Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Apr;29(4):2231-2239. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11088-6. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
The COVID-19 pandemic caused delays in breast cancer management forcing clinicians to potentially alter treatment recommendations. This study compared breast cancer stage at diagnosis and rates of neoadjuvant therapy among women presenting to our institution before and during COVID-19.
Retrospective chart review of patients with a new breast cancer diagnosis from March 2020-August 2020 (during-COVID-19) were compared with March 2019-August 2019 (pre-COVID-19). We compared stage at diagnosis, clinical/demographic features, and neoadjuvant therapy use between the time periods.
A total of 573 patients included: 376 pre-COVID-19, 197 during-COVID-19. Method of cancer detection was by imaging in 66% versus 63% and by physical findings/symptoms in 34% versus 37% of patients comparing pre-COVID-19 to during-COVID-19, p = 0.47. Overall clinical prognostic stage did not differ significantly (p = 0.39) between the time periods, nor did cM1 disease (2% in each period); 23% pre-COVID-19 and 27% during-COVID-19 presented with cN+ disease (p = 0.38). Neoadjuvant therapy use was significantly higher during-COVID-19 (39%) versus pre-COVID-19 (29%, p = 0.02) driven by increased neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) use (7% to 16%, p = 0.002), whereas neoadjuvant chemotherapy use did not change (22% vs. 23%, p = 0.72). In HR+/HER2- disease, NET use increased from 10% pre-COVID-19 to 23% during-COVID-19 (p = 0.001) with a significant increase in stage I patients (7 to 22%, p < 0.001) and nonsignificant increases in stage II (18 to 23%, p = 0.63) and stage III (9 to 29%, p = 0.29).
Breast cancer stage at diagnosis did not differ significantly during-COVID-19 compared with pre-COVID-19. More patients during-COVID-19 were treated with NET, which was significantly increased in stage I HR+/HER2- disease.
COVID-19 大流行导致乳腺癌管理延迟,迫使临床医生可能改变治疗建议。本研究比较了我们机构在 COVID-19 期间和之前就诊的女性的乳腺癌诊断时分期和新辅助治疗率。
对 2020 年 3 月至 8 月期间(COVID-19 期间)和 2019 年 3 月至 8 月期间(COVID-19 之前)新诊断为乳腺癌的患者进行回顾性图表审查。我们比较了这两个时期的诊断时分期、临床/人口统计学特征和新辅助治疗的使用情况。
共纳入 573 例患者:COVID-19 前组 376 例,COVID-19 期间组 197 例。COVID-19 前组中通过影像学发现癌症的比例为 66%,而通过体检/症状发现癌症的比例为 34%;COVID-19 期间组中分别为 63%和 37%,两组相比差异无统计学意义(p=0.47)。两个时期的总体临床预后分期无显著差异(p=0.39),cM1 期疾病也无显著差异(各期均为 2%);COVID-19 前组和 COVID-19 期间组中分别有 23%和 27%的患者存在 cN+疾病(p=0.38)。COVID-19 期间组新辅助治疗使用率明显高于 COVID-19 前组(39% vs. 29%,p=0.02),主要是由于新辅助内分泌治疗(NET)使用率增加(7%至 16%,p=0.002),而新辅助化疗使用率没有变化(22% vs. 23%,p=0.72)。在 HR+/HER2- 疾病中,NET 使用率从 COVID-19 前组的 10%增加到 COVID-19 期间组的 23%(p=0.001),I 期患者的使用率显著增加(7 至 22%,p<0.001),而 II 期(18 至 23%,p=0.63)和 III 期(9 至 29%,p=0.29)的增加无统计学意义。
与 COVID-19 前相比,COVID-19 期间乳腺癌诊断时分期无显著差异。COVID-19 期间更多的患者接受了 NET 治疗,HR+/HER2- 疾病 I 期的 NET 治疗显著增加。