Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, School of Dentistry, Post-Graduate Program in Pediatric Dentistry, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2021 Nov 19;35:e114. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0114. eCollection 2021.
Dentifrices containing different active agents may be helpful to allow rehardening and to increase the resistance of the eroded surface to further acids or mechanical impacts. This study aimed to compare the effects of conventional (sodium fluoride [NaF]) and stannous fluoride (SnF2)-containing dentifrices on reducing erosive tooth wear (ETW). The PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, LILACS, BBO, EMBASE, TRIP electronic databases, and grey literature were searched until January 2021 to retrieve relevant in vitro and in situ studies related to research question. There were no restrictions on publication year or language. Two authors independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. ETW data were pooled to calculate and compare both dentifrices (overall analysis) and in vitro and in situ studies separately (subgroup analysis). Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan5.3 with a random effects model. Of 820 potentially eligible studies, 101 were selected for full-text analysis, and 8 were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. There was a significant difference between SnF2-containing dentifrices and NaF dentifrices only for in vitro studies (p=0.04), showing a higher effect of the SnF2-containing dentifrices against the erosion/abrasion (effect size: -6.80 95%CI: -13.42; -0.19). Most in vitro and in situ studies had high and low risk of bias, respectively. In vitro literature suggests that the ETW reduction is greater when using SnF2-containing dentifrices instead NaF-containing dentifrices. However, the evidence level is insufficient for definitive conclusions. Clinical trials are necessary for a better understanding of the effect of these compounds on ETW.
含不同活性剂的牙膏有助于再矿化,并提高被侵蚀表面对进一步酸蚀或机械性磨损的抵抗力。本研究旨在比较含常规(氟化钠[NaF])和氟化亚锡(SnF2)的牙膏对减少酸蚀性牙齿磨损(ETW)的效果。使用 PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus、LILACS、BBO、EMBASE、TRIP 电子数据库和灰色文献检索了截至 2021 年 1 月的相关体外和体内研究,以检索与研究问题相关的研究。未对出版年份或语言进行限制。两名作者独立选择研究、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。汇总 ETW 数据以计算和比较两种牙膏(总体分析)以及体外和体内研究(亚组分析)。使用 RevMan5.3 软件进行统计分析,采用随机效应模型。在 820 项可能符合条件的研究中,有 101 项被选入全文分析,8 项被纳入系统评价和荟萃分析。仅在体外研究中,含 SnF2 的牙膏与含 NaF 的牙膏之间存在显著差异(p=0.04),表明含 SnF2 的牙膏对侵蚀/磨损的效果更高(效应量:-6.80 95%CI:-13.42;-0.19)。大多数体外和体内研究的偏倚风险分别较高和较低。体外文献表明,使用含 SnF2 的牙膏代替含 NaF 的牙膏,可更有效地减少 ETW。然而,目前还没有足够的证据得出明确的结论。需要进行临床试验,以更好地了解这些化合物对 ETW 的影响。