• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[不同剂量糖皮质激素对2型糖尿病疼痛患者微创治疗的影响]

[Effects of different doses of glucocorticoids on minimally invasive procedures in pain patients with type 2 diabetes].

作者信息

Qing A L, Lei X H, Chen L, Sun F G, Weng Y, Li C Y, Ye L, Wen C B

机构信息

Department of Pain Medicine,West China Hospital, Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041, China.

West China School of Public Health, Department of Anesthesiology, West China Fourth Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Nov 23;101(43):3554-3558. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210726-01663.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210726-01663
PMID:34808747
Abstract

To investigate the effects of different doses of glucocorticoids on minimally invasive procedures in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and optimize the clinical pathways of minimally invasive procedures. The clinical data of 284 patients with T2DM who received minially invasive procedures from the Department of Pain Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University from May 2017 to May 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the main diagnostic types: spine-related group (=148) and herpes zoster group (=136). According to the cumulative dose of glucocorticoids (GCs) per unit body surface area during the hospitalization, patients were further divided into three subgroups: low-dose group (GCs<3.5 mg/m), medium-dose group (3.5 mg/m ≤GCs<7 mg/m), and high-dose group (GCs≥7 mg/m). The clinical characteristics of the patients in different subgroups of the two diseases groups were compared. The effects of the glucocorticoids on the pain intensity, blood glucose, length of hospital stay (LOS) and total hospitalization cost were compared among the 3 subgroups of the two diseases groups. There were no significant differences in the age, gender, height, weight, visual analog scale (VAS) and fasting blood glucose before procedures between the two groups (all >0.05). The VAS score of the low-dose group from the spine-related group was 4.5±1.6, which was higher than that of the medium-dose group (3.5±1.3) (=0.004). VAS score was 4.3±1.3 in the medium-dose group and 4.4±1.6 in the high-dose group from the herpes zoster group, which were higher than that in the low-dose group (3.5±0.9) (=0.006). In terms of blood glucose, the impact on the fasting blood glucose before and after the procedures in the low-dose group from the spine-related group was less than that in the medium dose group (=0.013). In the herpes zoster group, the blood glucose of the low-dose group was (11±5) mmol/L, which had less influence on the blood glucose fluctuation during the hospitalization than that in the high-dose group [(15±5) mmol/L] (<0.05). The LOS and hospitalization cost in the low-dose group from the spine-related group were (9±4) d and (10 583±4 851) yuan, respectively, which were less than those in the medium-dose group [(11±3) d and (15 202±7 418) yuan] and high-dose group [(13±6) d and (18 100±4 138) yuan] (all <0.05); however, there was no significant difference among different subgroups in the herpes zoster group (all >0.05). When used in the patients with T2DM undergoing minimally invasive procedures for spine-related diseases, low-dose glucocorticoids can obtain more clinical benefit than high dose, and high dose can lead to raised blood glucose, prolong the LOS, and increase the hospitalization cost.

摘要

探讨不同剂量糖皮质激素对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者微创手术的影响,优化微创手术临床路径。回顾性分析2017年5月至2020年5月四川大学华西医院疼痛科收治的284例行微创手术的T2DM患者的临床资料。根据主要诊断类型将患者分为两组:脊柱相关组(n = 148)和带状疱疹组(n = 136)。根据住院期间单位体表面积糖皮质激素(GCs)的累积剂量,将患者进一步分为三个亚组:低剂量组(GCs<3.5 mg/m²)、中剂量组(3.5 mg/m²≤GCs<7 mg/m²)和高剂量组(GCs≥7 mg/m²)。比较两组不同亚组患者的临床特征。比较两组疾病三个亚组中糖皮质激素对疼痛强度、血糖、住院时间(LOS)和总住院费用的影响。两组患者术前年龄、性别、身高、体重、视觉模拟评分(VAS)和空腹血糖比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。脊柱相关组低剂量组VAS评分为4.5±1.6,高于中剂量组(3.5±1.3)(P = 0.004)。带状疱疹组中剂量组VAS评分为4.3±1.3,高剂量组为4.4±1.6,均高于低剂量组(3.5±0.9)(P = 0.006)。血糖方面,脊柱相关组低剂量组对手术前后空腹血糖的影响小于中剂量组(P = 0.013)。带状疱疹组中,低剂量组血糖为(11±5)mmol/L,对住院期间血糖波动的影响小于高剂量组[(15±5)mmol/L](P<0.05)。脊柱相关组低剂量组LOS和住院费用分别为(9±4)d和(10 583±4 851)元,均低于中剂量组[(11±3)d和(15 202±7 418)元]及高剂量组[(13±6)d和(18 100±4 138)元](均P<0.05);而带状疱疹组不同亚组间差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。对于行脊柱相关疾病微创手术的T2DM患者,低剂量糖皮质激素比高剂量能获得更多临床益处,高剂量会导致血糖升高、延长LOS并增加住院费用。

相似文献

1
[Effects of different doses of glucocorticoids on minimally invasive procedures in pain patients with type 2 diabetes].[不同剂量糖皮质激素对2型糖尿病疼痛患者微创治疗的影响]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Nov 23;101(43):3554-3558. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210726-01663.
2
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗肥胖患者的临床疗效比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jun;20(6):644-52. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.SPINE13794. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
3
[Effectiveness of simultaneous and staged minimally invasive dorsal decompression-stabilization procedures in patients with lumbar spine degenerative diseases].[同期与分期微创腰椎减压融合术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的疗效比较]
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2021;85(1):36-46. doi: 10.17116/neiro20218501136.
4
SuperPATH Minimally Invasive Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly: Preliminary Clinical Results.SuperPATH 微创入路治疗老年股骨颈骨折全髋关节置换术:初步临床结果。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Feb;12(1):74-85. doi: 10.1111/os.12584. Epub 2019 Dec 29.
5
Comparison of minimally invasive surgery with standard open surgery for vertebral thoracic metastases causing acute myelopathy in patients with short- or mid-term life expectancy: surgical technique and early clinical results.预期寿命短或中期的患者因胸椎转移瘤导致急性脊髓病时,微创手术与标准开放手术的比较:手术技术及早期临床结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 May;22(5):518-25. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE131201. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
6
Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎管狭窄症的心理和功能比较。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Jun;13(4):1213-1226. doi: 10.1111/os.12986. Epub 2021 May 4.
7
A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.一项比较单节段微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的围手术期成本分析。
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.053. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
8
Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.I度退行性腰椎滑脱症的微创与开放融合手术:质量结果数据库分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E11. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17188.
9
A Novel Inextensible Endoscopic Tube Versus Traditional Extensible Retractor System in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Observation Study.新型不可伸缩内镜管与传统可伸缩牵开器系统在单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术中的应用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Pain Physician. 2019 Nov;22(6):E587-E599.
10
Cost minimization in treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.成人退变性脊柱侧凸治疗中的成本最小化
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Dec;23(6):798-806. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.SPINE14560. Epub 2015 Aug 28.