Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Division of Micro and Nanosystems, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Heart Vessels. 2022 Apr;37(4):697-704. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-01995-9. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
The objective of the study was to investigate the safety profile of high-risk micro-endomyocardial biopsy (micro-EMB) compared to conventional EMB in a large animal model. Twenty pigs were subjected to a maximum of 30 consecutive biopsies, including sampling from the free ventricular wall, with either micro-EMB (n = 10) or conventional EMB (n = 10). There were no major complications in the micro-EMB group (0/10), compared to six major complications in the EMB group (6/10; p = 0.003). Survival analysis further highlighted these differences (p = 0.004). There were significantly higher volumes of pericardial effusion in the EMB group (p = 0.01). The study shows a safety advantage of micro-EMB compared to standard EMB in the experimental high-risk circumstances investigated in this animal study. These results indicate enhanced possibilities to collect samples from sensitive areas by using the micro-EMB technique instead of standard EMB.
研究目的是在大型动物模型中研究高危微型心内膜心肌活检(micro-EMB)与常规 EMB 的安全性特征。20 只猪接受了最多 30 次连续活检,包括从游离心室壁取样,分别使用 micro-EMB(n=10)或常规 EMB(n=10)。micro-EMB 组无重大并发症(0/10),而 EMB 组有 6 个重大并发症(6/10;p=0.003)。生存分析进一步突出了这些差异(p=0.004)。EMB 组的心包积液量明显更高(p=0.01)。这项研究表明,在本动物研究中调查的实验性高危情况下,micro-EMB 比标准 EMB 具有安全性优势。这些结果表明,使用 micro-EMB 技术可以更安全地从敏感区域采集样本,而不是标准 EMB。