Laboratory of Biomechanics and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Saint-Joseph, Beirut, Lebanon.
Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Paris, France.
Spine Deform. 2022 May;10(3):509-514. doi: 10.1007/s43390-021-00443-y. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
Investigate the axial plane deformity in the scoliotic segment and its relationship to the deformity in the frontal and sagittal planes.
Two hundred subjects with AIS (Cobb ≥ 20°) underwent low dose biplanar X-rays with 3D reconstruction of the spine and pelvis. All structural curves were considered and were distributed as follows: 142 thoracic (T), 70 thoracolumbar (TL), and 47 lumbar curves (L). Common 3D spino-pelvic and scoliosis parameters were collected such as: frontal Cobb; torsion index (TI); hypokyphosis/lordosis index (HI). Parameters were compared between each type of curvature and correlations were investigated between the 3 planes.
Frontal Cobb was higher in all T (45 ± 19°) and TL (41 ± 15°) curves compared to L curves (35 ± 14°, p = 0.004). TI was higher in T curves when compared to TL and L curves (TI: 15 ± 8°, 9 ± 6°, 7 ± 5°, p < 0.001). HI was similar between curve types. T curves showed significant correlations between the 3 planes: Cobb vs. TI (r = 0.76), Cobb vs. HI (r = - 0.54) and HI vs. TI (r = - 0.42). The axial plane deformity was related to the frontal deformity and the type of curvature (adjusted-R = 0.6).
Beside showing the most severe deformity frontally and axially compared to TL and L curves, the T curves showed strong correlations between the 3 planes of the deformity. Moreover, this study showed that the axial plane deformity cannot be fully determined by the frontal and sagittal deformities, which highlights the importance of 3D assessment in the setting of AIS.
研究脊柱侧弯节段的轴向平面畸形及其与额状面和矢状面畸形的关系。
200 例 AIS(Cobb 角≥20°)患者行低剂量双平面 X 线检查,并对脊柱骨盆进行 3D 重建。所有结构性曲线均被考虑,并分布如下:142 个胸椎(T)、70 个胸腰椎(TL)和 47 个腰椎(L)曲线。收集了常见的三维脊柱骨盆和脊柱侧弯参数,如:额状面 Cobb 角;扭转指数(TI);后凸/前凸指数(HI)。比较了每种类型曲线之间的参数,并研究了 3 个平面之间的相关性。
所有 T(45±19°)和 TL(41±15°)曲线的额状面 Cobb 角均高于 L 曲线(35±14°,p=0.004)。与 TL 和 L 曲线相比,T 曲线的 TI 更高(TI:15±8°、9±6°、7±5°,p<0.001)。各曲线类型之间的 HI 相似。T 曲线在 3 个平面之间存在显著相关性:Cobb 角与 TI(r=0.76)、Cobb 角与 HI(r=-0.54)和 HI 与 TI(r=-0.42)。轴向平面畸形与额状面畸形和曲线类型有关(调整后的 R²=0.6)。
与 TL 和 L 曲线相比,T 曲线在额状面和轴向平面显示出最严重的畸形,并且在 3 个平面之间存在较强的相关性。此外,本研究表明,轴向平面畸形不能完全由额状面和矢状面畸形决定,这凸显了在 AIS 中进行 3D 评估的重要性。