Suppr超能文献

20 个欧洲国家老年人健康的社会保护支出:投入更多以减少健康不平等。

Social protection expenditure on health in later life in 20 European countries: Spending more to reduce health inequalities.

机构信息

LIVES Centre, Swiss Centre of Expertise in Life Course Research, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.

LIVES Centre, Swiss Centre of Expertise in Life Course Research, University of Geneva, Switzerland; Center for the Interdisciplinary Study of Gerontology and Vulnerability, University of Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114569. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114569. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to examine whether higher social protection expenditure reduces the negative association of life-course socioeconomic disadvantages with subjective and objective health status and trajectories in later life.

METHODS

We used SHARE data from participants living in 20 European countries aged 50 to 96. Seven waves allowed to examine the trajectories of health inequalities in later life. We used linear mixed-effects models stratified by sex to examine the association between life-course socioeconomic disadvantage and subjective (self-rated health, SRH, N = 55,443) and objective (grip strength, N = 54,718) health. Cross-level interactions between net social protection expenditure as percentage of gross domestic product and life-course socioeconomic disadvantage tested for the moderating effect of social expenditures on the association of disadvantage with SRH and grip strength in later life.

FINDINGS

Higher social protection expenditure reduced socioeconomic health inequalities in both men and women for grip strength, and in women but not men for SRH. For SRH, the health-inequality-reducing effect of social protection expenditure became weaker with increasing age. This was not observed in grip strength. Some separate expenditure functions (disability, family and children) were found to have inequality-widening effects in men's and women's SRH, which were either offset or overcompensated by the other functions. No inequality-widening effects were observed in grip strength.

INTERPRETATION

Higher social spending reduces life-course socioeconomic inequalities in women's subjective health and in men's and women's objective health. However, some specific social protection policies may have the unintentional effect of increasing inequalities in people's evaluation of their own health.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨较高的社会保护支出是否能降低生命历程中社会经济劣势对主观和客观健康状况及晚年轨迹的负面影响。

方法

我们使用了来自 20 个欧洲国家 50 至 96 岁参与者的 SHARE 数据。七次随访允许我们检验晚年健康不平等的轨迹。我们使用按性别分层的线性混合效应模型来检验生命历程中社会经济劣势与主观(自评健康,SRH,N=55443)和客观(握力,N=54718)健康之间的关联。净社会保护支出占国内生产总值的百分比与生命历程中社会经济劣势之间的交叉水平交互作用检验了社会支出对劣势与晚年 SRH 和握力之间关联的调节作用。

结果

较高的社会保护支出减少了男性和女性在握力方面的社会经济健康不平等,在女性而非男性的自评健康方面也减少了不平等。对于自评健康,社会保护支出对健康不平等的降低作用随着年龄的增长而减弱。在握力方面没有观察到这种情况。发现一些单独的支出功能(残疾、家庭和儿童)对男性和女性的自评健康有扩大不平等的影响,这些功能要么被其他功能抵消,要么被其他功能过度补偿。在握力方面没有观察到不平等扩大的影响。

结论

较高的社会支出减少了女性主观健康以及男性和女性客观健康方面的生命历程中社会经济劣势的不平等。然而,一些特定的社会保护政策可能会产生意想不到的效果,即增加人们对自己健康状况评价的不平等。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验