Oftalvis Clinic, Alicante, Spain.
Optics and Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021 Dec;18(12):1219-1234. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2021.2008908. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
To analyze the agreement of the predicted intraocular lens (IOL) power obtained with ANTERION, IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL biometers.
We calculated the monofocal and trifocal IOL power using the SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II and Hoffer Q formulas for 106 eyes. IOL power agreement between devices was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method.
We found significant differences between biometers comparisons ( < 0.001). ANTERION and IOLMaster 700 did not produce significant IOL power differences ( > 0.05), with the same outcomes for medium- and long-eyes. No significant differences were found using the SRK/T, Haigis, or Hoffer Q formulas for short-eyes ( > 0.1). However, Barrett Universal II formula produced significant differences ( < 0.05) and these differences lay between the ANTERION and Pentacam AXL. ANTERION versus IOLMaster 700 comparison showed limits of agreement (LoA) varying from 1.1071D in SRK/T monofocal medium-eyes to 1.6828D in Hoffer Q trifocal all-eyes. The largest LoA (about 3.0D) was found for short-eyes when comparing the Pentacam AXL with the other two devices.
These devices provided statistically significant but clinically insignificant mean differences in predicted IOL power. However, wide LoA values suggest that for specific eyes these outcomes could be clinically significant.
分析使用 ANTERION、IOLMaster 700 和 Pentacam AXL 生物测量仪预测的人工晶状体(IOL)度数的一致性。
我们使用 SRK/T、Haigis、Barrett Universal II 和 Hoffer Q 公式计算了 106 只眼的单焦点和三焦点 IOL 度数。使用 Bland-Altman 方法评估设备之间的 IOL 度数一致性。
我们发现生物测量仪之间的比较存在显著差异(<0.001)。ANTERION 和 IOLMaster 700 之间没有产生显著的 IOL 度数差异(>0.05),对于中眼和长眼也是如此。对于短眼,SRK/T、Haigis 或 Hoffer Q 公式没有发现显著差异(>0.1)。然而,Barrett Universal II 公式产生了显著差异(<0.05),这些差异介于 ANTERION 和 Pentacam AXL 之间。ANTERION 与 IOLMaster 700 的比较显示,一致性界限(LoA)从 SRK/T 单焦点中眼的 1.1071D 到 Hoffer Q 三焦点全眼的 1.6828D 不等。当将 Pentacam AXL 与其他两种设备进行比较时,短眼的 LoA 最大(约 3.0D)。
这些设备在预测 IOL 度数方面提供了统计学上显著但临床上无显著差异的平均值。然而,宽的 LoA 值表明对于特定的眼睛,这些结果可能在临床上具有重要意义。