Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Acc Chem Res. 2021 Dec 7;54(23):4334-4341. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00429. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
Even after being in business for at least the last 100 years, research into the field of (heterogeneous) catalysis is still vibrant, both in academia and in industry. One of the reasons for this is that around 90% of all chemicals and materials used in everyday life are produced employing catalysis. In 2020, the global catalyst market size reached $35 billion, and it is still steadily increasing every year. Additionally, catalysts will be the driving force behind the transition toward sustainable energy. However, even after having been investigated for 100 years, we still have not reached the holy grail of developing catalysts from rational design instead of from trial-and-error. There are two main reasons for this, indicated by the two so-called "gaps" between (academic) research and actual catalysis. The first one is the "pressure gap", indicating the 13 orders of magnitude difference in pressure between the ultrahigh vacuum lab conditions and the atmospheric pressures (and higher) of industrial catalysis. The second one is the "materials gap", indicating the difference in complexity between single-crystal model catalysts of academic research and the real catalysts, consisting of metallic nanoparticles on supports, promoters, fillers, and binders. Although over the past decades significant efforts have been made in closing these gaps, many steps still have to be taken. In this Account, I will discuss the steps we have taken at Leiden University to further our fundamental understanding of heterogeneous catalysis at the (near-)atomic scale. I will focus on bridging the pressure gap, though we are also working on closing the materials gap. Over the past years, we developed state-of-the-art equipment that is able to investigate the (near-)atomic-scale structure of the catalyst surface during the chemical reaction using several surface-science-based techniques such as scanning tunneling microscopy, atomic force microscopy, optical microscopy, and X-ray-based techniques (surface X-ray diffraction, grazing-incidence small-angle X-ray scattering, and X-ray reflectivity, in collaboration with ESRF). Simultaneously with imaging the surface, we can investigate the catalyst's performance via mass spectrometry, enabling us to link changes in the catalyst structure to its activity, selectivity, or stability. Although we are currently investigating many industrially relevant catalytic systems, I will here focus the discussion on the oxidation of platinum during, for example, CO and NO oxidation, the NO reduction reaction on platinum, and the growth of graphene on liquid (molten) copper. I will show that to be able to obtain the full picture of heterogeneous catalysis, the ability to investigate the catalyst at the (near-)atomic scale the chemical reaction is a must.
即使已经存在了至少 100 年,(多相)催化领域的研究仍然充满活力,无论是在学术界还是在工业界。原因之一是,日常生活中使用的大约 90%的化学品和材料都是通过催化作用生产的。2020 年,全球催化剂市场规模达到 350 亿美元,并且每年仍在稳步增长。此外,催化剂将成为向可持续能源转型的动力。然而,即使经过 100 年的研究,我们仍然没有达到从合理设计而不是反复试验中开发催化剂的圣杯。这有两个主要原因,由(学术)研究和实际催化之间的两个所谓的“差距”指出。第一个是“压力差距”,表明超高压实验室条件和工业催化的大气压力(及更高)之间的压力相差 13 个数量级。第二个是“材料差距”,表明学术研究中单晶模型催化剂的复杂性与由金属纳米粒子在载体、促进剂、填充剂和粘结剂上组成的实际催化剂之间的差异。尽管在过去的几十年中,已经做出了重大努力来缩小这些差距,但仍有许多步骤需要采取。在本专题中,我将讨论莱顿大学为进一步深入了解多相催化在(近)原子尺度上的基本原理而采取的步骤。我将重点讨论缩小压力差距,尽管我们也在努力缩小材料差距。在过去的几年中,我们开发了最先进的设备,能够使用几种基于表面科学的技术(如扫描隧道显微镜、原子力显微镜、光学显微镜和 X 射线技术(表面 X 射线衍射、掠入射小角 X 射线散射和 X 射线反射率,与 ESRF 合作))在化学反应过程中研究催化剂表面的(近)原子尺度结构。同时对表面进行成像,我们可以通过质谱法来研究催化剂的性能,使我们能够将催化剂结构的变化与其活性、选择性或稳定性联系起来。尽管我们目前正在研究许多工业相关的催化体系,但我将在这里重点讨论例如 CO 和 NO 氧化过程中铂的氧化、铂上的 NO 还原反应以及液态(熔融)铜上石墨烯的生长等问题。我将展示,为了能够获得多相催化的全貌,必须能够在(近)原子尺度上研究催化剂在化学反应中的作用。