Nobrega Diego, Andres-Lasheras Sara, Zaheer Rahat, McAllister Tim, Homerosky Elizabeth, Anholt R Michele, Dorin Craig
Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Nov 2;8:764701. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.764701. eCollection 2021.
Here, we investigated the prevalence and risk factors for the presence of , and in the respiratory tract of calves from the spring processing to the reprocessing at feedlots. Additionally, we characterized, phenotypically and genotypically, the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profile of the four species. Calves from 22 cow-calf operations were enrolled in the study ( = 30 calves per operation) and sampled by deep nasopharyngeal swabs at three time points: spring processing, weaning, or induction into feedlots, and at reprocessing at the feedlot. Isolates were tested for susceptibility using the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test against commonly administered antimicrobials. Additionally, a subset of isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing to infer presence of AMR genes and resistance determinants. Among studied pathogens, was the most prevalent species, regardless of time point, followed by , and . For , a sharp increase in prevalence was detected at the reprocessing sampling, whereas for , an increase in prevalence was observed at the weaning/induction sampling. Comingling and co-location of feedlots were not associated with prevalence of any respiratory pathogen. In terms of AMR, resistance against macrolides was prevalent in , with most isolates resistant against tildipirosin, tilmicosin, and tylosin. In general, there was limited evidence to support an increase in resistance rates of respiratory bacteria from the spring processing to reprocessing at feedlots, with the exception of florfenicol resistance in , which increased at reprocessing. Metaphylactic administration of tetracyclines at feedlot induction was not associated with the MIC of tetracyclines in any respiratory bacteria. Conversely, there were clear associations between the parenteral use of macrolides as metaphylaxis at the feedlot induction, and increased MIC against macrolides in , and . Overall, the AMR phenotypes were corroborated by presence of AMR genes. We hypothesize that the administration of macrolides such as tulathromycin at feedlot induction contributes to historical changes in macrolides MIC data of respiratory bacteria of beef cattle.
在此,我们调查了从春季处理到饲养场再处理阶段犊牛呼吸道中[具体物种名称1]、[具体物种名称2]和[具体物种名称3]的流行情况及风险因素。此外,我们从表型和基因型方面对这四个物种的抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)特征进行了描述。来自22个母牛 - 犊牛养殖场的犊牛参与了本研究(每个养殖场30头犊牛),并在三个时间点通过深鼻咽拭子采样:春季处理时、断奶时或进入饲养场时,以及在饲养场再处理时。使用最低抑菌浓度(MIC)试验对分离株进行常用抗菌药物的敏感性测试。此外,对一部分分离株进行全基因组测序以推断AMR基因和耐药决定因素的存在情况。在所研究的病原体中,无论时间点如何,[具体物种名称1]是最普遍的物种,其次是[具体物种名称2]和[具体物种名称3]。对于[具体物种名称1],在再处理采样时检测到患病率急剧上升,而对于[具体物种名称2],在断奶/进入饲养场采样时观察到患病率增加。饲养场的混群和共处与任何呼吸道病原体的患病率均无关联。在AMR方面,[具体物种名称1]对大环内酯类药物的耐药性普遍存在,大多数分离株对替地珠单抗、替米考星和泰乐菌素耐药。总体而言,除了[具体物种名称3]在再处理时氟苯尼考耐药性增加外,从春季处理到饲养场再处理阶段,呼吸道细菌耐药率增加的证据有限。在饲养场引入时预防性使用四环素与任何呼吸道细菌中四环素的MIC无关。相反,在饲养场引入时作为预防性用药胃肠外使用大环内酯类药物与[具体物种名称1]和[具体物种名称2]中对大环内酯类药物MIC增加之间存在明显关联。总体而言,AMR基因的存在证实了AMR表型。我们推测在饲养场引入时使用诸如图拉霉素等大环内酯类药物促成了肉牛呼吸道细菌大环内酯类药物MIC数据的历史性变化。