• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

积极探索警察列队中的面孔会提高辨别准确性。

Active exploration of faces in police lineups increases discrimination accuracy.

机构信息

Centre for Applied Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham.

Division of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2022 Feb-Mar;77(2):196-220. doi: 10.1037/amp0000832. Epub 2021 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1037/amp0000832
PMID:34793182
Abstract

Eyewitness identifications play a key role in the justice system, but eyewitnesses can make errors, often with profound consequences. We used findings from basic science and innovative technologies to develop and test whether a novel interactive lineup procedure, wherein witnesses can rotate and dynamically view the lineup faces from different angles, improves witness discrimination accuracy compared with a widely used procedure in laboratories and police forces around the world-the static frontal-pose photo lineup. No novel procedure has previously been shown to improve witness discrimination accuracy. In Experiment 1, participants ( = 220) identified culprits from sequentially presented interactive lineups or static frontal-pose photo lineups. In Experiment 2, participants ( = 8,507) identified culprits from interactive lineups that were either presented sequentially, simultaneously wherein the faces could be moved independently, or simultaneously wherein the faces moved jointly into the same angle. Sequential interactive lineups enhanced witness discrimination accuracy compared with static photo lineups, and simultaneous interactive lineups enhanced witness discrimination accuracy compared with sequential interactive lineups. These finding were true both when participants viewed suspects who were of the same or different ethnicity/race as themselves. Our findings exemplify how basic science can be used to address the important applied policy issue on how best to conduct a police lineup and reduce eyewitness errors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目击证人的指认在司法系统中起着关键作用,但目击证人也可能犯错,而且往往会造成严重后果。我们利用基础科学和创新技术的研究成果,开发并测试了一种新颖的互动列队程序,与目前在世界各地的实验室和警察部队中广泛使用的静态正面照片列队程序相比,这种新程序能否提高证人的识别准确性。以前还没有新程序被证明可以提高证人的识别准确性。在实验 1 中,参与者(n=220)从依次呈现的互动列队或静态正面照片列队中识别出罪犯。在实验 2 中,参与者(n=8507)从互动列队中识别出罪犯,这些列队可以依次呈现,也可以同时呈现,其中人脸可以独立移动,或者同时以相同的角度移动。与静态照片列队相比,顺序呈现的互动列队提高了证人的识别准确性,同时呈现的互动列队比顺序呈现的互动列队提高了证人的识别准确性。当参与者观察到与自己种族/族裔相同或不同的嫌疑人时,这些发现都是真实的。我们的发现例证了如何利用基础科学来解决如何最好地进行警察列队以及减少目击证人错误的重要应用政策问题。

相似文献

1
Active exploration of faces in police lineups increases discrimination accuracy.积极探索警察列队中的面孔会提高辨别准确性。
Am Psychol. 2022 Feb-Mar;77(2):196-220. doi: 10.1037/amp0000832. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
2
Enabling witnesses to actively explore faces and reinstate study-test pose during a lineup increases discriminability.使证人在列队辨认过程中积极探索面部特征并重新摆出研究-测试姿势,可提高辨别力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 10;120(41):e2301845120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301845120. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
3
Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model.使用多项处理树模型从目击者识别数据衡量阵容公平性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 18;13(1):6290. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33101-6.
4
Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.使用真实目击者的双盲照片列队辨认:顺序与同时列队辨认程序的实验测试
Law Hum Behav. 2015 Feb;39(1):1-14. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000096. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
5
Comparing witness performance in the field versus the lab: How real-world conditions affect eyewitness decision-making.比较现场与实验室中的目击者表现:现实条件如何影响目击者的决策。
Law Hum Behav. 2022 Jun;46(3):175-188. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000485.
6
Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts.为什么列队辨认优于单纯辨认?对填充虹吸和增强可辨别性解释的检验。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2020 Mar;26(1):124-143. doi: 10.1037/xap0000218. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
7
The reveal procedure: A way to enhance evidence of innocence from police lineups.揭示程序:一种增强警方列队辨认中无罪证据的方法。
Law Hum Behav. 2022 Apr;46(2):164-173. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000478. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
8
Designing police lineups to maximize memory performance.设计警察列队以最大限度地提高记忆表现。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2019 Sep;25(3):410-430. doi: 10.1037/xap0000222. Epub 2019 May 16.
9
Reflector variables in augmented reality lineups: Assessing eyewitness identification reliability in children and adults with confidence, response time, and proximity to the lineup.增强现实辨认列队中的反射变量:利用信心、反应时间和与列队的接近程度评估儿童和成人目击证人辨认的可靠性。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 18;19(9):e0308757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308757. eCollection 2024.
10
Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups.评估警方列队辨认中目击证人指认的可靠性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 12;113(2):304-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516814112. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of artificial intelligence to eyewitness identification.人工智能在目击证人识别中的应用。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Apr 3;9(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00542-0.
2
Enabling witnesses to actively explore faces and reinstate study-test pose during a lineup increases discriminability.使证人在列队辨认过程中积极探索面部特征并重新摆出研究-测试姿势,可提高辨别力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 10;120(41):e2301845120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301845120. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
3
Child witness expressions of certainty are informative.
儿童证人表达的肯定意见是有信息价值的。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Nov;150(11):2387-2407. doi: 10.1037/xge0001049. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
4
Perpetrator pose reinstatement during a lineup test increases discrimination accuracy.在列队测试中重现犯罪人姿势会提高辨别准确率。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 9;11(1):13830. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92509-0.