Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Jan;23(1):e13467. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13467. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
Using intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) with single isocenter for the treatment of multiple brain lesions has gained acceptance in recent years. One of the challenges of this technique is conducting a patient-specific quality assurance (QA), involving accurate gamma passing rate (GPR) calculations for small and wide spread-out targets. We evaluated effects of parameters such as dose grid and energy on GPR using our clinical IMRS plans.
Ten patients with total of 40 volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were created in Raystation (V.8A) treatment planning system (TPS) for the Varian Edge Linac using 6 and 10 flattening filter-free (FFF) beams and planned dose grids of 1 mm and 2 mm resulting in four plans with 6-10 targets per patient. All parameters and objectives except dose grid and energy were kept the same in all plans. Next, patient-specific QAs were measured evaluating GPR with 10% threshold, 3%/3 mm objective, and an acceptance criterion of 95%. Modulation factors (MF) and confidence intervals were calculated. Two modes of measurements, standard density (SD) and high density (HD), were used.
Generally, plans computed with 1 mm dose grid have higher GPRs than those with 2 mm dose grid for both energies used. The GPRs of 6 FFF plans were higher than those of 10 FFF plans. GPR showed no noticeable difference between HD and SD measurements. Negative correlation between MF and GPR was observed. The HD pass rates fall within the confidence interval of SD.
Calculated dose grid should be less than or equal to one-third of distance to agreement, thus 1 mm planned dose grid is recommended to reduce artifacts in gamma calculation. GPR of SD and HD measurement modes is almost the same, which indicates that SD mode is clinically preferable for performing patient-specific QAs. According to our results, using 6 FFF beams with 1 mm planned dose grid is more accurate and reliable for dose calculation of IMRS plans.
近年来,使用单中心点强度调制放射外科(IMRS)治疗多个脑病变已被广泛接受。该技术的挑战之一是进行特定于患者的质量保证(QA),涉及针对小而广泛分布的目标进行准确的伽马通过率(GPR)计算。我们使用临床 IMRS 计划评估了剂量网格和能量等参数对 GPR 的影响。
在 Raystation(V.8A)治疗计划系统(TPS)中为瓦里安 Edge 直线加速器创建了 10 名患者共 40 个容积调制弧形治疗(VMAT)计划,使用 6 个和 10 个平展滤过器(FFF)射线,并计划剂量网格为 1mm 和 2mm,从而为每个患者产生 4 个计划,每个计划有 6-10 个靶区。除剂量网格和能量外,所有计划的参数和目标均保持不变。接下来,进行了特定于患者的 QA 测量,评估了 10%阈值、3%/3mm 目标和 95%接受标准的 GPR。计算了调制因子(MF)和置信区间。使用了两种测量模式,标准密度(SD)和高密度(HD)。
通常,对于两种使用的能量,使用 1mm 剂量网格计算的计划的 GPR 均高于使用 2mm 剂量网格计算的计划。6 FFF 计划的 GPR 高于 10 FFF 计划的 GPR。HD 和 SD 测量之间的 GPR 没有明显差异。观察到 MF 与 GPR 之间存在负相关。HD 通过率落在 SD 的置信区间内。
计算的剂量网格应小于或等于到协议的距离的三分之一,因此建议使用 1mm 计划剂量网格以减少伽马计算中的伪影。SD 和 HD 测量模式的 GPR 几乎相同,这表明 SD 模式在执行特定于患者的 QA 方面在临床上更可取。根据我们的结果,对于 IMRS 计划的剂量计算,使用 6 个 FFF 射线和 1mm 计划剂量网格更准确可靠。