Putman Esther J, Galvan-Garza Raquel C, Clark Torin K
Ann and H.J. Smead Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States.
Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories, Arlington, VA, United States.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Nov 3;15:756674. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.756674. eCollection 2021.
Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) is a non-invasive method of electrically stimulating the vestibular system. We investigated whether the application of GVS can alter the learning of new functional mobility and manual control tasks and whether learning can be retained following GVS application. In a between-subjects experiment design, 36 healthy subjects performed repeated trials, capturing the learning of either (a) a functional mobility task, navigating an obstacle course on a compliant surface with degraded visual cues or (b) a manual control task, using a joystick to null self-roll tilt against a pseudo-random disturbance while seated in the dark. In the "learning" phase of trials, bilateral, bipolar GVS was applied continuously. The GVS waveform also differed between subjects in each task group: (1) white noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) at 0.3 mA (2) high-level random GVS at 0.7 mA (selected from pilot testing as destabilizing, but not painful), or (3) with the absence of stimulation (i.e., sham). Following the "learning" trials, all subjects were blindly transitioned to sham GVS, upon which they immediately completed another series of trials to assess any aftereffects. In the functional mobility task, we found nGVS significantly improved task learning ( = 0.03, mean learning metric 171% more than the sham group). Further, improvements in learning the functional mobility task with nGVS were retained, even once the GVS application was stopped. The benefits in learning with nGVS were not observed in the manual control task. High level GVS tended to inhibit learning in both tasks, but not significantly so. Even once the high-level stimulation was stopped, the impaired performance remained. Improvements in learning with nGVS may be due to increased information throughput resulting from stochastic resonance. The benefit of nGVS for functional mobility, but not manual control nulling, may be due to the multisensory (e.g., visual and proprioceptive), strategic, motor coordination, or spatial awareness aspects of the former task. Learning improvements with nGVS have the potential to benefit individuals who perform functional mobility tasks, such as astronauts, firefighters, high performance athletes, and soldiers.
直流电前庭刺激(GVS)是一种电刺激前庭系统的非侵入性方法。我们研究了GVS的应用是否能改变新的功能性移动和手动控制任务的学习,以及在应用GVS后学习是否能得以保留。在一项受试者间实验设计中,36名健康受试者进行了重复试验,学习以下任务之一:(a)功能性移动任务,即在视觉线索退化的情况下在顺应性表面上通过障碍课程;或(b)手动控制任务,即在黑暗中就座时使用操纵杆抵消伪随机干扰引起的自身滚动倾斜。在试验的“学习”阶段,持续施加双侧双极GVS。每个任务组中受试者的GVS波形也有所不同:(1)0.3毫安的白噪声直流电前庭刺激(nGVS);(2)0.7毫安的高强度随机GVS(从预试验中选择,因其具有去稳定作用但不引起疼痛);或(3)无刺激(即假刺激)。在“学习”试验之后,所有受试者都被盲目转换为假GVS,随后他们立即完成另一系列试验以评估任何后效应。在功能性移动任务中,我们发现nGVS显著改善了任务学习( = 0.03,平均学习指标比假刺激组多171%)。此外,即使停止应用GVS,使用nGVS学习功能性移动任务的改善效果仍然得以保留。在手动控制任务中未观察到nGVS对学习的益处。高强度GVS在两项任务中都倾向于抑制学习,但效果不显著。即使停止高强度刺激,受损的表现仍然存在。nGVS对学习的改善可能是由于随机共振导致信息吞吐量增加。nGVS对功能性移动有益,但对手动控制抵消无益,这可能是由于前一项任务的多感官(如视觉和本体感觉)、策略性、运动协调或空间意识方面的原因。nGVS对学习的改善有可能使执行功能性移动任务的个体受益,如宇航员、消防员、高水平运动员和士兵。