• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌患者采取健康行为时的信息提供、决策自我效能感与决策冲突:一项横断面研究

Information Provision, Decision Self-efficacy, and Decisional Conflict in Adopting Health Behaviors Among Patients Treated for Colorectal Cancer: A Cross-sectional Study.

作者信息

Lee Myung Kyung, Bryant-Lukosius Denise

机构信息

Author Affiliations: College of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea (Dr Lee); and School of Nursing and Department of Oncology, Canadian Centre for Advanced Practice Nursing Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Dr Bryant-Lukosius).

出版信息

Cancer Nurs. 2023;46(1):45-56. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001040. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1097/NCC.0000000000001040
PMID:34817417
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health promotion is necessary to mitigate the negative consequences of colorectal cancer and its treatment. Rates of behavior modification are low in populations of cancer patients. Studies are needed to determine the factors, such as decisional conflict, which influence adoption of healthy behaviors following a cancer diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of information provision, decision self-efficacy, and decisional conflict on the adoption of healthy behaviors among patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study focused on 251 patients with colorectal cancer in South Korea. Information provision, decision self-efficacy, and decisional conflict were measured using validated instruments. Patients rated their decisional conflict related to the adoption of behaviors that include regular exercise and a balanced diet.

RESULTS

Most participants (73%) reported low satisfaction with the amount of information received. Of the participants, 64% had low decision self-efficacy, and 80% experienced decisional conflict. The perception of a higher level of information provision was associated with greater decision self-efficacy (odds ratio, 4.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.61-13.35). Higher decision self-efficacy was associated with lower decisional conflict (odds ratio, 5.19; 95% confidence interval, 2.33-11.59).

CONCLUSION

Receiving adequate information is important for promoting patients' confidence in making decisions about their health and reducing decisional conflict in the adoption of healthy lifestyle changes following a cancer diagnosis.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

Oncology nurses should assess patient information needs and promote decision self-efficacy, thus empowering patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer to make lifestyle decisions that improve their health and quality of life.

摘要

背景

促进健康对于减轻结直肠癌及其治疗的负面影响是必要的。癌症患者群体中行为改变的发生率较低。需要开展研究以确定影响癌症诊断后健康行为采纳的因素,如决策冲突。

目的

探讨信息提供、决策自我效能感和决策冲突对结直肠癌患者健康行为采纳的影响。

方法

这项横断面研究聚焦于韩国的251名结直肠癌患者。使用经过验证的工具测量信息提供、决策自我效能感和决策冲突。患者对与采取包括规律运动和均衡饮食在内的行为相关的决策冲突进行评分。

结果

大多数参与者(73%)报告对所获信息量满意度低。在参与者中,64%的人决策自我效能感低,80%的人经历决策冲突。较高水平的信息提供感知与更高的决策自我效能感相关(优势比,4.63;95%置信区间,1.61 - 13.35)。较高的决策自我效能感与较低的决策冲突相关(优势比,5.19;95%置信区间,2.33 - 11.59)。

结论

获得足够的信息对于增强患者对自身健康决策的信心以及减少癌症诊断后采纳健康生活方式改变时的决策冲突很重要。

对实践的启示

肿瘤护理人员应评估患者的信息需求并提高决策自我效能感,从而使被诊断为结直肠癌的患者有能力做出改善其健康和生活质量的生活方式决策。

相似文献

1
Information Provision, Decision Self-efficacy, and Decisional Conflict in Adopting Health Behaviors Among Patients Treated for Colorectal Cancer: A Cross-sectional Study.结直肠癌患者采取健康行为时的信息提供、决策自我效能感与决策冲突:一项横断面研究
Cancer Nurs. 2023;46(1):45-56. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001040. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
2
Randomised controlled trial of a repeated consultation support intervention for patients with colorectal cancer.随机对照试验对结直肠癌患者重复咨询支持干预的研究。
Psychooncology. 2019 Apr;28(4):702-709. doi: 10.1002/pon.4965. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
3
Conflict when making decisions about dialysis modality.在决定透析方式时出现冲突。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jan;27(1-2):e138-e146. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13890. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
4
Decision Self-Efficacy and Decisional Conflict on Reintubation among Surrogates of Ventilated Patients Undergoing Planned Extubation.计划撤机的通气患者代理人对再插管的决策自我效能和决策冲突。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2023 Dec;17(5):235-244. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2023.10.001. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
5
The relationships among knowledge, self-efficacy, preparedness, decisional conflict, and decisions to participate in a cancer clinical trial.知识、自我效能、准备度、决策冲突与参与癌症临床试验决策之间的关系。
Psychooncology. 2013 Mar;22(3):481-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.3043. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
6
Factors influencing patients' decision-making about preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders.影响患者对单基因疾病植入前遗传学检测决策的因素。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Oct 31;37(11):2599-2610. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac185.
7
Association between information provision and decisional conflict in cancer patients.信息提供与癌症患者决策冲突的关系。
Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1974-1980. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv275. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
8
Perception of cancer and inconsistency in medical information are associated with decisional conflict: a pilot study of men with prostate cancer who undergo active surveillance.癌症认知和医疗信息不一致与决策冲突相关:一项对接受主动监测的前列腺癌男性的初步研究。
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(2 Pt 2):E50-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10791.x. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
9
Patient preference for involvement, experienced involvement, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with physician: a structural equation model test.患者对参与、体验参与、决策冲突以及对医生的满意度的偏好:结构方程模型检验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun 25;13:231. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-231.
10
Effects of decisional conflict, decision regret and self-stigma on quality of life for breast cancer survivors: A cross-sectional, multisite study in China.决策冲突、决策后悔和自我污名对乳腺癌幸存者生活质量的影响:中国的一项横断面、多中心研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Oct;78(10):3261-3272. doi: 10.1111/jan.15250. Epub 2022 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of patient-centered communication on psychological distress: the chain mediating role of health-related self-efficacy and healthy lifestyle behaviors and the moderating role of social media use.以患者为中心的沟通对心理困扰的影响:健康相关自我效能感和健康生活方式行为的链式中介作用以及社交媒体使用的调节作用。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 14;16:1562414. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1562414. eCollection 2025.
2
Navigating decisional conflict: laser peripheral iridotomy for primary angle-closure glaucoma prevention.应对决策冲突:激光周边虹膜切开术预防原发性闭角型青光眼
Int J Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 18;18(4):627-636. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2025.04.08. eCollection 2025.
3
Self-Advocacy Among Women With Uterine Malignancies.
子宫恶性肿瘤女性的自我维权
Nurs Res. 2025;74(3):186-192. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000813. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
4
Decision experiences in joint replacement surgery for patients with haemophilic arthritis: A qualitative study.血友病性关节炎患者关节置换手术中的决策体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 4;25(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02901-3.
5
The influence of decisional conflict on treatment decision in pelvic organ prolapse-data from the SHADE-POP trial.决策冲突对盆腔器官脱垂治疗决策的影响——SHADE-POP 试验数据。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Nov;310(5):2737-2744. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07723-8. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
6
The relationship between physical activity, self-efficacy and quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors: a multicenter cross-sectional study.结直肠癌幸存者的体力活动、自我效能感与生活质量之间的关系:一项多中心横断面研究。
Discov Oncol. 2024 Jan 5;15(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s12672-023-00854-5.
7
Patient Experiences and Perspectives of Their Decision-Making to Accept Lung Transplantation Referral: A Qualitative Study.患者对接受肺移植推荐的决策过程的体验和看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 5;20(5):4599. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054599.