• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特质愤怒和愤怒控制个体差异的结构和功能脑网络:一项无监督机器学习研究。

Structural and functional brain networks of individual differences in trait anger and anger control: An unsupervised machine learning study.

机构信息

Clinical and Affective Neuroscience Lab, Department of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences (DiPSCo), University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.

Affective Brain Lab, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Jan;55(2):510-527. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15537. Epub 2021 Dec 27.

DOI:10.1111/ejn.15537
PMID:34797003
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9303475/
Abstract

The ability to experience, use and eventually control anger is crucial to maintain well-being and build healthy relationships. Despite its relevance, the neural mechanisms behind individual differences in experiencing and controlling anger are poorly understood. To elucidate these points, we employed an unsupervised machine learning approach based on independent component analysis to test the hypothesis that specific functional and structural networks are associated with individual differences in trait anger and anger control. Structural and functional resting state images of 71 subjects as well as their scores from the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory entered the analyses. At a structural level, the concentration of grey matter in a network including ventromedial temporal areas, posterior cingulate, fusiform gyrus and cerebellum was associated with trait anger. The higher the concentration, the higher the proneness to experience anger in daily life due to the greater tendency to orient attention towards aversive events and interpret them with higher hostility. At a functional level, the activity of the default mode network (DMN) was associated with anger control. The higher the DMN temporal frequency, the stronger the exerted control over anger, thus extending previous evidence on the role of the DMN in regulating cognitive and emotional functions in the domain of anger. Taken together, these results show, for the first time, two specialized brain networks for encoding individual differences in trait anger and anger control.

