McCabe Katharine
University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
J Health Soc Behav. 2022 Jun;63(2):162-176. doi: 10.1177/00221465211058152. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
This article reveals how law and legal interests transform medicine. Drawing on qualitative interviews with medical professionals, this study shows how providers mobilize law and engage in investigatory work as they deliver care. Using the case of drug testing pregnant patients, I examine three mechanisms by which medico-legal hybridity occurs in clinical settings. The first mechanism, clinicalization, describes how forensic tools and methods are cast in clinical terminology, effectively cloaking their forensic intent. In the second, medical professionals informally rank the riskiness of illicit substances using both medical and criminal-legal assessments. The third mechanism describes how gender, race, and class inform forensic decision-making and criminal suspicion in maternal health. The findings show that by straddling both medical and legal domains, medicine conforms to the standards and norms of neither institution while also suspending meaningful rights for patients seeking care.
本文揭示了法律和法律利益如何改变医学。通过对医学专业人员的定性访谈,本研究展示了医疗服务提供者在提供护理时如何动用法律并参与调查工作。以对孕妇进行药物检测为例,我研究了临床环境中出现医学与法律混合的三种机制。第一种机制是临床化,描述了法医工具和方法如何用临床术语来表述,从而有效地掩盖其法医意图。第二种机制是,医学专业人员使用医学和刑事法律评估对非法药物的风险进行非正式排序。第三种机制描述了性别、种族和阶级如何影响孕产妇健康方面的法医决策和刑事怀疑。研究结果表明,医学通过跨越医学和法律两个领域,既不符合任何一个机构的标准和规范,同时也暂停了寻求护理的患者的有意义权利。