Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Bld. 16, DK-1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, 1265 Welch Rd, Stanford, CA, 94305-5411, USA.
Biol Sex Differ. 2021 Feb 22;12(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13293-021-00366-3.
In this paper, we argue for Gender as a Sociocultural Variable (GASV) as a complement to Sex as a Biological Variable (SABV). Sex (biology) and gender (sociocultural behaviors and attitudes) interact to influence health and disease processes across the lifespan-which is currently playing out in the COVID-19 pandemic. This study develops a gender assessment tool-the Stanford Gender-Related Variables for Health Research-for use in clinical and population research, including large-scale health surveys involving diverse Western populations. While analyzing sex as a biological variable is widely mandated, gender as a sociocultural variable is not, largely because the field lacks quantitative tools for analyzing the influence of gender on health outcomes.
We conducted a comprehensive review of English-language measures of gender from 1975 to 2015 to identify variables across three domains: gender norms, gender-related traits, and gender relations. This yielded 11 variables tested with 44 items in three US cross-sectional survey populations: two internet-based (N = 2051; N = 2135) and a patient-research registry (N = 489), conducted between May 2017 and January 2018.
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses reduced 11 constructs to 7 gender-related variables: caregiver strain, work strain, independence, risk-taking, emotional intelligence, social support, and discrimination. Regression analyses, adjusted for age, ethnicity, income, education, sex assigned at birth, and self-reported gender identity, identified associations between these gender-related variables and self-rated general health, physical and mental health, and health-risk behaviors.
Our new instrument represents an important step toward developing more comprehensive and precise survey-based measures of gender in relation to health. Our questionnaire is designed to shed light on how specific gender-related behaviors and attitudes contribute to health and disease processes, irrespective of-or in addition to-biological sex and self-reported gender identity. Use of these gender-related variables in experimental studies, such as clinical trials, may also help us understand if gender factors play an important role as treatment-effect modifiers and would thus need to be further considered in treatment decision-making.
在本文中,我们主张将性别作为社会文化变量(GASV)补充到性别作为生物学变量(SABV)。性别(生物学)和性别(社会文化行为和态度)相互作用,影响整个生命周期的健康和疾病过程-这在 COVID-19 大流行中正在发生。本研究开发了一种性别评估工具-斯坦福性别相关变量健康研究工具-用于临床和人群研究,包括涉及不同西方人群的大规模健康调查。虽然分析生物学性别是广泛要求的,但社会文化性别并不是,主要是因为该领域缺乏分析性别对健康结果影响的定量工具。
我们对 1975 年至 2015 年期间的英语性别测量进行了全面审查,以确定三个领域的变量:性别规范、性别相关特征和性别关系。这产生了 11 个变量,在三个美国横断面调查人群中进行了 44 项测试:两个基于互联网的(N = 2051;N = 2135)和一个患者研究登记处(N = 489),分别在 2017 年 5 月至 2018 年 1 月之间进行。
探索性和验证性因子分析将 11 个结构简化为 7 个与性别相关的变量:照顾者压力、工作压力、独立性、冒险、情商、社会支持和歧视。回归分析,调整了年龄、种族、收入、教育、出生时分配的性别和自我报告的性别认同,确定了这些与性别相关的变量与自我报告的一般健康、身心健康和健康风险行为之间的关联。
我们的新工具代表了朝着开发更全面和精确的与健康相关的基于调查的性别测量迈出的重要一步。我们的问卷旨在阐明特定的性别相关行为和态度如何导致健康和疾病过程,而不论生物学性别和自我报告的性别认同如何-或者除了生物学性别和自我报告的性别认同之外。在实验研究中(例如临床试验)使用这些与性别相关的变量也可以帮助我们了解性别因素是否作为治疗效果修饰剂发挥重要作用,因此需要在治疗决策中进一步考虑。