Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 23;11(1):22737. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02154-w.
This study provides a quantitative assessment of the accuracy of a commercially available deformable image registration (DIR) algorithm to automatically generate prostate contours and additionally investigates the robustness of radiomic features to differing contours. Twenty-eight prostate cancer patients enrolled on an institutional review board (IRB) approved protocol were selected. Planning CTs (pCTs) were deformably registered to daily cone-beam CTs (CBCTs) to generate prostate contours (auto contours). The prostate contours were also manually drawn by a physician. Quantitative assessment of deformed versus manually drawn prostate contours on daily CBCT images was performed using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean distance-to-agreement (MDA), difference in center-of-mass position (ΔCM) and difference in volume (ΔVol). Radiomic features from 6 classes were extracted from each contour. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and mean absolute percent difference in radiomic feature-derived data (mean |%Δ|RF) between auto and manual contours were calculated. The mean (± SD) DSC, MDA, ΔCM and ΔVol between the auto and manual prostate contours were 0.90 ± 0.04, 1.81 ± 0.47 mm, 2.17 ± 1.26 mm and 5.1 ± 4.1% respectively. Of the 1,010 fractions under consideration, 94.8% of DIRs were within TG-132 recommended tolerance. 30 radiomic features had a CCC > 0.90 and 21 had a mean |%∆|RF < 5%. Auto-propagation of prostate contours resulted in nearly 95% of DIRs within tolerance recommendations of TG-132, leading to the majority of features being regarded as acceptably robust. The use of auto contours for radiomic feature analysis is promising but must be done with caution.
本研究定量评估了一种商用形变图像配准(DIR)算法的准确性,该算法可自动生成前列腺轮廓,并进一步研究了放射组学特征对不同轮廓的稳健性。选择了 28 名在机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的协议下入组的前列腺癌患者。将计划 CT(pCT)变形配准到每日锥形束 CT(CBCT)以生成前列腺轮廓(自动轮廓)。前列腺轮廓也由医师手动绘制。在每日 CBCT 图像上使用 Dice 相似性系数(DSC)、平均差异到一致(MDA)、质心位置差异(ΔCM)和体积差异(ΔVol)对变形与手动绘制的前列腺轮廓进行定量评估。从每个轮廓中提取了 6 类的放射组学特征。计算自动和手动轮廓之间的放射组学特征衍生数据的 Lin 一致性相关系数(CCC)和平均绝对百分比差异(mean |%Δ|RF)。自动和手动前列腺轮廓之间的平均(±SD)DSC、MDA、ΔCM 和 ΔVol 分别为 0.90±0.04、1.81±0.47mm、2.17±1.26mm 和 5.1±4.1%。在所考虑的 1010 个分数中,94.8%的 DIR 在 TG-132 推荐的容差内。30 个放射组学特征的 CCC>0.90,21 个特征的平均|%∆|RF<5%。前列腺轮廓的自动传播导致近 95%的 DIR 在 TG-132 推荐的容差内,这使得大多数特征被认为是可接受的稳健。自动轮廓用于放射组学特征分析是有前途的,但必须谨慎使用。