Mullins Elise K, Powers Thomas W, Zobel Jim, Clawson Kory M, Barnes Lauren F, Draper Benjamin E, Zou Qin, Binder Joseph J, Dai Stanley, Zhang Kun, Friese Olga, Runnels Herbert A, Jarrold Martin F, Thompson Lawrence C
Analytical Research and Development, Biotherapeutic Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pfizer Inc., Chesterfield, MO, United States.
Chemistry Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Nov 4;9:753480. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.753480. eCollection 2021.
We observed differential infectivity and product yield between two recombinant chimpanzee adenovirus C68 constructs whose primary difference was genome length. To determine a possible reason for this outcome, we characterized the proportion and composition of the empty and packaged capsids. Both analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) and differential centrifugation sedimentation (DCS, a rapid and quantitative method for measuring adenoviral packaging variants) were employed for an initial assessment of genome packaging and showed multiple species whose abundance deviated between the virus builds but not manufacturing campaigns. Identity of the packaging variants was confirmed by charge detection mass spectrometry (CDMS), the first known application of this technique to analyze adenovirus. The empty and packaged capsid populations were separated via preparative ultracentrifugation and then combined into a series of mixtures. These mixtures showed the oft-utilized denaturing A260 adenoviral particle titer method will underestimate the actual particle titer by as much as three-fold depending on the empty/full ratio. In contrast, liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection proves to be a superior viral particle titer methodology.
我们观察到两种重组黑猩猩腺病毒C68构建体之间存在感染性差异和产物产量差异,其主要区别在于基因组长度。为了确定这一结果的可能原因,我们对空衣壳和包装衣壳的比例及组成进行了表征。分析超速离心(AUC)和差速离心沉降(DCS,一种用于测量腺病毒包装变体的快速定量方法)均用于基因组包装的初步评估,结果显示存在多个种类,其丰度在不同病毒构建体之间存在差异,但在不同生产批次之间无差异。通过电荷检测质谱(CDMS)确认了包装变体的身份,这是该技术首次用于分析腺病毒。通过制备性超速离心分离空衣壳和包装衣壳群体,然后将它们混合成一系列混合物。这些混合物表明,常用的变性A260腺病毒颗粒滴定法会根据空/满比例将实际颗粒滴度低估多达三倍。相比之下,荧光检测液相色谱法被证明是一种更优越的病毒颗粒滴定方法。