School of Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology (DIPSCOMI), University of Verona, Verona.
Research Group in Family Health, University of Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Aug;24(4):455-467. doi: 10.1111/cid.13103. Epub 2022 May 30.
Short and ultra-short implants implants supporting single crowns seem to demonstrate high percentages of survival and stable marginal bone levels at a mid-term follow-up. Nevertheless, insurgence of peri-implant complications still represents a critical issue, especially for patients with history of periodontitis.
The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate implant survival, marginal bone loss and peri-implant complications in 333 short and ultra-short implants, placed in periodontally healthy patients and patients with a history of periodontitis.
Implants were placed in the maxillary and mandibular posterior regions of 142 patients with (PP) and without (NPP) a history of periodontitis. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed at 5-year recall appointments.
Implants respectively placed in PP and NPP were: 35.68% and 42.50% in 8.0 mm-length group, 33.33% and 36.67% in 6.0 mm-length group, and 30.99% and 20.83% in 5.0 mm-length group. Implant-based survival after 5 years of follow-up was 95.77% for PP and 96.67% for NPP (p = 0.77). Regarding crestal bone level variations, average crestal bone loss was statistically different (p = 0.04) among PP (0.74 mm) and NPP (0.61 mm). Implants presenting signs of mucositis were 6.86% in PP and 7.76% in NPP (p = 0.76). Setting the threshold for excessive bone loss at 1 mm after 60 months, peri-implantitis prevalence was 7.84% in PP and 2.59% in NPP (p = 0.08). Overall implant success was 92.16% and 97.41%, respectively, for PP and NPP.
Under strict maintenance program, five-year outcomes suggest that short and ultra-short locking-taper implants can be successfully restored with single crowns in the posterior jaws both in PP and NPP.
短期和超短种植体支撑单冠在中期随访时似乎显示出高存活率和稳定的边缘骨水平。然而,种植体周围并发症的发生仍然是一个关键问题,尤其是对于有牙周病史的患者。
本回顾性研究旨在评估 333 颗短期和超短种植体在牙周健康患者和有牙周病史患者中的种植体存活率、边缘骨丧失和种植体周围并发症。
将种植体分别植入 142 名有(PP)和无(NPP)牙周病史的患者的上颌和下颌后牙区。在 5 年的随访中进行临床和影像学检查。
分别植入 PP 和 NPP 的种植体为:8.0mm 长度组的 35.68%和 42.50%、6.0mm 长度组的 33.33%和 36.67%、5.0mm 长度组的 30.99%和 20.83%。PP 组和 NPP 组种植体 5 年随访后的种植体存活率分别为 95.77%和 96.67%(p=0.77)。关于牙槽骨水平变化,PP(0.74mm)和 NPP(0.61mm)之间的平均牙槽骨丧失存在统计学差异(p=0.04)。出现黏膜炎迹象的种植体分别为 PP 组的 6.86%和 NPP 组的 7.76%(p=0.76)。将 60 个月后 1mm 作为过度骨丧失的阈值,PP 组的种植体周围炎患病率为 7.84%,NPP 组为 2.59%(p=0.08)。PP 组和 NPP 组的总体种植体成功率分别为 92.16%和 97.41%。
在严格的维护计划下,5 年的结果表明,在 PP 和 NPP 中,后牙区的短期和超短锁定锥形种植体可以成功地用单冠修复。