School of Communication, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Health Inspection Institute, Health Commission of Suzhou, Suzhou, China.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Oct 19;11(10):2166-2174. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.131. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in radical changes in many aspects of life. To deal with this, each country has implemented continuous health measures from the beginning of the outbreak. Discovering how governmental actions impacted public behaviour during the outbreak stage is the purpose of this study.
This study uses a hybrid large-scale data visualisation method to analyse public behaviour (epidemic concerns, self-protection, and mobility trends), using the data provided by multiple authorities. Meanwhile, a content analysis method is used to qualitatively code the health measures of three countries with severe early epidemic outbreaks from different continents, namely China, Italy, and the United States. Eight dimensions are coded to rate the mobility restrictions implemented in the above countries.
(1) Governmental measures did not immediately persuade the public to change their behaviours during the COVID-19 epidemic. Instead, the public behaviour proceeded in a three-phase rule, which is typically witnessed in an epidemic outbreak, namely the wait-and-see phase, the surge phase and the slow-release phase. (2) The strictness of the mobility restrictions of the three countries can be ranked as follows: Hubei Province in China (with an average score of 8.5 out of 10), Lombardy in Italy (7.125), and New York State in the United States (5.375). Strict mobility restrictions are more likely to cause a surge of population outflow from the epidemic area in the short term, whereas the effect of mobility restrictions is positively related to the stringency of policies in the long term.
The public showed generally lawful behaviour during regional epidemic outbreaks and blockades. Meanwhile public behaviour was deeply affected by the actions of local governments, rather than the global pandemic situation. The contextual differences between the various countries are important factors that influence the effects of the different governments' health measures.
2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行导致生活的许多方面发生了根本性变化。为了应对这种情况,每个国家从疫情开始就实施了持续的卫生措施。本研究旨在发现政府在疫情爆发阶段的行动如何影响公众行为。
本研究使用混合的大规模数据可视化方法来分析公众行为(疫情关注、自我保护和流动趋势),使用多个机构提供的数据。同时,使用内容分析法对来自不同大洲的三个疫情早期严重爆发的国家的卫生措施进行定性编码,即中国、意大利和美国。对以上国家实施的流动限制进行了八个维度的编码评分。
(1)政府措施并没有立即说服公众在 COVID-19 疫情期间改变行为。相反,公众行为按照通常在疫情爆发期间观察到的三阶段规则进行,即观望阶段、激增阶段和缓慢释放阶段。(2)三个国家的流动限制严格程度可排序如下:中国湖北省(平均得分为 8.5 分)、意大利伦巴第(7.125 分)和美国纽约州(5.375 分)。严格的流动限制更有可能在短期内导致疫情地区的人口外流激增,而流动限制的效果与政策的严格程度呈正相关。
在区域性疫情爆发和封锁期间,公众表现出普遍守法行为。同时,公众行为受到地方政府行动的深刻影响,而不是受全球大流行情况的影响。各国之间的背景差异是影响不同政府卫生措施效果的重要因素。