Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Prevention and Policy, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 13;17(9):e0274489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274489. eCollection 2022.
Firearm-related injuries remain a heavy public health and clinical burden in the United States. Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) laws, which create a path through a civil court process to temporarily remove firearms from individuals deemed to be at risk of harming themselves or others and are one strategy designed to reduce firearm violence. Maryland was the first state to authorize clinicians as ERPO petitioners.
We aim to document a sample of Maryland physicians' perspectives about the utility of, any barriers to, and other thoughts on clinicians as ERPO petitioners.
A series of semi-structured interviews with Maryland physicians identified through a combination of purposive and snowball sampling. We coded the transcribed interviews and analyzed the coded transcripts for themes using deductive content analysis.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: 13 Maryland-based physicians interviewed over Zoom in and around Baltimore City, Maryland.
The interviewees had overall positive feedback about ERPO as a gun violence prevention tool in the clinical setting. They identified several barriers to effective implementation such as time spent on paperwork and in court, a lack of awareness among clinicians about ERPO, threats to therapeutic alliance, and a sense of futility in a culture where firearms are easy to obtain. Solutions such as providing clinician education about ERPO laws, allowing for virtual court testimony, and creating a consult service with ERPO specialists to manage ERPO petitions were discussed.
This study includes a small sample of Maryland-based physicians.
The physicians we interviewed expressed interest in knowing more about ERPO laws and emphasized education as an important tool for improving implementation. Addressing physicians' concerns about ERPO implementation will improve their ability to be effective and efficient petitioners.
在美国,与枪支相关的伤害仍然是一个严重的公共卫生和临床负担。极端风险保护令 (ERPO) 法律规定了一个通过民事诉讼程序的途径,可以暂时将枪支从被认为有自残或伤害他人风险的个人手中移除,这是旨在减少枪支暴力的策略之一。马里兰州是第一个授权临床医生作为 ERPO 申请人的州。
我们旨在记录马里兰州医生对临床医生作为 ERPO 申请人的效用、任何障碍以及其他想法的看法。
通过有目的和滚雪球抽样相结合的方法,对马里兰州的医生进行了一系列半结构化访谈。我们对转录的访谈进行了编码,并使用演绎内容分析对编码的访谈记录进行了主题分析。
地点/参与者:在马里兰州巴尔的摩市及周边地区,通过有目的和滚雪球抽样相结合的方法,确定了 13 名马里兰州的医生进行了 Zoom 访谈。
受访者对 ERPO 作为临床环境中预防枪支暴力的工具总体上持积极反馈。他们确定了一些有效实施的障碍,例如在文书工作和法庭上花费的时间、临床医生对 ERPO 的认识不足、对治疗联盟的威胁,以及在枪支容易获得的文化中感到无能为力。讨论了一些解决方案,例如为临床医生提供有关 ERPO 法律的教育、允许虚拟法庭证词以及创建一个由 ERPO 专家管理 ERPO 申请的咨询服务。
本研究仅包括马里兰州的一小部分医生。
我们采访的医生对了解更多有关 ERPO 法律的信息表示了兴趣,并强调教育是提高实施效果的重要工具。解决医生对 ERPO 实施的担忧将提高他们作为有效和高效申请人的能力。