J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021;32(4):2125-2142. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2021.0186.
Research summary. Extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs) allow police, family, and household members to file an order to temporarily remove firearms or prevent purchasing among individuals at high risk for harming themselves or others. Using inductive qualitative content analysis, we examined 241 ERPOs filed December 8, 2016 through May 10, 2019 in Washington State. Focusing on recurring themes, we explored the circumstances and behaviors that led to an ERPO filing. Extreme risk protection orders were filed over concerns for domestic violence, mass shooting threats, direct threats to oneself or others, and other concerning behavior with a firearm. Factors at all levels of the social-ecological model were found to play a role in the dangerous behaviors of respondents that led to an ERPO petition. Policy implications. Extreme risk protection orders can serve an important role in both protecting people and facilitating the provision of care for substance use, mental illness, and assistance to vulnerable individuals.
研究总结。极端风险保护令 (ERPO) 允许警察、家人和家庭成员提出申请,以暂时没收高风险自残或伤害他人个人的枪支或阻止其购买枪支。我们采用归纳定性内容分析法,研究了 2016 年 12 月 8 日至 2019 年 5 月 10 日期间在华盛顿州提交的 241 份 ERPO。我们专注于反复出现的主题,探讨了导致 ERPO 申请的情况和行为。ERPO 是因家庭暴力、大规模枪击威胁、直接威胁自己或他人以及其他与枪支有关的令人担忧的行为而提出的。社会生态模型各个层面的因素都被发现与导致 ERPO 申请的被申请人的危险行为有关。政策意义。极端风险保护令在保护个人和为药物使用、精神疾病以及为弱势群体提供帮助方面都可以发挥重要作用。