有文献记载它们对认知功能有影响,但之前并未得到探讨。本综述的目的是简要更新强迫症神经心理学文献的现状,并详细阐述经常被忽视的潜在调节因素及其对强迫症神经心理学研究结果的假定影响。我们的目标是突出进一步研究的重要途径,并为研究人员提供路线图,以推动我们对强迫症认知功能的理解,而这在过去十年一直停滞不前。