• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肠易激综合征和炎症性肠病患者中伴有肠易激综合征样症状患者的粪便微生物群特征分析。

Fecal microbiota profiling in irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease patients with irritable bowel syndrome-type symptoms.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300# Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov 19;21(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-02015-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12876-021-02015-w
PMID:34798830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8603515/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The intestinal microbiota is thought to be involved in the occurrence of inflammatory bowel disease in remission with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-type symptoms, but the specific distinct profile of these bacteria remains unclear. This cross-sectional study aims to investigate the fecal microbiota profiling in patients with these diseases.

METHODS

Fecal samples from 97 subjects, including Crohn's disease patients in remission with IBS-type symptoms (CDR-IBS) or without IBS-type symptoms (CDR-IBS), ulcerative colitis patients in remission with IBS-type symptoms (UCR-IBS) or without IBS-type symptoms (UCR-IBS), IBS patients and healthy controls, were collected and applied 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene sequencing. The V4 hypervariable regions of 16S rDNA gene were amplified and sequenced by the Illumina MiSeq platform. The differences in the sample diversity index in groups were analyzed with R software.

RESULTS

The richness of the intestinal microbiota in the CDR-IBS group was markedly lower than those in the control and IBS groups based on the analysis of observed species and the Chao index (P < 0.05). The observed species index in the CDR-IBS group was higher than that in the CDR-IBS group (median index: 254.8 vs 203, P = 0.036). No difference was found in alpha diversity between UCR patients with IBS-type symptoms and those without related symptoms. At the genus level, the number of Faecalibacterium in CDR patients with IBS-type symptoms increased significantly, while Fusobacterium decreased versus those without such symptoms (mean relative abundance of Faecalibacterium: 20.35% vs 5.18%, P < 0.05; Fusobacterium: 1.51% vs 5.2%, P < 0.05). However, compared with the UCR-IBS group, the number of Faecalibacterium in the UCR-IBS group decreased, while the number of Streptococcus increased, but there was no significant difference in the genus structure. The abundance and composition of the microbiota of IBS patients were not distinct from those of healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The IBS-type symptoms in CD patients in remission may be related to an increase in Faecalibacterium and a decrease in Fusobacterium. The IBS-type symptoms in UC patients in remission cannot be explained by changes in the abundance and structure of the intestinal microbiota.

摘要

背景

肠道微生物群被认为与缓解期炎症性肠病伴有肠易激综合征(IBS)样症状有关,但这些细菌的具体特征仍不清楚。本横断面研究旨在探讨这些疾病患者的粪便微生物群特征。

方法

收集 97 例患者的粪便样本,包括缓解期伴有 IBS 样症状的克罗恩病患者(CDR-IBS)或无 IBS 样症状的患者(CDR-IBS)、缓解期伴有 IBS 样症状的溃疡性结肠炎患者(UCR-IBS)或无 IBS 样症状的患者(UCR-IBS)、IBS 患者和健康对照者。应用 16S 核糖体 DNA(rDNA)基因测序。采用 Illumina MiSeq 平台扩增和测序 16S rDNA 基因 V4 高变区。采用 R 软件分析组间样本多样性指数的差异。

结果

基于观察物种和 Chao 指数分析,CDR-IBS 组肠道微生物群的丰富度明显低于对照组和 IBS 组(P<0.05)。CDR-IBS 组的观察物种指数高于 CDR-IBS 组(中位数指数:254.8 比 203,P=0.036)。伴有 IBS 样症状的 UCR 患者与不伴有相关症状的患者之间的 alpha 多样性无差异。在属水平上,CDR 伴有 IBS 样症状患者的 Faecalibacterium 数量显著增加,而 Fusobacterium 数量减少(Faecalibacterium 的平均相对丰度:20.35%比 5.18%,P<0.05;Fusobacterium:1.51%比 5.2%,P<0.05)。然而,与 UCR-IBS 组相比,UCR-IBS 组的 Faecalibacterium 数量减少,而链球菌数量增加,但属结构无显著差异。IBS 患者的微生物群丰富度和组成与健康对照者无明显差异。

