• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与育儿项目的促进因素和障碍:一项定性系统评价

Facilitators and barriers to engagement in parenting programs: a qualitative systematic review.

作者信息

Mytton Julie, Ingram Jenny, Manns Sarah, Thomas James

机构信息

1University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Health Educ Behav. 2014 Apr;41(2):127-37. doi: 10.1177/1090198113485755. Epub 2013 May 2.

DOI:10.1177/1090198113485755
PMID:23640123
Abstract

Parenting programs have the potential to improve the health and well-being of parents and children. A challenge for providers is to recruit and retain parents in programs. Studies researching engagement with programs have largely focused on providers', policy makers', or researchers' reflections of their experience of parents' participation. We conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies where parents had been asked why they did or did not choose to commence, or complete programs, and compared these perceptions with those of researchers and those delivering programs. We used data-mining techniques to identify relevant studies and summarized findings using framework synthesis methods. Six facilitator and five barrier themes were identified as important influences on participation, with a total of 33 subthemes. Participants focused on the opportunity to learn new skills, working with trusted people, in a setting that was convenient in time and place. Researchers and deliverers focused on tailoring the program to individuals and on the training of staff. Participants and researchers/deliverers therefore differ in their opinions of the most important features of programs that act as facilitators and barriers to engagement and retention. Program developers need to seek the views of both participants and deliverers when evaluating programs.

摘要

育儿项目有潜力改善父母和孩子的健康与幸福。对项目提供者来说,一个挑战是招募并留住参与项目的父母。研究项目参与情况的研究主要集中在提供者、政策制定者或研究人员对父母参与经历的反思上。我们对定性研究进行了系统综述,这些研究询问了父母为什么选择或不选择开始或完成项目,并将这些看法与研究人员和项目实施者的看法进行了比较。我们使用数据挖掘技术来识别相关研究,并使用框架综合方法总结研究结果。确定了六个促进因素主题和五个障碍主题,它们是参与的重要影响因素,共有33个子主题。参与者关注学习新技能的机会、与值得信赖的人合作,以及时间和地点便利的环境。研究人员和实施者则关注根据个人情况调整项目以及员工培训。因此,参与者与研究人员/实施者对项目中作为参与和留存促进因素及障碍的最重要特征的看法存在差异。项目开发者在评估项目时需要征求参与者和实施者双方的意见。

相似文献

1
Facilitators and barriers to engagement in parenting programs: a qualitative systematic review.参与育儿项目的促进因素和障碍:一项定性系统评价
Health Educ Behav. 2014 Apr;41(2):127-37. doi: 10.1177/1090198113485755. Epub 2013 May 2.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Effectiveness and experiences of families and support workers participating in peer-led parenting support programs delivered as home visiting programs: a comprehensive systematic review.家庭和支持工作者参与以同伴为主导的育儿支持项目(作为家访项目开展)的有效性和经验:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Oct;14(10):167-208. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003166.
5
Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability.针对智障父母的家长培训干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 13;7(7):CD007987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007987.pub3.
6
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
7
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
8
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.实施非专业卫生工作者项目以改善孕产妇和儿童健康服务可及性的障碍与促进因素:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;2013(10):CD010414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2.
9
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
10
Parent training interventions for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years.针对5至18岁儿童注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的家长培训干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD003018. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003018.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Momentary assessment of parent and child emotion regulation to inform the design of a new emotion-focused parenting app.对父母和孩子情绪调节的即时评估,为一款新的聚焦情绪的育儿应用程序的设计提供信息。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 3;20(7):e0327179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327179. eCollection 2025.
2
A mobile-based, single-session intervention to empower parents of adolescents hospitalised for non-suicidal self-injury: A mixed-methods randomised controlled trial.一项基于手机的单阶段干预措施,旨在增强因非自杀性自伤而住院青少年的父母的能力:一项混合方法随机对照试验。
Internet Interv. 2025 Mar 29;40:100822. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100822. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
The effect and cost-effectiveness of a group-based parenting intervention for parents of preschool children with subclinical neurodevelopmental disorders and mental health problems: protocol for a multiple-baseline single-case experimental design (SCED) with a pre-, post and follow-up.
一项针对有亚临床神经发育障碍和心理健康问题的学龄前儿童家长的团体养育干预措施的效果及成本效益:一项采用前测、后测和随访的多基线单病例实验设计(SCED)方案
BMC Psychol. 2025 Mar 27;13(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02618-y.
4
Family-based sexual health interventions for adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: systematic analysis and meta-analysis.低收入和中等收入国家针对青少年的家庭性健康干预措施:系统分析与荟萃分析
Int Health. 2025 Sep 3;17(5):617-648. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaf017.
5
Tuning in to Kids Together: Piloting an Emotion-Focused Coparenting Program.共同关注孩子:试行一项以情感为重点的共同养育计划。
Fam Process. 2025 Mar;64(1):e70002. doi: 10.1111/famp.70002.
6
Enhancing engagement in parenting programs: A comparative study of in-person, online, and telehealth formats.提高参与育儿项目的程度:面对面、在线和远程医疗形式的比较研究。
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2024 Jul;162. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107686. Epub 2024 May 24.
7
The Mellow Babies parenting programme: role of group processes and interpersonal change mechanisms.“圆润宝贝”育儿项目:群体过程和人际变化机制的作用
Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 17;3:1395363. doi: 10.3389/frcha.2024.1395363. eCollection 2024.
8
The importance of group factors in the delivery of group-based parenting programmes: a process evaluation of Mellow Babies.群体因素在基于群体的育儿项目实施中的重要性:“温柔宝贝”项目的过程评估
Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 6;3:1395365. doi: 10.3389/frcha.2024.1395365. eCollection 2024.
9
Indigenous Parents' Perspectives of Factors That Facilitate or Impede Engagement in Internet-Based Parenting Support Programs: Interpretive Description Study.原住民父母对促进或阻碍参与基于互联网的育儿支持项目的因素的看法:诠释性描述研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024 Nov 22;7:e64994. doi: 10.2196/64994.
10
Implementing an early-life nutrition intervention through primary healthcare: staff perspectives.通过基层医疗实施婴幼儿营养干预:工作人员观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 20;24(1):1106. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11582-z.