• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床实践中最佳实践老年人髋部脆性骨折护理标准:倾向评分匹配分析。

Clinical practice of Best Practice Nursing Care Standards for Older Adults with Fragility Hip Fracture: A propensity score matched analysis.

机构信息

Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, General Hospital of Western Theater Command (Chengdu Military General Hospital), Chengdu, China.

Department of General Surgery, General Hospital of Western Theater Command (Chengdu Military General Hospital), Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Appl Nurs Res. 2021 Dec;62:151491. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151491. Epub 2021 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151491
PMID:34814995
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fragility hip fracture (FHF) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults. In 2018, Best Practice Nursing Care Standards for Older Adults with Fragility Hip Fracture (NSOF) were released by The International Collaboration of Orthopaedic Nursing (ICON). However, there are only limited clinical data about the application of this standard in clinical practice in China.

AIMS

To determine the clinical practice effect of the NSOF.

METHODS

A retrospective single-centre cohort study was performed from January 2016 to June 2020. Patients were divided into the standardized nursing care group (SN group) and the conventional nursing care group (CN group) depending on whether they were cared for according to the NSOF criteria. The propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was conducted in this study. The perioperative and follow-up outcomes between the two groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 204 patients diagnosed with FHF were included in the study. After a 1:1 matching, 56 cases were identified in the SN group as well as the CN group. Patients in the SN group had significantly shorter preoperative wait times for surgery (17.4 ± 4.6 vs. 24.4 ± 7.6 h, p < 0.05) and a higher proportion of individuals performing exercise within 24 h after surgery (94.6% vs. 66.1%, p < 0.05). Notably, patients in the SN group also had a significantly shorter length of stay than those in the CN group (9.4 ± 3.1 vs. 14.2 ± 5.1 days, p < 0.05). At the 6-month follow-up, the incidence of refracture was significantly lower (3.6% vs. 14.3%, p < 0.05), and the timed up and go mobility index was improved in the SN group compared to the CN group (20.3 ± 1.7 vs. 24.6 ± 2.2 s, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that application of the NSOF resulted in a significant improvement in the treatment of older adults patients with FHF.

摘要

背景

脆性髋部骨折(FHF)是老年人发病率和死亡率的重要原因。2018 年,国际骨科护理协作组织(ICON)发布了《老年脆性髋部骨折最佳护理实践标准》(NSOF)。然而,在中国,关于该标准在临床实践中应用的临床数据有限。

目的

确定 NSOF 的临床实践效果。

方法

这是一项回顾性单中心队列研究,于 2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月进行。根据是否按照 NSOF 标准进行护理,将患者分为标准化护理组(SN 组)和常规护理组(CN 组)。本研究采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析。分析两组患者的围手术期和随访结果。

结果

共有 204 例脆性髋部骨折患者纳入研究。经过 1:1 匹配,SN 组和 CN 组各有 56 例患者。SN 组患者的术前手术等待时间明显更短(17.4±4.6 比 24.4±7.6 小时,p<0.05),术后 24 小时内进行运动的比例更高(94.6%比 66.1%,p<0.05)。值得注意的是,SN 组患者的住院时间也明显短于 CN 组(9.4±3.1 比 14.2±5.1 天,p<0.05)。6 个月随访时,SN 组的再骨折发生率明显较低(3.6%比 14.3%,p<0.05),且计时起立行走移动指数优于 CN 组(20.3±1.7 比 24.6±2.2 秒,p<0.05)。

结论

本研究表明,应用 NSOF 可显著改善脆性髋部骨折老年患者的治疗效果。

相似文献

1
Clinical practice of Best Practice Nursing Care Standards for Older Adults with Fragility Hip Fracture: A propensity score matched analysis.临床实践中最佳实践老年人髋部脆性骨折护理标准:倾向评分匹配分析。
Appl Nurs Res. 2021 Dec;62:151491. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151491. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
2
Propensity score matching analysis of early vs. delayed surgery for intertrochanteric fracture in older patients: a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 7414 patients with a mean 4-year follow up.倾向评分匹配分析老年患者股骨转子间骨折的早期与延迟手术:一项回顾性多中心队列研究,随访平均 4 年,共纳入 7414 例患者。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 12;24(1):821. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05415-1.
3
Impact of preoperative echocardiography on surgical delays and outcomes among adults with hip fracture.术前超声心动图对髋部骨折成年患者手术延迟和结局的影响。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Feb;103-B(2):271-278. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-1011.R1.
4
Medical Comanagement of Hip Fracture Patients Is Not Associated with Superior Perioperative Outcomes: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project.髋关节骨折患者的医疗共管与围手术期结局的改善不相关:国家手术质量改进计划的倾向评分匹配回顾性队列分析。
J Hosp Med. 2020 Aug;15(8):468-474. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3343.
5
Health economic implications of perioperative delirium in older patients after surgery for a fragility hip fracture.老年患者髋部脆性骨折术后围手术期谵妄的健康经济影响
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 May 20;97(10):829-36. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00724.
6
How well are we managing fragility hip fractures? A narrative report on the review with the attempt to setup a Fragility Fracture Registry in Hong Kong.我们对髋部脆性骨折的管理情况如何?一份关于相关综述的叙述性报告以及在香港建立脆性骨折登记处的尝试。
Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Jun;23(3):264-71. doi: 10.12809/hkmj166124. Epub 2017 May 5.
7
Association between early postoperative nutritional supplement utilisation and length of stay in malnourished hip fracture patients.早期术后营养补充利用与营养不良性髋部骨折患者住院时间的关系。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;126(3):730-737. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.12.026. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
8
Association Between Wait Time and 30-Day Mortality in Adults Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery.髋部骨折手术成年患者等待时间与30天死亡率之间的关联
JAMA. 2017 Nov 28;318(20):1994-2003. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17606.
9
Association of Computer-Assisted Virtual Preoperative Planning With Postoperative Mortality and Complications in Older Patients With Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture.计算机辅助虚拟术前规划与老年股骨转子间骨折患者术后死亡率和并发症的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e205830. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5830.
10
Preoperative Echocardiography for Patients With Hip Fractures Undergoing Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Nationwide Database.接受手术治疗的髋部骨折患者的术前超声心动图:使用全国范围内数据库的回顾性队列研究。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Feb;128(2):213-220. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003888.

引用本文的文献

1
Which performance indicators are used globally for evaluating healthcare in patients with a hip fracture? : a mixed methods systematic review.全球用于评估髋部骨折患者医疗保健的绩效指标有哪些?:一项混合方法的系统评价。
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Mar 6;6(3):275-290. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0104.R1.