• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新颖的方法,用于教育住院心血管疾病患者关于生活方式和行为改变。

A novel approach to educate hospitalized cardiovascular disease patients about lifestyle and behavior modifications.

机构信息

Faculty of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, 1411713116, Tehran, Iran.

Center of Excellence in Healthcare Systems Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, 1411713116, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 20;21(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01680-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-021-01680-x
PMID:34801019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8606092/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are always considered by healthcare specialists for different reasons, including extensive prevalence, increased costs, chronicity, and high risk of death. The control of CVDs is highly influenced by behavior and lifestyle and it seems necessary to train special abilities about lifestyle and behavior modification to improve self-care skills for patients, and their caregivers. As a result, the development of effective training systems should be considered by healthcare specialists.

METHODS

Hence, in this study, a framework for improving cardiovascular patients' education processes is presented. Initially, an existing training system for cardiovascular patients is reviewed. Using field observations and targeted interviews with hospital experts, all components of its educating processes are identified, and their process maps are drawn up. After that, challenges in the training system are extracted with the aid of in-depth semi-structured interviews with experts. Due to the importance and different influence of the identified challenges, they are prioritized using a Multiple Criteria Decision-making (MCDM) method, and then their root causes were investigated. Finally, a novel framework is proposed and evaluated with hospital experts' help to improve the main challenges.

RESULTS

The most important challenges included high nursing workload and shortage of time, lack of understanding of training concepts by patients, lack of attention to training, disruption of the training processes by the patients' caregivers, and patient's weakness in understanding the standard language. In identifying the root causes, learner, educator, and educational tools are the most effective in the training process; therefore, the improvement scenarios were designed accordingly in the proposed framework.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicated that presenting a framework with applying different quantitative and qualitative methods has great potential to improve the processes of patient education for chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease.

摘要

背景

心血管疾病(CVDs)一直是医疗保健专家关注的焦点,原因包括广泛的流行率、增加的成本、慢性和高死亡率。CVD 的控制受行为和生活方式的影响很大,似乎有必要培养关于生活方式和行为改变的特殊能力,以提高患者及其护理人员的自我护理技能。因此,医疗保健专家应该考虑开发有效的培训系统。

方法

因此,在本研究中,提出了一种改善心血管患者教育过程的框架。首先,回顾了现有的心血管患者培训系统。通过对医院专家进行现场观察和针对性访谈,确定了其教育过程的所有组成部分,并绘制了其流程图。然后,通过对专家进行深入的半结构化访谈,提取培训系统中的挑战。由于所确定的挑战的重要性和不同影响,使用多准则决策(MCDM)方法对其进行优先级排序,然后调查其根本原因。最后,提出了一个新的框架,并在医院专家的帮助下进行了评估,以改善主要挑战。

结果

最重要的挑战包括护理工作量大且时间短、患者对培训概念理解不足、对培训重视不够、患者护理人员干扰培训过程以及患者理解标准语言的能力较弱。在确定根本原因时,学习者、教育者和教育工具在培训过程中最有效;因此,在提出的框架中相应地设计了改进方案。

结论

我们的研究表明,应用不同的定量和定性方法提出框架具有很大的潜力,可以改善心血管等慢性病患者的教育过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc8/8606092/23f57e8e1638/12911_2021_1680_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc8/8606092/6298e10d532e/12911_2021_1680_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc8/8606092/9592fb4e386f/12911_2021_1680_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc8/8606092/5eac5ef12a25/12911_2021_1680_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc8/8606092/7d6ef76a438b/12911_2021_1680_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc8/8606092/23f57e8e1638/12911_2021_1680_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc8/8606092/6298e10d532e/12911_2021_1680_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc8/8606092/9592fb4e386f/12911_2021_1680_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc8/8606092/5eac5ef12a25/12911_2021_1680_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc8/8606092/7d6ef76a438b/12911_2021_1680_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc8/8606092/23f57e8e1638/12911_2021_1680_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A novel approach to educate hospitalized cardiovascular disease patients about lifestyle and behavior modifications.一种新颖的方法,用于教育住院心血管疾病患者关于生活方式和行为改变。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 20;21(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01680-x.
2
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
3
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Implementing the 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations on resident physician work hours, supervision, and safety.实施 2009 年美国医学研究所关于住院医师工作时间、监督和安全的建议。
Nat Sci Sleep. 2011 Jun 24;3:47-85. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S19649. Print 2011.
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
The potential of a self-assessment tool to identify healthcare professionals' strengths and areas in need of professional development to aid effective facilitation of group-based, person-centered diabetes education.自我评估工具在确定医疗保健专业人员的优势和需要专业发展的领域方面的潜力,以帮助有效地促进基于群体的、以患者为中心的糖尿病教育。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Sep 18;17(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1003-3.
8
Older patients' perspectives toward lifestyle-related secondary cardiovascular prevention after a hospital admission-a qualitative study.老年患者住院后对与生活方式相关的二级心血管预防的看法——一项定性研究。
Age Ageing. 2021 May 5;50(3):936-943. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa283.
9
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
10
A systematic review of patient reported factors associated with uptake and completion of cardiovascular lifestyle behaviour change.患者报告的与心血管生活方式行为改变的接受和完成相关的因素的系统评价。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2012 Dec 8;12:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-12-120.

引用本文的文献

1
The quality of long-term counselling for percutaneous coronary intervention patients: A cross-sectional study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者长期咨询的质量:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Open. 2023 Aug;10(8):5541-5549. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1793. Epub 2023 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study.全球心血管疾病负担及危险因素, 1990-2019:来自 GBD 2019 研究的更新。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 22;76(25):2982-3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010.
2
The Tehran Heart Center.德黑兰心脏中心
Eur Heart J. 2018 Aug 1;39(29):2695-2696. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy369.
3
Self-Care for the Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association.
《心血管疾病和卒中的预防与管理中的自我保健:美国心脏协会医疗保健专业人员科学声明》。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug 31;6(9):e006997. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006997.
4
Registered Nurses' Patient Education in Everyday Primary Care Practice: Managers' Discourses.注册护士在日常基层医疗实践中的患者教育:管理者的话语
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2015 Aug 16;2:2333393615599168. doi: 10.1177/2333393615599168. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.
5
Socioeconomic status and risk factors for cardiovascular disease: Impact of dietary mediators.社会经济地位与心血管疾病风险因素:饮食调节因子的影响
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2017 Jan-Feb;58(1):32-42. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2017.01.022. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
6
Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation?成员核对:一种增强可信度的工具还是仅仅是对验证的认可?
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1802-1811. doi: 10.1177/1049732316654870. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
7
Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation.定性研究方法——访谈与观察。
J Basic Clin Pharm. 2014 Sep;5(4):87-8. doi: 10.4103/0976-0105.141942.
8
The importance of interactions between patients and healthcare professionals for heart failure self-care: A systematic review of qualitative research into patient perspectives.患者与医护人员之间的互动对心力衰竭自我护理的重要性:对患者观点的定性研究的系统评价
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015 Dec;14(6):525-35. doi: 10.1177/1474515114547648. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
9
What have our patients learnt after being hospitalised for an acute myocardial infarction?我们的患者在因急性心肌梗死住院后学到了什么?
Aust Crit Care. 2015 Aug;28(3):134-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
10
A history of patient education by health professionals in Europe and North America: from authority to shared decision making education.欧洲和北美的卫生专业人员对患者进行健康教育的历史:从权威到共同决策教育。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Mar;78(3):275-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.015. Epub 2010 Mar 1.