Department of Psychology, "Niccolò Cusano" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
School of Health Sciences, Division of Health Services Research and Management, City University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Psychol Health. 2023 Jul-Aug;38(8):1056-1073. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2021.2001469. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
This study aimed to identify clusters of participants with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) at risk for developing psychological and somatic distress symptoms. Moreover, we investigated whether the different clusters were associated with glycemic control, sleep, and physical activity levels.. In a cross-sectional design, participants with T2DM ( = 269) completed questionnaires on psychological and somatic distress, sleep disorders and physical activity.
Cluster analyses yielded three groups: a) "high self-confident and low demoralised"; b) "low support and low involvement"; c) "high consequences, high demoralisation and nagging". The groups were distinguished by the social, cognitive, and vital exhaustion variables and significant differences in diabetes-related psychological distress and physical activity. The measure of glycemic control did not differ between clusters. The "high self-confident and low demoralised" group displayed the lowest scores on psychological distress compared to the other clusters.
Results suggest that social cognitive dimensions and affective states play a key role in defining clusters in participants with T2DM. Thus, we need to consider the psychological profiles of participants with T2DM when designing interventions to improve self-management strategies.
本研究旨在确定 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者出现心理和躯体困扰症状风险的人群聚类。此外,我们还调查了不同聚类是否与血糖控制、睡眠和身体活动水平有关。采用横断面设计,269 例 T2DM 患者完成了关于心理和躯体困扰、睡眠障碍和身体活动的问卷。
聚类分析产生了三个组:a)“高自信低沮丧”;b)“低支持低参与”;c)“高后果、高沮丧和唠叨”。这些组在社会、认知和疲惫变量上有所不同,与糖尿病相关的心理困扰和身体活动也存在显著差异。血糖控制的衡量指标在聚类之间没有差异。与其他聚类相比,“高自信低沮丧”组在心理困扰方面的得分最低。
结果表明,社会认知维度和情感状态在确定 T2DM 患者的聚类方面起着关键作用。因此,在设计改善自我管理策略的干预措施时,我们需要考虑 T2DM 患者的心理特征。