Liu Peibing, Zhang Xin, Zhou Renlai
Department of Psychology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Smart Home Solution BU of Innovation Business Group, TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd., Huizhou, China.
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 4;12:712309. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712309. eCollection 2021.
Whether working memory training is effective in enhancing fluid intelligence remains in dispute. Several researchers, who doubt the training benefits, consider that placebo effects may be the reason for positive training gains. One of the vital variables that may induce the placebo effect is the mindset of intelligence. In this article, we provide a test of whether the mindset of intelligence leads to placebo effects in working memory training. Participants were overtly recruited and allocated to the growth mindset group or the fixed mindset group by Theories of Intelligence Scale scores. A single, 1 h session working memory training is the cue to introduce the placebo effects. During pre/post-testing, all participants completed tasks measuring working memory capacity (near transfer) and fluid intelligence (far transfer). Our findings show no significant difference between the two groups in both tasks. Therefore, these results suggest that the placebo effect does not exist in this study, which means individuals' mindset of intelligence may not be a contributor to the placebo effect in 1 h working memory training. This research will further help to clarify the mechanism of the placebo effect in working memory training.
工作记忆训练在提高流体智力方面是否有效仍存在争议。一些怀疑训练益处的研究人员认为,安慰剂效应可能是训练取得积极效果的原因。可能诱发安慰剂效应的关键变量之一是智力心态。在本文中,我们检验了智力心态是否会在工作记忆训练中导致安慰剂效应。通过智力理论量表得分公开招募参与者,并将其分配到成长心态组或固定心态组。单次1小时的工作记忆训练是引入安慰剂效应的线索。在测试前/后,所有参与者都完成了测量工作记忆容量(近迁移)和流体智力(远迁移)的任务。我们的研究结果表明,两组在这两项任务中均无显著差异。因此,这些结果表明本研究中不存在安慰剂效应,这意味着个体的智力心态可能不是1小时工作记忆训练中安慰剂效应的促成因素。这项研究将进一步有助于阐明工作记忆训练中安慰剂效应的机制。