结论

缓解期 CD 患者的 IBS 样症状可能与 Faecalibacterium 增加和 Fusobacterium 减少有关。缓解期 UC 患者的 IBS 样症状不能用肠道微生物群丰度和结构的变化来解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee87/8603515/d2d0b1e06bff/12876_2021_2015_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee87/8603515/b1c84d556c22/12876_2021_2015_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee87/8603515/eb9d51a1f9af/12876_2021_2015_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee87/8603515/d2d0b1e06bff/12876_2021_2015_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee87/8603515/b1c84d556c22/12876_2021_2015_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee87/8603515/eb9d51a1f9af/12876_2021_2015_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee87/8603515/d2d0b1e06bff/12876_2021_2015_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Fecal microbiota profiling in irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease patients with irritable bowel syndrome-type symptoms.肠易激综合征和炎症性肠病患者中伴有肠易激综合征样症状患者的粪便微生物群特征分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov 19;21(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-02015-w.
2
Gut microbiota in mucosa and feces of newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve adult inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome patients.新诊断、未经治疗的成人炎症性肠病和肠易激综合征患者的黏膜和粪便中的肠道微生物群。
Gut Microbes. 2022 Jan-Dec;14(1):2083419. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2083419.
3
Identification of an Intestinal Microbiota Signature Associated With Severity of Irritable Bowel Syndrome.鉴定与肠易激综合征严重程度相关的肠道微生物群特征。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Jan;152(1):111-123.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.09.049. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
4
Gut microbial signatures of patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and their healthy relatives.腹泻型肠易激综合征患者及其健康亲属的肠道微生物特征。
J Appl Microbiol. 2024 Jun 3;135(6). doi: 10.1093/jambio/lxae118.
5
Fecal and Mucosa-Associated Intestinal Microbiota in Patients with Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome.腹泻型肠易激综合征患者的粪便和黏膜相关肠道微生物群。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jul;63(7):1890-1899. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5086-4. Epub 2018 May 17.
6
Systemic Inflammatory Protein Profiles Distinguish Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and Ulcerative Colitis, Irrespective of Inflammation or IBS-Like Symptoms.系统性炎症蛋白谱可区分肠易激综合征(IBS)和溃疡性结肠炎,与炎症或类似 IBS 的症状无关。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2020 May 12;26(6):874-884. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izz322.
7
Colonic mucosal microbiota is associated with bowel habit subtype and abdominal pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.结肠黏膜微生物群与肠易激综合征患者的排便习惯亚型和腹痛有关。
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2022 Aug 1;323(2):G134-G143. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00352.2021. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
8
The prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome-type symptoms in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease, and the relationship with biochemical markers of disease activity.儿童炎症性肠病中肠易激综合征样症状的流行情况,及其与疾病活动的生化标志物的关系。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Jul;44(2):181-8. doi: 10.1111/apt.13636. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
9
Distinctions Between Fecal and Intestinal Mucosal Microbiota in Subgroups of Irritable Bowel Syndrome.肠易激综合征亚组粪便与肠道黏膜微生物群的区别。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Dec;67(12):5580-5592. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07588-4. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
10
Negative Effects on Psychological Health and Quality of Life of Genuine Irritable Bowel Syndrome-type Symptoms in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.炎症性肠病患者出现真正的肠易激综合征样症状对心理健康和生活质量的负面影响。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Mar;15(3):376-384.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The Variability of Tryptophan Metabolism in Patients with Mixed Type of Irritable Bowel Syndrome.混合型肠易激综合征患者色氨酸代谢的变异性
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Feb 22;25(5):2550. doi: 10.3390/ijms25052550.
2
Impact of bread diet on intestinal dysbiosis and irritable bowel syndrome symptoms in quiescent ulcerative colitis: A pilot study.面包饮食对缓解期溃疡性结肠炎患者肠道菌群失调及肠易激综合征症状的影响:一项初步研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 16;19(2):e0297836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297836. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Causes Microbial Dysbiosis and Exacerbates Visceral Hypersensitivity in a Colonization-Independent Manner.以一种不依赖于定植的方式导致微生物群落失调并加剧内脏超敏反应。
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jun 24;11:1281. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01281. eCollection 2020.
2
The microbiome in inflammatory bowel diseases: from pathogenesis to therapy.炎症性肠病中的微生物组:从发病机制到治疗。
Protein Cell. 2021 May;12(5):331-345. doi: 10.1007/s13238-020-00745-3. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
3
Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome-like symptoms using Rome IV criteria in patients with inactive inflammatory bowel disease and relation with quality of life.
采用罗马IV标准评估非活动性炎症性肠病患者中肠易激综合征样症状的患病率及其与生活质量的关系。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(19):e20067. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020067.
4
Fecal and Mucosal Microbiota Profiling in Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Inflammatory Bowel Disease.肠易激综合征和炎症性肠病中的粪便及黏膜微生物群分析
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jul 17;10:1655. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01655. eCollection 2019.
5
Gut Microbiota in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome-A Systematic Review.肠易激综合征患者的肠道微生物群:系统评价。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Jul;157(1):97-108. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.049. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
6
Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Like Symptoms in Ulcerative Colitis Patients in Clinical Remission: Association with Residual Colonic Inflammation.溃疡性结肠炎临床缓解患者的肠易激综合征样症状:与残留结肠炎症的关系。
Digestion. 2019;99(1):46-51. doi: 10.1159/000494412. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
7
Microbiota dysbiosis and barrier dysfunction in inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancers: exploring a common ground hypothesis.肠道微生物失调和炎症性肠病及结直肠癌的屏障功能障碍:探索一个共同的基础假说。
J Biomed Sci. 2018 Nov 9;25(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12929-018-0483-8.
8
The gut microbiome and irritable bowel syndrome.肠道微生物群与肠易激综合征
F1000Res. 2018 Jul 9;7. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.14592.1. eCollection 2018.
9
No Significant Association Between the Fecal Microbiome and the Presence of Irritable Bowel Syndrome-type Symptoms in Patients with Quiescent Inflammatory Bowel Disease.在炎症性肠病缓解期患者中,肠道微生物组与肠易激综合征样症状的存在之间无显著关联。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018 Jun 8;24(7):1597-1605. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy052.
10
The Importance of Detecting Irritable Bowel-like Symptoms in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.炎症性肠病患者中检测肠易激综合征样症状的重要性。
J Crohns Colitis. 2018 Mar 28;12(4):385-386. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy012.