School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 18;11(11):e053969. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053969.
This study aims to implement a version of patient-centred labels (PCL) consistent with current labelling practice in Australia; assess the effectiveness of PCL in relation to the proportion of participants that correctly comprehend dosing instructions, and explore the proportion of correct comprehension of PCL in participants with both low and high health literacy.
Randomised controlled trial.
A large tertiary care hospital in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
121 participants with a majority born in Australia (65.3%), New Zealand (14.0%), the UK (6.6%) and Ireland (2.5%).
Participants were randomly assigned to either a panel of three PCL (n=61) or three standard labels (n=60) and asked to comprehend their assigned panel of labels.
Difference in the proportion of participants that correctly comprehend dosing instructions provided on PCL compared with standard labels. The two-proportion test was used to measure the impact of PCL on the proportion of participants correctly comprehending dosing instructions.
A greater proportion of participants were able to accurately comprehend PCL compared with standard labels. The proportion of participants who were able to correctly comprehend dose instructions provided on all three labels was significantly higher in the group that received PCL; 23.3% standard vs 83.6% PCL, p<0.001. The effect was observed in both low and high health literacy participants. The proportion of participants with accurate label comprehension was higher in participants with low Newest Vital Signs scores (8.3% standard vs 85.7% PCL, p<0.001) and low Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine scores (10.5% standard vs 96.0% PCL, p<0.001) who received PCL.
This study supports the use of PCL in Australian pharmacy practice. PCL provide simple, clear and explicit dosing instructions to patients. Implementing PCL may reduce the risk of misinterpreting dosing instructions by patients and improve quality use of medicines.
ACTRN12621000083897; Results.
本研究旨在实施一种符合澳大利亚当前标签实践的以患者为中心的标签(PCL)版本;评估 PCL 在参与者正确理解给药说明的比例方面的有效性,并探索在低健康素养和高健康素养的参与者中正确理解 PCL 的比例。
随机对照试验。
澳大利亚昆士兰州布里斯班的一家大型三级保健医院。
121 名参与者,其中大多数出生于澳大利亚(65.3%)、新西兰(14.0%)、英国(6.6%)和爱尔兰(2.5%)。
参与者被随机分配到三个 PCL 小组(n=61)或三个标准标签小组(n=60),并要求理解他们分配的标签小组。
与标准标签相比,参与者正确理解 PCL 提供的给药说明的比例的差异。二项式检验用于测量 PCL 对参与者正确理解给药说明的比例的影响。
与标准标签相比,更多的参与者能够准确理解 PCL。在接受 PCL 的组中,能够正确理解所有三个标签提供的剂量说明的参与者比例明显更高;标准 23.3%,PCL 83.6%,p<0.001。在低和高健康素养参与者中都观察到了这种效果。在接受 PCL 的低最新生命体征评分(标准 8.3%,PCL 85.7%,p<0.001)和低快速估计成人医学阅读能力评分(标准 10.5%,PCL 96.0%,p<0.001)的参与者中,正确理解标签的参与者比例更高。
本研究支持在澳大利亚药房实践中使用 PCL。PCL 为患者提供简单、清晰和明确的剂量说明。实施 PCL 可能会降低患者误解剂量说明的风险,并提高药物的合理使用。
ACTRN12621000083897;结果。