School of Public Health and Health Management, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, 341000, Jiangxi Province, China.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 6;22(1):1692. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14097-6.
The COVID-19 crisis poses considerable threats to public health, and exploring the key configuration conditions of the public behavior response is very important for emergency risk management.
This study attempts to reveal differences in the conditional configuration and mechanism of public behavior based on the proposed framework, further make up for the deficiencies of existing research in explaining such issues as "How to promote the public's protective behavior or reduce the public's excessive behavior?" and finally provide new evidence and ideas for the government to improve the emergency management system.
A total of 735 valid cases were obtained using an online survey and revealed the conditional configuration and mechanism of public behavior differences through a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis based on the proposed public behavioral framework.
The results show that critical factors including risk communication, trust, risk perception, and negative emotions alone did not constitute a necessary condition for public protective or excessive behavior. The different configurations of influencing factors reveal the complexity of public behavioral risk management, and taking adequate measures to increase public trust and reduce negative public emotions constitute the core path of risk management to enhance positive public behavior.
The configurations of various influencing factors reveal the complexity of public behavioral risk management. For behavioral risk management, governments should focus on adapting to multiple conditions according to their situations and, under the "overall perspective," formulate policies based on local conditions and further form a differentiated risk management path. Practically speaking, for the government, taking adequate measures to increase public trust and reduce negative public emotions is the core path of risk management to enhance positive public behavior.
新冠疫情危机对公共卫生构成了巨大威胁,探索公众行为反应的关键配置条件对于应急风险管理非常重要。
本研究试图基于提出的框架揭示公众行为的条件配置和机制差异,进一步弥补现有研究在解释“如何促进公众的保护行为或减少公众的过度行为?”等问题上的不足,为政府完善应急管理体系提供新的证据和思路。
通过在线调查共获得了 735 个有效案例,并通过基于提出的公众行为框架的模糊集定性比较分析揭示了公众行为差异的条件配置和机制。
结果表明,风险沟通、信任、风险感知和负面情绪等单一关键因素并不构成公众保护或过度行为的必要条件。影响因素的不同配置揭示了公众行为风险管理的复杂性,采取充分措施增加公众信任和减少负面公众情绪构成了增强积极公众行为的风险管理核心路径。
各种影响因素的配置揭示了公众行为风险管理的复杂性。对于行为风险管理,政府应根据自身情况适应多种条件,并在“整体视角”下制定因地制宜的政策,进一步形成差异化的风险管理路径。实际上,对于政府来说,采取充分措施增加公众信任和减少负面公众情绪是增强积极公众行为的风险管理核心路径。