Suppr超能文献

报告健康研究指南中的性别考虑因素:系统评价。

Sex and gender considerations in reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review.

机构信息

Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Biol Sex Differ. 2021 Nov 20;12(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13293-021-00404-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite growing recognition of the importance of sex and gender considerations in health research, they are rarely integrated into research design and reporting. We sought to assess the integration of sex, as a biological attribute, and gender, as a socially constructed identity, in published reporting guidelines.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of published reporting guidelines listed on the EQUATOR website ( www.equator-nework.org ) from inception until December 2018. We selected all reporting guidelines (original and extensions) listed in the EQUATOR library. We used EndNote Citation Software to build a database of the statements of each guideline identified as a "full bibliographic reference" and retrieved the full texts. Reviewers independently extracted the data on use of sex and gender terms from the checklist/abstract/main text of guidelines. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

A total of 407 reporting guidelines were included; they were published between 1995 and 2018. Of the 407 guidelines, 235 (57.7%) mentioned at least one of the sex- and gender-related words. In the checklist of the reporting guidelines (n = 363), "sex" and "gender" were mentioned in 50 (13.8%) and 40 (11%), respectively. Only one reporting guideline met our criteria (nonbinary, appropriate categorization, and non-interchangeability) for correct use of sex and gender concepts. Trends in the use of "sex" and "gender" in the checklists showed that the use of "sex" only started in 2003, while "gender" has been in use since 1996.

CONCLUSIONS

We assessed the integration of sex and gender in reporting guidelines based on the use of sex- and gender-related words. Our findings showed a low use and integration of sex and gender concepts and their incorrect use. Authors of reporting guidelines should reduce this gap for a better use of research knowledge. Trial registration PROSPERO no. CRD42019136491.

摘要

背景

尽管人们越来越认识到在健康研究中考虑性别因素的重要性,但这些因素很少被纳入研究设计和报告中。我们旨在评估已发表的报告指南中纳入生物学属性的性别和社会构建身份的性别。

方法

我们对 EQUATOR 网站(www.equator-network.org)上列出的已发表的报告指南进行了系统评价,时间从成立到 2018 年 12 月。我们选择了 EQUATOR 库中列出的所有报告指南(原始和扩展)。我们使用 EndNote 引文软件建立了一个指南的所有陈述的数据库,这些陈述被确定为“完整的书目参考”,并检索了全文。评审员独立从指南的检查表/摘要/正文提取关于使用性别术语的信息。使用描述性统计和叙述性综合对数据进行分析。

结果

共纳入 407 项报告指南;它们发表于 1995 年至 2018 年之间。在 407 项指南中,有 235 项(57.7%)至少提到了一个与性别相关的词语。在报告指南的检查表中(n=363),分别有 50 项(13.8%)和 40 项(11%)提到了“性别”和“性别”。只有一项报告指南符合我们的标准(非二进制、适当分类和不可互换),正确使用了性别概念。检查表中“性别”和“性别”的使用趋势表明,“性别”仅在 2003 年开始使用,而“性别”自 1996 年以来一直在使用。

结论

我们根据使用与性别相关的词语来评估报告指南中性别纳入情况。我们的研究结果表明,性别概念的使用和整合程度较低,且使用不正确。报告指南的作者应缩小这一差距,以便更好地利用研究知识。试验注册 PROSPERO 编号 CRD42019136491。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c97/8605583/6eebcbb73a31/13293_2021_404_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验