Suppr超能文献

平衡预测与意外:主动睡眠在意识起源中发挥作用?

Balancing Prediction and Surprise: A Role for Active Sleep at the Dawn of Consciousness?

作者信息

Van De Poll Matthew N, van Swinderen Bruno

机构信息

Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Front Syst Neurosci. 2021 Nov 5;15:768762. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.768762. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The brain is a prediction machine. Yet the world is never entirely predictable, for any animal. Unexpected events are surprising, and this typically evokes prediction error signatures in mammalian brains. In humans such mismatched expectations are often associated with an emotional response as well, and emotional dysregulation can lead to cognitive disorders such as depression or schizophrenia. Emotional responses are understood to be important for memory consolidation, suggesting that positive or negative 'valence' cues more generally constitute an ancient mechanism designed to potently refine and generalize internal models of the world and thereby minimize prediction errors. On the other hand, abolishing error detection and surprise entirely (as could happen by generalization or habituation) is probably maladaptive, as this might undermine the very mechanism that brains use to become better prediction machines. This paradoxical view of brain function as an ongoing balance between prediction and surprise suggests a compelling approach to study and understand the evolution of consciousness in animals. In particular, this view may provide insight into the function and evolution of 'active' sleep. Here, we propose that active sleep - when animals are behaviorally asleep but their brain seems awake - is widespread beyond mammals and birds, and may have evolved as a mechanism for optimizing predictive processing in motile creatures confronted with constantly changing environments. To explore our hypothesis, we progress from humans to invertebrates, investigating how a potential role for rapid eye movement (REM) sleep in emotional regulation in humans could be re-examined as a conserved sleep function that co-evolved alongside selective attention to maintain an adaptive balance between prediction and surprise. This view of active sleep has some interesting implications for the evolution of subjective awareness and consciousness in animals.

摘要

大脑是一台预测机器。然而,对于任何动物来说,世界都并非完全可预测。意外事件令人惊讶,这通常会在哺乳动物的大脑中引发预测误差信号。在人类中,这种不匹配的期望往往还与情绪反应相关联,而情绪调节障碍可能导致诸如抑郁症或精神分裂症等认知障碍。情绪反应被认为对记忆巩固很重要,这表明积极或消极的“效价”线索更普遍地构成了一种古老的机制,旨在有力地完善和概括世界的内部模型,从而将预测误差降至最低。另一方面,完全消除错误检测和惊讶感(如通过泛化或习惯化可能发生的那样)可能是适应不良的,因为这可能会破坏大脑用于成为更好预测机器的机制。这种将大脑功能视为预测与惊讶之间持续平衡的矛盾观点,为研究和理解动物意识的进化提供了一种引人注目的方法。特别是,这种观点可能有助于深入了解“主动”睡眠的功能和进化。在这里,我们提出主动睡眠——当动物在行为上处于睡眠状态但其大脑似乎清醒时——在哺乳动物和鸟类之外广泛存在,并且可能已经进化为一种机制,用于优化处于不断变化环境中的活动生物的预测处理。为了探索我们的假设,我们从人类研究到无脊椎动物,研究快速眼动(REM)睡眠在人类情绪调节中的潜在作用如何能够作为一种与选择性注意共同进化以维持预测与惊讶之间适应性平衡的保守睡眠功能而被重新审视。这种主动睡眠的观点对动物主观意识和意识的进化有一些有趣的启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83da/8602873/2df0191e43d4/fnsys-15-768762-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验