• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)治疗直肠癌后吻合口漏和慢性直肠前窦:与腹腔镜 TME 的对比研究。

Anastomotic leakage and chronic presacral sinus after transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: A comparative study to laparoscopic TME.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Asian J Surg. 2022 Nov;45(11):2197-2202. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.11.009
PMID:34801358
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown that there are no significant differences in anastomotic leakage associated with Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) versus laparoscopic TME (lapTME) for rectal cancer; however, little is known about late anastomotic leakage, such as that primarily found in the chronic presacral sinus. We aimed to compare the occurrence of anastomotic leakage and chronic presacral sinus in rectal cancer for taTME and lapTME.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, data were collected for patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgery between January 2009 and September 2019. Of the 220 patients included in this study, 182 were in the lapTME group and 38 in the taTME group. We compared factors associated with anastomotic leakage and chronic presacral sinus formation between the two groups. A binary-logistic model was used to determine the risk factors for chronic presacral sinus.

RESULTS

Anastomotic leakage occurred in six patients (15.8%) in the taTME group and 36 patients (19.7%) in the lapTME group. Chronic presacral sinus occurred in three patients (7.9%) in the taTME group and 15 patients (8.2%) in the lapTME group. There was no significant difference in anastomotic leakage or chronic presacral sinus between groups (P = 0.569 and P = 1.000, respectively). Pathologic stage III or higher was significantly associated with chronic presacral sinus formation (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences between taTME and lapTME regarding the incidence of anastomotic leakage or chronic presacral sinus. Almost one-third of anastomotic leakages developed into chronic presacral sinus.

摘要

背景

多项研究表明,经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)与腹腔镜直肠系膜切除术(lapTME)治疗直肠癌的吻合口漏发生率无显著差异;然而,对于吻合口漏的迟发情况,如主要发生在慢性骶前窦中的情况,了解甚少。我们旨在比较 taTME 和 lapTME 治疗直肠癌时吻合口漏和慢性骶前窦的发生情况。

方法

本回顾性队列研究收集了 2009 年 1 月至 2019 年 9 月期间接受手术治疗的直肠癌患者的数据。本研究共纳入 220 例患者,其中 182 例患者接受 lapTME 治疗,38 例患者接受 taTME 治疗。我们比较了两组患者吻合口漏和慢性骶前窦形成的相关因素。采用二项逻辑回归模型确定慢性骶前窦形成的危险因素。

结果

taTME 组中有 6 例(15.8%)患者发生吻合口漏,lapTME 组中有 36 例(19.7%)患者发生吻合口漏,两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.569)。taTME 组中有 3 例(7.9%)患者发生慢性骶前窦,lapTME 组中有 15 例(8.2%)患者发生慢性骶前窦,两组间差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。病理分期 III 期及以上与慢性骶前窦形成显著相关(P=0.006)。

结论

taTME 和 lapTME 治疗直肠癌的吻合口漏和慢性骶前窦发生率无显著差异。约三分之一的吻合口漏发展为慢性骶前窦。

相似文献

1
Anastomotic leakage and chronic presacral sinus after transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: A comparative study to laparoscopic TME.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)治疗直肠癌后吻合口漏和慢性直肠前窦:与腹腔镜 TME 的对比研究。
Asian J Surg. 2022 Nov;45(11):2197-2202. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
2
Outcomes of open vs laparoscopic vs robotic vs transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis.直肠癌开放手术、腹腔镜手术、机器人手术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TME)的疗效:一项网状Meta分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 May;27(5):345-360. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02739-1. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
3
[Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的安全性及预后分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 25;25(6):522-530. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210811-00321.
4
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for the treatment of mid and low rectal cancer: A meta-analysis.经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期临床疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;42(12):1841-1850. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
5
Three-Year Nationwide Experience with Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer in the Netherlands: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision.荷兰经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的三年全国经验:与传统腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术的倾向评分匹配比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Mar;228(3):235-244.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.016. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
6
Incidence and Risk Factors of Surgical Complications and Anastomotic Leakage After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌术后手术并发症及吻合口漏的发生率及危险因素。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Feb;27(2):373-381. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05546-z. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
7
Residual mesorectum on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging following transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LapTME) in rectal cancer.直肠癌经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)和腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术(LapTME)后术后磁共振成像的残留系膜。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):94-102. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6279-9. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
8
Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)与 MRI 定义低位直肠癌的腹腔镜 TME 比较:基于倾向评分匹配的肿瘤学结局分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2459-2467. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6530-4. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
9
Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: A Comparative Prospective Clinical Trial from Two Centers.经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术:来自两个中心的比较性前瞻性临床试验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Jul;30(7):769-776. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0828. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
10
Transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a comparative study of long-term oncological outcomes.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术:长期肿瘤学结果的比较研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Apr;26(4):279-290. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02570-8. Epub 2022 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
IRIS U kit usefulness in transanal total mesorectal excision for lower rectal cancer to avoid urethral injury.IRIS U 套件在低位直肠癌经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)中避免尿道损伤的作用。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Jun 17;24(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03279-8.
2
Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision versus transanal total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的系统评价和Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jan 26;103(4):e36859. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036859.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision versus transanal total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
微创全直肠系膜切除术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的系统评价和Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Jun 12;13:1167200. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1167200. eCollection 2023.