Jafri S Hammad, Imran Tasnim F, Medbury Elizabeth, Ursillo Jeannie, Ahmad Khansa, Imran Hafiz, Drwal Kariann, Wu Wen-Chih
Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Miriam Hospital Cardiac Rehabilitation Center, Providence, RI; Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI.
Heart Lung. 2022 Mar-Apr;52:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
Home Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (HBCR) has been considered a reasonable alternative to Center-based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CBCR) in patients with established cardiovascular disease, especially in the midst of COVID-19 pandemic. However, the long-term cardiovascular outcomes of patients referred to HBCR remains unknown.
To compare outcomes of patients who were referred and attended HBCR vs patients referred but did not attend HBCR (Non-HBCR).
We performed a retrospective study of 269 patients referred to HBCR at Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center (PVAMC). From November 2017 to March 2020, 427 patients were eligible and referred for Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) at PVAMC. Of total patients, 158 patients were referred to CBCR and 269 patients to HBCR based on patient and/or clinician preference. The analysis of outcomes was focused on HBCR patients. We compared outcomes of patients who were referred and attended HBCR vs patients referred but did not attend HBCR (Non-HBCR) from 3 to 12 months of the referral date. HBCR consisted of face-to-face entry exam with exercise prescription, weekly phone calls for education and exercise monitoring, with adjustments where applicable, for 12-weeks and an exit exam. Primary outcome was composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalizations. Secondary outcomes were all-cause hospitalization, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations, separately. We used cox proportional methods to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI. We adjusted for imbalanced characteristics at baseline: smoking, left ventricular ejection fraction and CABG status.
A total of 269 patients (mean age: 72, 98% Male) were referred to HBCR, however, only 157 (58%) patients attended HBCR. The primary outcome occurred in 30 patients (19.1%) in the HBCR group and 30 patients (30%) in the Non-HBCR group (adjusted HR=0.56, CI 0.33-0.95, P=.03). All-cause mortality occurred in 6.4% of patients in the HBCR group and 13% patients in the Non-HBCR group 3 to 12 months after HBCR referral (adjusted HR=0.43, CI 0.18-1.0, P= .05). There was no difference in cardiovascular hospitalizations (HBCR: 5.7% vs Non-HBCR: 10%, adjusted HR 0.57, CI 0.22-1.4, P= .23) or all cause hospitalizations at 3 to 12 months between the groups (HBCR: 12.7% vs Non-HBCR: 21%, adjusted HR 0.53, CI 0.28-1.01, P= .05).
Completion of HBCR among referred patients was associated with a lower risk of the combined all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalizations up to 12 months. Based on the outcomes, HBCR is a reasonable option that can improve access to CR for patients who are not candidates of or cannot attend CBCR. Randomized-controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.
对于已确诊心血管疾病的患者,尤其是在新冠疫情期间,居家心脏康复(HBCR)被认为是基于中心的心脏康复(CBCR)的合理替代方案。然而,转介至HBCR的患者的长期心血管结局仍不明确。
比较被转介并参加HBCR的患者与被转介但未参加HBCR(非HBCR)的患者的结局。
我们对普罗维登斯退伍军人事务医疗中心(PVAMC)269例被转介至HBCR的患者进行了回顾性研究。2017年11月至2020年3月,427例患者符合条件并被转介至PVAMC进行心脏康复(CR)。在所有患者中,根据患者和/或临床医生的偏好,158例患者被转介至CBCR,269例患者被转介至HBCR。结局分析主要针对HBCR患者。我们比较了从转介日期起3至12个月内被转介并参加HBCR的患者与被转介但未参加HBCR(非HBCR)的患者的结局。HBCR包括面对面的入院检查及运动处方、每周进行电话教育和运动监测,并在适当时进行调整,为期12周,以及出院检查。主要结局是全因死亡率和住院治疗的综合情况。次要结局分别是全因住院、全因死亡率和心血管住院。我们使用Cox比例法计算风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。我们对基线时不均衡的特征进行了调整:吸烟、左心室射血分数和冠状动脉搭桥术状态。
共有269例患者(平均年龄:72岁,98%为男性)被转介至HBCR,但只有157例(58%)患者参加了HBCR。HBCR组30例患者(19.1%)发生了主要结局,非HBCR组30例患者(30%)发生了主要结局(调整后HR = 0.56,CI 0.33 - 0.95,P = 0.03)。在HBCR转介后3至12个月,HBCR组6.4%的患者发生了全因死亡,非HBCR组13%的患者发生了全因死亡(调整后HR = 0.43,CI 0.18 - 1.0,P = 0.05)。两组之间在3至12个月时的心血管住院情况(HBCR:5.7% vs非HBCR:10%,调整后HR 0.57,CI 0.22 - 1.4,P = 0.23)或全因住院情况(HBCR:12.7% vs非HBCR:21%,调整后HR 0.53,CI 0.28 - 1.01,P = 0.05)没有差异。
被转介患者完成HBCR与长达12个月的全因死亡率和全因住院综合风险较低相关。基于这些结局,HBCR是一个合理的选择,对于那些不适合或无法参加CBCR的患者,可以改善其获得CR的机会。需要进行随机对照研究来证实这些发现。