• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生对可开方的移动医疗应用程序的态度及其在德国采用的影响:混合方法研究。

Physicians' Attitudes Toward Prescribable mHealth Apps and Implications for Adoption in Germany: Mixed Methods Study.

机构信息

Didactics and Educational Research in Health Care, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.

Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 23;9(11):e33012. doi: 10.2196/33012.

DOI:10.2196/33012
PMID:34817385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8663495/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In October 2020, Germany became the first country, worldwide, to approve certain mobile health (mHealth) apps, referred to as DiGA (Digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen, in German, meaning digital health applications), for prescription with costs covered by standard statutory health insurance. Yet, this option has only been used to a limited extent so far.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate physicians' and psychotherapists' current attitudes toward mHealth apps, barriers to adoption, and potential remedies.

METHODS

We conducted a two-stage sequential mixed methods study. In phase one, semistructured interviews were conducted with physicians and psychotherapists for questionnaire design. In phase two, an online survey was conducted among general practitioners, physicians, and psychotherapists.

RESULTS

A total of 1308 survey responses by mostly outpatient-care general practitioners, physicians, and psychotherapists from across Germany who could prescribe DiGA were recorded, making this the largest study on mHealth prescriptions to date. A total of 62.1% (807/1299) of respondents supported the opportunity to prescribe DiGA. Improved adherence (997/1294, 77.0%), health literacy (842/1294, 65.1%), and disease management (783/1294, 60.5%) were most frequently seen as benefits of DiGA. However, only 30.3% (393/1299) of respondents planned to prescribe DiGA, varying greatly by medical specialty. Professionals are still facing substantial barriers, such as insufficient information (1135/1295, 87.6%), reimbursement for DiGA-related medical services (716/1299, 55.1%), medical evidence (712/1298, 54.9%), legal uncertainties (680/1299, 52.3%), and technological uncertainties (658/1299, 50.7%). To support professionals who are unsure of prescribing DiGA, extended information campaigns (1104/1297, 85.1%) as well as recommendations from medical associations (1041/1297, 80.3%) and medical colleagues (1024/1297, 79.0%) were seen as the most impactful remedies.

CONCLUSIONS

To realize the benefits from DiGA through increased adoption, additional information sharing about DiGA from trusted bodies, reimbursement for DiGA-related medical services, and further medical evidence are recommended.

摘要

背景

2020 年 10 月,德国成为全球首个批准某些移动医疗(mHealth)应用程序(称为 DiGA,德语为数字化健康应用程序)处方的国家,这些应用程序的费用由法定健康保险承担。然而,到目前为止,这种选择的使用范围还很有限。

目的

本研究旨在调查医生和心理治疗师对 mHealth 应用程序的当前态度、采用障碍以及潜在的补救措施。

方法

我们进行了一项两阶段顺序混合方法研究。在第一阶段,对医生和心理治疗师进行了半结构化访谈,以设计问卷。在第二阶段,对德国各地的全科医生、医生和心理治疗师进行了在线调查。

结果

记录了来自德国各地的可开具 DiGA 的门诊医生、医生和心理治疗师的 1308 份调查回复,这是迄今为止关于 mHealth 处方的最大研究。共有 62.1%(807/1299)的受访者支持开具 DiGA 的机会。改善依从性(997/1294,77.0%)、健康素养(842/1294,65.1%)和疾病管理(783/1294,60.5%)是最常被视为 DiGA 益处的因素。然而,只有 30.3%(393/1299)的受访者计划开具 DiGA,这在不同医疗专业之间差异很大。专业人员仍然面临着许多障碍,例如信息不足(1135/1295,87.6%)、DiGA 相关医疗服务的报销(716/1299,55.1%)、医学证据(712/1298,54.9%)、法律不确定性(680/1299,52.3%)和技术不确定性(658/1299,50.7%)。为了支持对开具 DiGA 不确定的专业人员,建议开展扩展信息宣传活动(1104/1297,85.1%),以及来自医学协会(1041/1297,80.3%)和医学同事(1024/1297,79.0%)的推荐。

