Köhler Gernot, Kaltenböck Richard, Fehrer Hans-Jörg, Függer Reinhold, Gangl Odo
Abteilung für Allgemein und Viszeralchirurgie, Klinikum Rohrbach, Krankenhausstraße 1, 4150, Rohrbach, Österreich.
Universitätsklinik für Chirurgie, Paracelsus Medizinische Universität Salzburg, Salzburg, Österreich.
Chirurg. 2022 Apr;93(4):373-380. doi: 10.1007/s00104-021-01537-z. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
Lateral abdominal wall hernias are rare and inconsistently defined, which is why the use of the European Hernia Society classification makes sense, not least for the purpose of comparing the quality of surgical results. A distinction must be made between true fascial defects and denervation atrophy. Based on the available literature, there is generally a low level of evidence with no consensus on the best operative strategy. The proximity to bony structures and the complex anatomy of the three-layer abdominal wall make the technical treatment of lateral hernias difficult. The surgical variations include laparoendoscopic, robotic, minimally invasive, open or hybrid approaches with different mesh positions in relation to the layers of the abdominal wall. The extensive preperitoneal mesh reinforcement open, transabdominal peritoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic repair or total extraperitoneal (TEP) endoscopic repair has met with the greatest approval. The extent of the required medial mesh overlap is determined by the distance between the medial defect boundary and the lateral edge of the straight rectus abdominus muscles. The medially directed preperitoneal and retroperitoneal dissection can be extended into the homolateral retrorectus compartment by laterally incising the posterior rectus sheath or by crossing the midline behind the intact linea alba into the contralateral retrorectus compartment. The intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) technique is a suitable procedure only for smaller defects with possible defect closure but it is also important as an exit strategy in the case of a defective peritoneum. Individualized prehabilitative and preconditioning measures are just as important as the assessment of preoperative anamnestic and clinical findings and risks with radiographic cross-sectional imaging diagnostics.
侧腹壁疝较为罕见且定义不统一,这就是为何采用欧洲疝学会的分类是合理的,尤其是为了比较手术结果的质量。必须区分真正的筋膜缺损和去神经萎缩。根据现有文献,总体证据水平较低,对于最佳手术策略尚无共识。靠近骨性结构以及三层腹壁的复杂解剖结构使得侧疝的技术治疗具有难度。手术方式包括腹腔镜内镜、机器人辅助、微创、开放或混合入路,且补片相对于腹壁各层的位置不同。广泛的腹膜前补片加强开放手术、经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹腔镜修补术或完全腹膜外(TEP)内镜修补术获得了最大认可。所需内侧补片重叠的范围由内侧缺损边界与腹直肌外侧缘之间的距离决定。向内侧的腹膜前和腹膜后解剖可通过横向切开腹直肌后鞘或在完整的白线后方越过中线进入对侧腹直肌后间隙而延伸至同侧腹直肌后间隙。腹腔内置入补片(IPOM)技术仅适用于较小且可能闭合的缺损,但在腹膜有缺陷的情况下作为一种补救策略也很重要。个体化的康复前和预处理措施与术前病史及临床检查结果评估以及影像学横断面成像诊断的风险评估同样重要。