Suppr超能文献

第七版和第八版美国癌症联合委员会分期系统在伴有胰管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤相关性胰腺导管腺癌患者中的表现:一项多机构分析。

Performance of the 7 th and 8 th Editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System in Patients with Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm-Associated PDAC : A Multi-institutional Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.

Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2023 Apr 1;277(4):681-688. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005313. Epub 2021 Nov 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To validate the 7 th and 8 th editions of the AJCC staging system for patients with invasive carcinomas arising in association with IPMN (IPMN-associated PDAC).

BACKGROUND DATA

Although several studies have validated AJCC systems in patients with conventional PDAC, their applicability to IPMN-associated PDAC has not been assessed.

METHODS

Two hundred seventy-five patients who underwent resection for IPMN-associated PDAC between 1996 and 2015 at 3 tertiary centers and had data on the size of the invasive component and lymph node status were identified. Concordance probability estimates (CPE) were calculated and recursive partitioning analysis was employed to identify optimal prognostic cutoffs for T and N.

RESULTS

The CPE for the 7 th and 8 th editions of the AJCC schema were relatively good (0.64 for both) and similar for colloid and tubular subtypes (0.64 for both). The 8 th edition introduced T1a sub-staging and a new distinction between N1 and N2. The utility of the former was confirmed, although the latter did not improve prognostic discrimination. The successful validation of the 8th edition of the AJCC criteria in patients with tubular and colloid subtypes allowed us to compare these patients in early vs late T and N stages which showed that with advanced disease, the prognostic superiority of colloid tumors over their tubular counterparts diminishes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the use of the AJCC 8 th edition in the IPMN-associated PDAC population, but suggest that certain cutoffs may need to be revisited. In advanced AJCC stages, patients with colloid vs tubular subtypes have comparable prognosis.

摘要

目的

验证第 7 版和第 8 版 AJCC 分期系统在与 IPMN 相关的浸润性胰腺导管腺癌(IPMN 相关 PDAC)患者中的适用性。

背景数据

尽管已有多项研究对常规 PDAC 患者的 AJCC 系统进行了验证,但尚未评估其在 IPMN 相关 PDAC 患者中的适用性。

方法

在 3 家三级中心,对 1996 年至 2015 年间接受 IPMN 相关 PDAC 切除术且具有侵袭性成分大小和淋巴结状态数据的 275 例患者进行了识别。计算了一致性概率估计值(CPE),并采用递归分区分析确定 T 和 N 的最佳预后截断值。

结果

第 7 版和第 8 版 AJCC 分期方案的 CPE 相对较好(均为 0.64),且胶状和管状亚型的 CPE 也相似(均为 0.64)。第 8 版引入了 T1a 亚分期和 N1 与 N2 之间的新区别。前者的实用性得到了证实,尽管后者并未提高预后区分度。第 8 版 AJCC 标准在管状和胶状亚型患者中的成功验证使我们能够比较这些患者在早期和晚期 T 和 N 分期中的情况,结果表明,随着疾病的进展,胶状肿瘤的预后优势相对于管状肿瘤逐渐减弱。

结论

我们的研究结果支持在 IPMN 相关 PDAC 人群中使用 AJCC 第 8 版,但提示某些截断值可能需要重新考虑。在晚期 AJCC 分期中,胶状与管状亚型的患者具有相似的预后。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验