结论

为了通过增加采用来实现 DiGA 的益处,建议从可信赖的机构进一步分享关于 DiGA 的信息、DiGA 相关医疗服务的报销以及更多的医学证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/510d/8663495/425ac133378e/mhealth_v9i11e33012_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/510d/8663495/cc670c29a302/mhealth_v9i11e33012_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/510d/8663495/8bec5624125b/mhealth_v9i11e33012_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/510d/8663495/b540aac47df9/mhealth_v9i11e33012_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/510d/8663495/425ac133378e/mhealth_v9i11e33012_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/510d/8663495/cc670c29a302/mhealth_v9i11e33012_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/510d/8663495/8bec5624125b/mhealth_v9i11e33012_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/510d/8663495/b540aac47df9/mhealth_v9i11e33012_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/510d/8663495/425ac133378e/mhealth_v9i11e33012_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Physicians' Attitudes Toward Prescribable mHealth Apps and Implications for Adoption in Germany: Mixed Methods Study.医生对可开方的移动医疗应用程序的态度及其在德国采用的影响:混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 23;9(11):e33012. doi: 10.2196/33012.
2
Evidence of How Physicians and Their Patients Adopt mHealth Apps in Germany: Exploratory Qualitative Study.德国医生及其患者采用移动医疗应用程序的证据:探索性定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 17;12:e48345. doi: 10.2196/48345.
3
DiGA in Primary Care and the Influence of Patient-Related Factors - Results of a Survey of Family Doctors.初级保健中的 DiGA 及相关患者因素的影响 - 家庭医生调查结果。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Apr 26;313:55-61. doi: 10.3233/SHTI240012.
4
Problems and Barriers Related to the Use of Digital Health Applications: Scoping Review.数字健康应用使用相关问题及障碍:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 12;25:e43808. doi: 10.2196/43808.
5
Mental Health Professionals' Attitudes Toward Digital Mental Health Apps and Implications for Adoption in Portugal: Mixed Methods Study.心理健康专业人员对数字心理健康应用程序的态度及其在葡萄牙采用的影响:混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Jun 2;10:e45949. doi: 10.2196/45949.
6
Digital Health Applications (DiGAs) on a Fast Track: Insights From a Data-Driven Analysis of Prescribable Digital Therapeutics in Germany From 2020 to Mid-2024.数字健康应用(DiGAs)快速发展:2020 年至 2024 年年中德国可处方数字治疗药物的数据分析洞察。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 29;26:e59013. doi: 10.2196/59013.
7
Patient Acceptance of Prescribed and Fully Reimbursed mHealth Apps in Germany: An UTAUT2-based Online Survey Study.德国患者对处方和全额报销的移动健康应用程序的接受度:基于 UTAUT2 的在线调查研究。
J Med Syst. 2023 Jan 27;47(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01910-x.
8
Enablers and inhibitors to the adoption of mHealth apps by patients - A qualitative analysis of German doctors' perspectives.促进和阻碍患者采用移动医疗应用程序的因素——德国医生观点的定性分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Sep;114:107865. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107865. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
9
Attitudes of General Practitioners Toward Prescription of Mobile Health Apps: Qualitative Study.全科医生对开具移动健康应用程序处方的态度:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Mar 4;9(3):e21795. doi: 10.2196/21795.
10
Problems and Barriers Related to the Use of Digital Health Applications: Protocol for a Scoping Review.与数字健康应用使用相关的问题和障碍:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Apr 21;11(4):e32702. doi: 10.2196/32702.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging the knowledge gap: a mixed-methods study on general practitioners' information needs for mHealth apps in hypertension treatment in Germany.弥合知识差距:一项关于德国全科医生在高血压治疗中对移动健康应用程序信息需求的混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 10;25(1):1195. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13192-9.
2
Exploring primary care doctors' perceptions and experiences in adopting mHealth with patients: A qualitative study.探索基层医疗医生在与患者采用移动健康技术方面的认知与经验:一项定性研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 2;11:20552076251347850. doi: 10.1177/20552076251347850. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Health App Assessments Among Health Care Stakeholders: Discrete Choice Experiment.

