• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亨利福特医院头痛残疾量表问卷波斯语版本的有效性和可靠性。

Validity and Reliability of Persian Version of Henry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory Questionnaire.

机构信息

Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

School of Public Health, Department of Statistic and Epidemiology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

Arch Iran Med. 2021 Oct 1;24(10):752-758. doi: 10.34172/aim.2021.111.

DOI:10.34172/aim.2021.111
PMID:34816697
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A limited number of headache disability indices exist that can evaluate and manage different disabilities related to headache among Iranian patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to translate and validate the Persian version of the Henry Ford headache disability inventory (HDI).

METHODS

The original questionnaire was translated and culturally adapted to the Persian setting. A total of 250 patients with chronic headache were enrolled in this study. The questionnaire's face validity, content validity, and convergent validity with Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) were evaluated and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted. Its internal consistency was also assessed and its short- and long-term test-retest reliability were examined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

The content validity indices were 0.85, 0.99, and 0.97 for simplicity, relevance, and clarity, respectively. The content validity ratio was calculated as one for all items. The findings of CFA confirmed that this index had a good fit. Cronbach's alpha was 0.91, 0.82, and 0.86 for the entire questionnaire as well as its functional and emotional subscales, respectively. The ICC was also calculated as 0.97 for the total inventory. The convergent validity showed significant negative correlations between HDI and short-form health survey items.

CONCLUSION

The validity and reliability of the Persian version of the HDI were confirmed. This questionnaire can explore the disabilities of Persian-speaking people with headache disorders.

摘要

背景

目前存在少量的头痛残疾指数,可以评估和管理伊朗患者与头痛相关的不同残疾。

目的

本研究旨在翻译和验证亨利福特头痛残疾量表(HDI)的波斯语版本。

方法

对原始问卷进行翻译和文化适应,以适应波斯语环境。共有 250 名慢性头痛患者纳入本研究。评估问卷的表面效度、内容效度和与简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)的收敛效度,并进行验证性因子分析(CFA)。还评估了其内部一致性,并通过组内相关系数(ICC)检查其短期和长期重测信度。

结果

简单性、相关性和清晰度的内容效度指数分别为 0.85、0.99 和 0.97。所有项目的内容效度比均计算为 1。CFA 的结果证实该指数具有良好的拟合度。整个问卷以及其功能和情感子量表的克朗巴赫系数分别为 0.91、0.82 和 0.86。总清单的 ICC 也计算为 0.97。收敛效度显示,HDI 与短式健康调查问卷项目之间存在显著负相关。

结论

波斯语版 HDI 的有效性和可靠性得到了证实。该问卷可用于评估讲波斯语的头痛障碍患者的残疾情况。

相似文献

1
Validity and Reliability of Persian Version of Henry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory Questionnaire.亨利福特医院头痛残疾量表问卷波斯语版本的有效性和可靠性。
Arch Iran Med. 2021 Oct 1;24(10):752-758. doi: 10.34172/aim.2021.111.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Henry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory (HDI/T) in patients with cervicogenic headache.亨利·福特医院头痛残疾量表土耳其语版(HDI/T)在颈源性头痛患者中的跨文化调适、信度及效度
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Feb;46(4):820-827. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2178679. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
3
Persian version of the brief Older People's Quality of Life questionnaire (OPQOL-brief): the evaluation of the psychometric properties.简要老年人生活质量问卷(OPQOL-brief)的波斯语版本:心理测量特性评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 7;18(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01586-8.
4
Adaptation, reliability and validity testing of a Persian version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index in Iranian patients with rheumatoid arthritis.伊朗类风湿关节炎患者中波斯语版健康评估问卷残疾指数的适应性、信度和效度测试
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017 Jan;21(1):133-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
5
Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire for Iranian People With Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain.伊朗非特异性慢性颈痛人群应对策略问卷波斯文版的验证性因子分析、信度和效度。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Jan;44(1):72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
6
Brazilian Portuguese version of the Headache Disability Inventory: Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability.《头痛残疾量表》的巴西葡萄牙语版本:跨文化调适、效度和信度。
Cephalalgia. 2021 Feb;41(2):156-165. doi: 10.1177/0333102420949860. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
7
Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Persian version of Shoulder Activity Scale in a group of patients with shoulder disorders.波斯语版肩部活动量表在一组肩部疾病患者中的信度、效度及反应度
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(19):1777-82. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.981303. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
8
Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the PRAFAB questionnaire in Iranian women with urinary incontinence.尿失禁伊朗女性中 PRAFAB 问卷波斯语版本的有效性和可靠性。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Aug;34(8):1815-1821. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05470-z. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
9
The validity and reliability properties of a Persian version of the evidence-based practice profile (EBP) questionnaire among Iranian students of health-related fields.一个基于证据的实践概况(EBP)问卷的波斯语版本在伊朗健康相关领域学生中的有效性和可靠性特性。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):1143. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06139-x.
10
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the pain anxiety symptom scale (PASS-20) in chronic non-specific neck pain patients.疼痛焦虑症状量表(PASS-20)波斯版本在慢性非特异性颈痛患者中的心理测量学特性。
Scand J Pain. 2022 Feb 17;22(3):552-560. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0146. Print 2022 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation and exercise therapy for the treatment of cervicogenic headaches: A randomized pilot trial.经颅直流电刺激联合运动疗法治疗颈源性头痛的安全性和可行性:一项随机对照试验。
Headache. 2025 May;65(5):845-862. doi: 10.1111/head.14887. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
2
The safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with conservative treatment for patients with cervicogenic headaches: A double-blinded randomized control study protocol.经颅直流电刺激联合保守治疗对颈源性头痛患者的安全性和可行性:一项双盲随机对照研究方案
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Sep 19;42:101370. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101370. eCollection 2024 Dec.