Department of Radiology Technology, Taibah University, Medina, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
MAGMA. 2022 Feb;35(1):113-125. doi: 10.1007/s10334-021-00975-4. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
To investigate the repeatability of perfusion measures in gliomas using pulsed- and pseudo-continuous-arterial spin labelling (PASL, PCASL) techniques, and evaluate different regions-of-interest (ROIs) for relative tumour blood flow (rTBF) normalisation.
Repeatability of cerebral blood flow (CBF) was measured in the Contralateral Normal Appearing Hemisphere (CNAH) and in brain tumours (aTBF). rTBF was normalised using both large/small ROIs from the CNAH. Repeatability was evaluated with intra-class-correlation-coefficient (ICC), Within-Coefficient-of-Variation (WCoV) and Coefficient-of-Repeatability (CR).
PASL and PCASL demonstrated high reliability (ICC > 0.9) for CNAH-CBF, aTBF and rTBF. PCASL demonstrated a more stable signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) with a lower WCoV of the SNR than that of PASL (10.9-42.5% vs. 12.3-29.2%). PASL and PCASL showed higher WCoV in aTBF and rTBF than in CNAH CBF in WM and GM but not in the caudate, and higher WCoV for rTBF than for aTBF when normalised using a small ROI (PASL 8.1% vs. 4.7%, PCASL 10.9% vs. 7.9%, respectively). The lowest CR was observed for rTBF normalised with a large ROI.
PASL and PCASL showed similar repeatability for the assessment of perfusion parameters in patients with primary brain tumours as previous studies based on volunteers. Both methods displayed reasonable WCoV in the tumour area and CNAH. PCASL's more stable SNR in small areas (caudate) is likely to be due to the longer post-labelling delays.
利用脉冲动脉自旋标记(PASL)和假性连续动脉自旋标记(PCASL)技术研究脑肿瘤灌注参数的可重复性,并评估不同感兴趣区(ROI)用于相对肿瘤血流(rTBF)归一化的效果。
在对侧正常表现半球(CNAH)和脑肿瘤(aTBF)中测量脑血流(CBF)的重复性。使用 CNAH 的大/小 ROI 对 rTBF 进行归一化。采用组内相关系数(ICC)、变异系数内(WCoV)和可重复性系数(CR)评估重复性。
PASL 和 PCASL 均显示 CNAH-CBF、aTBF 和 rTBF 的可靠性高(ICC>0.9)。PCASL 比 PASL 具有更稳定的信噪比(SNR),其 SNR 的 WCoV 更低(10.9-42.5% 比 12.3-29.2%)。与 CNAH-CBF 相比,PASL 和 PCASL 在 WM 和 GM 中的 aTBF 和 rTBF 中表现出更高的 WCoV,但在尾状核中没有,并且使用小 ROI 归一化时 rTBF 的 WCoV 更高(PASL 8.1%比 4.7%,PCASL 10.9%比 7.9%)。使用大 ROI 归一化时,rTBF 的 CR 最低。
PASL 和 PCASL 与之前基于志愿者的研究相比,在评估原发性脑肿瘤患者的灌注参数方面表现出相似的可重复性。两种方法在肿瘤区域和 CNAH 中均显示出合理的 WCoV。PCASL 在小区域(尾状核)中更稳定的 SNR 可能是由于较长的标记后延迟。