Bahrami Alireza, Makiabadi Elham, Jalali Saba, Heidari Zeinab, Assadi Mojan, Rashidkhani Bahram
Student Research Committee, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1981619573, Iran.
Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1981619573, Iran.
Clin Nutr Res. 2021 Oct 28;10(4):330-340. doi: 10.7762/cnr.2021.10.4.330. eCollection 2021 Oct.
Despite mounting evidence that dietary polyphenols might have a protective role against the risk of breast cancer (BC), few studies have assessed the relationship between intake of polyphenol classes and subclasses with BC. Thus, we examined the relationship between dietary polyphenol classes and individual polyphenol subclasses and the risk of BC. Overall, 134 newly diagnosed BC patients and 267 healthy hospitalized controls were studied. Dietary intake was assessed using a validated 168-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). To estimate dietary intake of polyphenols, polyphenol content (flavonoids, lignans, stilbenes and phenolic acids) of 80 food items were derived from an updated version of the phenol explorer database containing information on the effects of food processing on polyphenol content. The dietary polyphenol intake was calculated by matching the subjects' food consumption data with our polyphenol content database. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Controls had higher intake of total polyphenol (marginally significant; p = 0.07), hydroxycinnamic acid (marginally significant; p = 0.05) and lignan (p = 0.01). After adjusting for potential confounders, high consumption of lignans (highest vs. lowest tertile: OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.26-0.97; p for trend = 0.04) associated with decreased risk of BC. There was no significant relationship between intake of other polyphenols and risk of BC. Our findings suggest that high lignan intake is associated with a reduced risk of BC.
尽管越来越多的证据表明膳食多酚可能对乳腺癌(BC)风险具有保护作用,但很少有研究评估多酚类别和亚类的摄入量与BC之间的关系。因此,我们研究了膳食多酚类别和单个多酚亚类与BC风险之间的关系。总体而言,对134例新诊断的BC患者和267例健康住院对照者进行了研究。使用经过验证的168项食物频率问卷(FFQ)评估膳食摄入量。为了估计多酚的膳食摄入量,80种食物的多酚含量(黄酮类、木脂素、芪类和酚酸)来自酚类物质探索者数据库的更新版本,该数据库包含有关食品加工对多酚含量影响的信息。通过将受试者的食物消费数据与我们的多酚含量数据库进行匹配来计算膳食多酚摄入量。采用多因素logistic回归估计比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。对照者的总多酚(边缘显著;p = 0.07)、羟基肉桂酸(边缘显著;p = 0.05)和木脂素(p = 0.01)摄入量较高。在调整潜在混杂因素后,木脂素高摄入量(最高三分位数与最低三分位数相比:OR,0.51;95%CI,0.26 - 0.97;趋势p = 0.04)与BC风险降低相关。其他多酚的摄入量与BC风险之间无显著关系。我们的研究结果表明,高木脂素摄入量与BC风险降低相关。