摘要

体验、使用和最终控制愤怒的能力对于维持健康和建立健康的人际关系至关重要。尽管这一点很重要,但个体在体验和控制愤怒方面的差异背后的神经机制仍知之甚少。为了阐明这些观点,我们采用了一种基于独立成分分析的无监督机器学习方法来检验以下假设:特定的功能和结构网络与特质愤怒和愤怒控制的个体差异有关。分析中使用了 71 名被试的结构和功能静息态图像以及他们在状态-特质愤怒表达量表中的得分。在结构水平上,包括腹内侧颞叶、后扣带回、梭状回和小脑在内的网络中灰质的浓度与特质愤怒有关。浓度越高,由于人们更倾向于将注意力集中在令人不快的事件上,并以更高的敌意来解释这些事件,因此在日常生活中体验愤怒的倾向就越高。在功能水平上,默认模式网络(DMN)的活动与愤怒控制有关。DMN 的时间频率越高,对愤怒的控制就越强,从而扩展了 DMN 在愤怒领域调节认知和情绪功能方面的作用的先前证据。总之,这些结果首次表明,有两个专门的大脑网络用于编码特质愤怒和愤怒控制的个体差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64c2/9303475/e9cf5b79f96b/EJN-55-510-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64c2/9303475/508b2cdc7716/EJN-55-510-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64c2/9303475/372ad4370452/EJN-55-510-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64c2/9303475/78c9679b085e/EJN-55-510-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64c2/9303475/e9cf5b79f96b/EJN-55-510-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64c2/9303475/508b2cdc7716/EJN-55-510-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64c2/9303475/372ad4370452/EJN-55-510-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64c2/9303475/78c9679b085e/EJN-55-510-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64c2/9303475/e9cf5b79f96b/EJN-55-510-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Structural and functional brain networks of individual differences in trait anger and anger control: An unsupervised machine learning study.特质愤怒和愤怒控制个体差异的结构和功能脑网络:一项无监督机器学习研究。
Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Jan;55(2):510-527. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15537. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
2
Decoding individual differences in expressing and suppressing anger from structural brain networks: A supervised machine learning approach.从结构脑网络解码表达和抑制愤怒的个体差异:一种有监督的机器学习方法。
Behav Brain Res. 2023 Feb 15;439:114245. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2022.114245. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
3
Inter-individual differences in the experience of negative emotion predict variations in functional brain architecture.负面情绪体验中的个体差异预示着功能性脑结构的变化。
Neuroimage. 2015 Dec;123:80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.031. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
4
Anxious Brains: A Combined Data Fusion Machine Learning Approach to Predict Trait Anxiety from Morphometric Features.焦虑大脑:一种联合数据融合机器学习方法,用于从形态特征预测特质焦虑。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 5;23(2):610. doi: 10.3390/s23020610.
5
Intrinsic functional connectivity predicts individual differences in distractibility.内在功能连接性可预测注意力分散性的个体差异。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jun;86:176-82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.023. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
6
Whole-brain functional connectivity during script-driven aggression in borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍脚本驱动攻击时的全脑功能连接。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 13;93:46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
7
Brain Functional Basis of Subjective Well-being During Negative Facial Emotion Processing Task-Based fMRI.基于任务态 fMRI 的负性面孔情绪加工时主观幸福感的脑功能基础。
Neuroscience. 2019 Dec 15;423:177-191. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.10.017. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
8
A robust dissociation among the language, multiple demand, and default mode networks: Evidence from inter-region correlations in effect size.语言、多重需求和默认模式网络之间的稳健分离:来自效应量的区域间相关性的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Oct;119:501-511. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
9
Amygdala-orbitofrontal resting-state functional connectivity is associated with trait anger.杏仁核-眶额皮质静息态功能连接与特质愤怒相关。
Neuroreport. 2012 Jul 11;23(10):606-10. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283551cfc.
10
Microstructural integrity of white matter moderates an association between childhood adversity and adult trait anger.白质微观结构完整性调节了儿童期逆境与成人特质愤怒之间的关联。
Aggress Behav. 2019 May;45(3):310-318. doi: 10.1002/ab.21820. Epub 2019 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A fronto-insular network underlies individual variations in anger expression and control.额岛叶网络是愤怒表达和控制个体差异的基础。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Nov 5;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00348. eCollection 2024.
2
Gray and white matter alterations in Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder: a data fusion machine learning approach.强迫型人格障碍中的灰质和白质改变:一种数据融合机器学习方法。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 May 14;19:1559760. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1559760. eCollection 2025.
3
Resting-state BOLD temporal variability of the default mode network predicts spontaneous mind wandering, which is negatively associated with mindfulness skills.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying the representational structure of affect using fMRI.使用功能磁共振成像识别情感的表征结构。
Affect Sci. 2020 Mar;1(1):42-56. doi: 10.1007/s42761-020-00007-9. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
2
Out of control: An altered parieto-occipital-cerebellar network for impulsivity in bipolar disorder.失控:双相情感障碍患者冲动性的顶枕叶-小脑网络改变。
Behav Brain Res. 2021 May 21;406:113228. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113228. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
3
Common and different gray and white matter alterations in bipolar and borderline personality disorder: A source-based morphometry study.
默认模式网络静息态BOLD时间变异性可预测自发的思维游荡,而思维游荡与正念技能呈负相关。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jan 22;19:1515902. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1515902. eCollection 2025.
4
Clustering Electrophysiological Predisposition to Binge Drinking: An Unsupervised Machine Learning Analysis.聚类对 binge drinking 的电生理易感性:一项无监督机器学习分析。
Brain Behav. 2024 Nov;14(11):e70157. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70157.
5
An evaluation of the Ultimatum Game as a measure of irritability and anger.作为一种评估易激惹性和愤怒的方法,对最后通牒博弈的评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 16;19(8):e0304038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304038. eCollection 2024.
6
The relationship between trait anger and reactive aggressive behavior in middle school students: the mediating role and intervention of hostile attribution bias.中学生特质愤怒与反应性攻击行为的关系:敌意归因偏差的中介作用与干预
BMC Psychol. 2024 Aug 2;12(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01918-z.
7
Neural basis of reward expectancy inducing proactive aggression.奖励预期引发主动攻击性的神经基础。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Aug;24(4):694-706. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01192-x. Epub 2024 May 31.
8
Reduced GM-WM concentration inside the Default Mode Network in individuals with high emotional intelligence and low anxiety: a data fusion mCCA+jICA approach.高情绪智力和低焦虑个体的默认模式网络内 GM-WM 浓度降低:数据融合 mCCA+jICA 方法。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024 Mar 4;19(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsae018.
9
Stability, change, and reliable individual differences in electroencephalography measures: A lifespan perspective on progress and opportunities.脑电图测量的稳定性、变化和可靠的个体差异:从寿命角度看进展和机遇。
Neuroimage. 2023 Jul 15;275:120116. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120116. Epub 2023 May 9.
10
Resting-state BOLD temporal variability in sensorimotor and salience networks underlies trait emotional intelligence and explains differences in emotion regulation strategies.静息态 BOLD 时间变异性在感觉运动和突显网络中,是特质情绪智力的基础,并解释了情绪调节策略的差异。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 7;12(1):15163. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19477-x.
双相和边缘型人格障碍的常见和不同的灰质和白质改变:基于体素的形态测量学研究。
Brain Res. 2021 Jul 1;1762:147401. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147401. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
4
Do anger perception and the experience of anger share common neural mechanisms? Coordinate-based meta-analytic evidence of similar and different mechanisms from functional neuroimaging studies.愤怒感知和愤怒体验是否共享共同的神经机制?基于功能神经影像学研究的相似和不同机制的坐标荟萃分析证据。
Neuroimage. 2021 Apr 15;230:117777. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117777. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
5
Shared Characteristics of Intrinsic Connectivity Networks Underlying Interoceptive Awareness and Empathy.内感受性觉知和共情背后的内在连接网络的共同特征。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Dec 7;14:571070. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.571070. eCollection 2020.
6
Functional topography of anger and aggression in the human cerebellum.人类小脑愤怒和攻击的功能拓扑。
Neuroimage. 2021 Feb 1;226:117582. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117582. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
7
Does resting state functional connectivity differ between mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's dementia?轻度认知障碍和早期阿尔茨海默病痴呆患者静息态功能连接是否存在差异?
J Neurol Sci. 2020 Nov 15;418:117093. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117093. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
8
The Role of Amygdala in Self-Conscious Emotions in a Patient With Acquired Bilateral Damage.杏仁核在一名获得性双侧损伤患者自我意识情绪中的作用
Front Neurosci. 2020 Jul 8;14:677. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00677. eCollection 2020.
9
Trait and state anxiety are mapped differently in the human brain.特质焦虑和状态焦虑在人类大脑中的映射方式不同。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 6;10(1):11112. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68008-z.
10
A Dual Route Model for Regulating Emotions: Comparing Models, Techniques and Biological Mechanisms.一种调节情绪的双重途径模型:比较模型、技术和生物学机制。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 4;11:930. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00930. eCollection 2020.