Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Research Center in Back, Neck, Other Joint Pain and Human Performance (BNOJPH), Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Nov 23;22(1):976. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04854-w.
Several clinical tests used to identify patients with lumbar instability have reported diagnostic accuracy in separate studies with conflicting results. To augment the diagnostic process, tests that are better able to identify lumbar instability suitable for use in the clinical setting are required. The aim of this study was to identify the probability to diagnose patients with lumbar instability, using x-ray imaging as the reference standard.
This study was a cross-sectional, diagnostic validity study. One hundred forty participants with chronic low back pain underwent an x-ray assessment and 14 clinical examinations. Data were analysed using multivariate regression methods to determine which clinical tests were most diagnostic for lumbar instability when they were applied together.
Eighteen (12.85%) participants had radiological lumbar instability. Three clinical tests i) interspinous gap change during flexion-extension, ii) passive accessory intervertebral movement tests, iii) posterior shear test demonstrated an ability to diagnose lumbar instability of 67% when they were all positive. At this probability threshold, sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (+LR), and negative likelihood ratio (-LR) were 5.56, 99.18%, 6.78, and 0.95.
These 3 clinical tests could be useful in identifying patients with lumbar instability in the general community. These three tests are simple to perform by physical therapists, reliable to use in a clinical setting, and safe for patients. We recommend physical therapists use these three tests to assess patients who are suspected of having lumbar instability, in the absence of an x-ray assessment, to receive appropriate targeted intervention or referral for further investigation.
Thai Clinial Trial Registry (TCTR 20180820001; 19th August 2018).
有几项用于识别腰椎不稳定患者的临床测试在单独的研究中报告了不同的诊断准确性。为了增强诊断过程,需要能够更好地识别适合临床使用的腰椎不稳定的测试。本研究的目的是确定使用 X 射线成像作为参考标准来诊断腰椎不稳定患者的可能性。
本研究为横断面诊断有效性研究。140 名慢性腰痛患者接受了 X 射线评估和 14 项临床检查。使用多变量回归方法分析数据,以确定当这些临床检查一起应用时,哪些检查对腰椎不稳定最具诊断价值。
18 名(12.85%)参与者存在放射学腰椎不稳定。当 3 项临床检查 i)屈伸时棘突间隙变化、ii)被动辅助椎间运动测试、iii)后向剪切测试均为阳性时,对腰椎不稳定的诊断能力为 67%。在这个概率阈值下,敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比(+LR)和阴性似然比(-LR)分别为 5.56、99.18%、6.78 和 0.95。
这 3 项临床检查可用于识别一般人群中的腰椎不稳定患者。这些测试由物理治疗师执行简单,在临床环境中使用可靠,对患者安全。我们建议物理治疗师在没有 X 射线评估的情况下使用这 3 项检查来评估疑似腰椎不稳定的患者,以获得适当的针对性干预或转介进行进一步检查。
泰国临床试验注册中心(TCTR 20180820001;2018 年 8 月 19 日)。