本文引用的文献

1
Germany's digital health reforms in the COVID-19 era: lessons and opportunities for other countries.德国在新冠疫情时代的数字健康改革:其他国家可借鉴的经验与机遇
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Jul 10;3:94. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0306-7. eCollection 2020.
2
Understanding Clinicians' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: A Qualitative Review of the Most Used Frameworks.理解临床医生对移动医疗工具的采用:最常用框架的定性综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 6;8(7):e18072. doi: 10.2196/18072.
3
Social, Organizational, and Technological Factors Impacting Clinicians' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review.
医疗保健利益相关者对健康应用程序评估的偏好和支付意愿:离散选择实验
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 May 26;13:e57474. doi: 10.2196/57474.
4
Compatibility of the CEN-ISO/TS 82304-2 Health App Assessment Framework With Catalan and Italian Health Authorities' Needs: Qualitative Interview Study.CEN-ISO/TS 82304-2健康应用程序评估框架与加泰罗尼亚和意大利卫生当局需求的兼容性:定性访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 21;9:e67855. doi: 10.2196/67855.
5
From awareness to integration: a qualitative interview study on the impact of digital therapeutics on physicians' practices in Germany.从认知到整合:关于数字疗法对德国医生医疗实践影响的定性访谈研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12656-2.
6
The Role of the Installed Base in Information Exchange Among General Practitioners in Germany: Mixed Methods Study.德国全科医生中既有设备基础在信息交流中的作用:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 24;27:e65241. doi: 10.2196/65241.
7
Nurses' perspectives on using mobile health applications in southeastern Iran: Awareness, attitude, and obstacles.伊朗东南部护士对使用移动健康应用程序的看法:认知、态度和障碍。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 10;20(3):e0316631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316631. eCollection 2025.
8
Diagnosis Documentation Done Right: Cross-Specialty Standard for the Diagnosis Section in German Discharge Summaries - A Mixed-Methods Study.正确完成诊断记录:德国出院小结中诊断部分的跨专业标准——一项混合方法研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May;40(6):1387-1402. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09395-9. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
9
Acceptance of online therapy for children and adolescents with digital media use disorders: perspectives from child and adolescent psychiatrists and psychotherapists in Germany.德国儿童和青少年精神科医生及心理治疗师对患有数字媒体使用障碍的儿童和青少年接受在线治疗的看法。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 13. doi: 10.1007/s00787-025-02640-w.
10
The overlooked burden of persistent physical symptoms: a call for action in European healthcare.持续性身体症状被忽视的负担:呼吁欧洲医疗保健采取行动
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Nov 26;48:101140. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101140. eCollection 2025 Jan.
社会、组织和技术因素对临床医生采用移动医疗工具的影响:系统文献回顾。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Feb 20;8(2):e15935. doi: 10.2196/15935.
4
Effectiveness of a tailored, integrative Internet intervention (deprexis) for depression: Updated meta-analysis.针对抑郁症的定制化、整合型互联网干预(deprexis)的有效性:更新的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):e0228100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228100. eCollection 2020.
5
Smartphone use in ophthalmology: What is their place in clinical practice?智能手机在眼科学中的应用:它们在临床实践中的地位如何?
Surv Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar-Apr;65(2):250-262. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.09.001. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
6
Current Knowledge and Adoption of Mobile Health Apps Among Australian General Practitioners: Survey Study.澳大利亚全科医生对移动医疗应用的认知和采用情况:调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jun 3;7(6):e13199. doi: 10.2196/13199.
7
Theoretical Advancements in mHealth: A Systematic Review of Mobile Apps.移动医疗的理论进展:移动应用程序的系统评价
J Health Commun. 2018;23(10-11):909-955. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1544676. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
8
Randomized Controlled Trial to Test the Efficacy of an Unguided Online Intervention with Automated Feedback for the Treatment of Insomnia.一项检验无指导在线干预及自动反馈治疗失眠疗效的随机对照试验。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 May;47(3):287-302. doi: 10.1017/S1352465818000486. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
9
What Predicts Patients' Adoption Intention Toward mHealth Services in China: Empirical Study.在中国,哪些因素能预测患者对移动医疗服务的采用意愿:实证研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Aug 29;6(8):e172. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9316.
10
mHealth Approaches in Managing Skin Cancer: Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Research Using Integrative Mapping.移动健康在皮肤癌管理中的应用:基于整合映射的循证研究系统评价
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Aug 2;6(8):e164. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8554.