Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, 20, Boramae-ro 5-gil, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 07061, Republic of Korea.
BMC Cancer. 2021 Nov 22;21(1):1260. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08940-z.
To determine whether additional chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) improves survival outcomes in patients with early cervical cancer who undergo radical hysterectomy (RH).
We included high- or intermediate-risk patients from two institutions, with 2009 FIGO stage IB-IIA, who underwent primary RH and pelvic lymphadenectomy between January 2007 and June 2020, and had completed adjuvant CCRT. Survival outcomes were compared between patients who received additional chemotherapy (study group) and those who did not (control group).
A total of 198 patients were included in this analysis. The study (n = 61) and control groups (n = 137) had similar patient age, histologic cancer type, 2009 FIGO stage, and tumor size. However, minimally invasive surgery was performed less frequently in the study group than in the control group (19.7% vs. 46.0%, P < 0.001). The presence of pathologic risk factors was similar, except for lymph node metastasis, which was more frequent in the study group (72.1% vs. 46.0%; P = 0.001). In survival analyses, no differences in the disease-free survival (DFS; P = 0.539) and overall survival (OS; P = 0.121) were observed between the groups. Multivariate analyses adjusting for surgical approach and other factors revealed that additional chemotherapy was not associated with DFS (adjusted HR, 1.149; 95% CI, 0.552-2.391; P = 0.710) and OS (adjusted HR, 1.877; 95% CI, 0.621-5.673; P = 0.264). The recurrence patterns did not differ with additional chemotherapy. Consistent results were observed in a subset of high-risk patients (n = 139).
Additional chemotherapy after CCRT might not improve survival outcomes in patients with early cervical cancer who undergo RH.
为了确定在接受根治性子宫切除术(RH)的早期宫颈癌患者中,同步放化疗(CCRT)后是否增加化疗是否能改善生存结局。
我们纳入了来自两个机构的高风险或中风险患者,2009 年FIGO 分期为 IB-IIA 期,于 2007 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月期间接受了原发性 RH 和盆腔淋巴结切除术,并完成了辅助 CCRT。比较接受额外化疗(研究组)和未接受化疗(对照组)的患者的生存结局。
共有 198 名患者纳入本分析。研究组(n=61)和对照组(n=137)的患者年龄、组织学癌症类型、2009 年FIGO 分期和肿瘤大小相似。然而,研究组接受微创外科手术的比例明显低于对照组(19.7% vs. 46.0%,P<0.001)。除了淋巴结转移(72.1% vs. 46.0%;P=0.001)更常见外,两组的病理危险因素相似。在生存分析中,两组无疾病无进展生存期(DFS;P=0.539)和总生存期(OS;P=0.121)差异无统计学意义。多变量分析调整手术方式和其他因素后发现,额外化疗与 DFS 无关(调整 HR,1.149;95%CI,0.552-2.391;P=0.710)和 OS(调整 HR,1.877;95%CI,0.621-5.673;P=0.264)。附加化疗的复发模式没有差异。在高危患者亚组(n=139)中观察到了一致的结果。
在接受 RH 的早期宫颈癌患者中,CCRT 后增加化疗可能不会改善生存结局。